The survival effect of neoadjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant plus adjuvant therapy on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with different TNM stages: a propensity score matching analysis based on the SEER database.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2024.2347513
Hao Hu, Yang Xu, Qiang Zhang, Yuan Gao, Zhenyu Wu
{"title":"The survival effect of neoadjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant plus adjuvant therapy on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with different TNM stages: a propensity score matching analysis based on the SEER database.","authors":"Hao Hu, Yang Xu, Qiang Zhang, Yuan Gao, Zhenyu Wu","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2347513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nAdjuvant therapy (AT) and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are standard treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) depending on the status of the disease. However, whether AT improves survival after NAT and radical resection in all TNM stages remains unclear.\n\n\nRESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS\nWe utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2019) for PDAC patients who underwent radical surgery and applied Pearson's chi-square test, multivariate and univariate Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier plot, Log-rank tests, and propensity score matching (PSM) for analysis.\n\n\nRESULTS\nGiven PSM after enrolling 13,868 PDAC patients, significant differences in survival were identified between AT and neoadjuvant therapy plus adjuvant therapy (NATAT) (p = 0.023) as well as between NAT and NATAT (p < 0.001). According to the AJCC 8th TNM stage, a survival advantage associated with NATAT was exclusively observed in stage III and IV disease, except for T4N0M0. Some stage IV patients receiving NATAT exhibited comparable survival to their counterparts without metastasis.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIn this retrospective cohort study, we demonstrated that patients harboring tumors in late TNM stages, including N2 resectable PDAC, might have better survival from NATAT, and that certain patients with M1 disease might still benefit from comprehensive systemic therapy and radical resection.","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2347513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Adjuvant therapy (AT) and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are standard treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) depending on the status of the disease. However, whether AT improves survival after NAT and radical resection in all TNM stages remains unclear. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2019) for PDAC patients who underwent radical surgery and applied Pearson's chi-square test, multivariate and univariate Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier plot, Log-rank tests, and propensity score matching (PSM) for analysis. RESULTS Given PSM after enrolling 13,868 PDAC patients, significant differences in survival were identified between AT and neoadjuvant therapy plus adjuvant therapy (NATAT) (p = 0.023) as well as between NAT and NATAT (p < 0.001). According to the AJCC 8th TNM stage, a survival advantage associated with NATAT was exclusively observed in stage III and IV disease, except for T4N0M0. Some stage IV patients receiving NATAT exhibited comparable survival to their counterparts without metastasis. CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective cohort study, we demonstrated that patients harboring tumors in late TNM stages, including N2 resectable PDAC, might have better survival from NATAT, and that certain patients with M1 disease might still benefit from comprehensive systemic therapy and radical resection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新辅助治疗和新辅助加辅助治疗对不同TNM分期胰腺导管腺癌患者的生存效果:基于SEER数据库的倾向得分匹配分析。
背景辅助治疗(AT)和新辅助治疗(NAT)是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的标准治疗方法,具体取决于疾病的状态。研究设计和方法我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2010-2019 年)对接受根治术的 PDAC 患者进行了研究,并应用皮尔逊卡方检验、多变量和单变量 Cox 回归、卡普兰-梅耶尔图、对数秩检验和倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行了分析。结果在纳入 13,868 例 PDAC 患者后,根据 PSM,发现 AT 与新辅助治疗加辅助治疗(NATAT)之间(P = 0.023)以及 NAT 与 NATAT 之间(P < 0.001)的生存率存在显著差异。根据 AJCC 第 8 次 TNM 分期,除 T4N0M0 外,NATAT 的生存优势仅在 III 期和 IV 期疾病中观察到。结论 在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们证实了TNM分期较晚的肿瘤患者(包括N2可切除的PDAC)可能会从NATAT中获得更好的生存,而某些M1患者仍可能从全面系统治疗和根治性切除中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
JARID2 activation by NFYA promotes stemness of triple-negative breast cancer cells through the PI3K/AKT pathway. Implementing Machine Learning to Predict Survival Outcomes in Patients with Resected Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma. Current immunotherapy techniques in meningioma. PARP inhibitor resistance mechanisms and PARP inhibitor derived imaging probes. Utilizing risk factors to guide treatment decisions in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1