Suture-Needle Management Device and Novel Port Configuration for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.

Deepanjana Das, Natalie Squires, Margaret G. Mueller, Sarah Collins, C. Lewicky-Gaupp, C. Bretschneider, J. Geynisman-Tan, Kimberly S Kenton
{"title":"Suture-Needle Management Device and Novel Port Configuration for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.","authors":"Deepanjana Das, Natalie Squires, Margaret G. Mueller, Sarah Collins, C. Lewicky-Gaupp, C. Bretschneider, J. Geynisman-Tan, Kimberly S Kenton","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\nRobot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is a commonly performed procedure for the repair of apical pelvic organ prolapse; therefore, novel devices and techniques to improve safety and efficacy of this procedure should be explored.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe objective of this study was to assess safety and efficacy of 8-mm trocar site for use of a disposable suture/needle management device (StitchKit; Origami Surgical, Madison, NJ) for robot-assisted SCP with a 4-arm configuration and no assistant port.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nThis is a retrospective case series of patients undergoing robot-assisted SCP at a tertiary center from 2018 to 2021. All surgical procedures were performed using four 8-mm robotic trocars and StitchKit device. Our objective was to review all cases in which this technique was used to determine whether the approach resulted in a safely completed procedure and any complications or adverse events. Secondary objectives were to describe patient and operative characteristics.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn total, 422 patients underwent robot-assisted SCP for pelvic organ prolapse. The mean age was 60 ± 10 years, and mean body mass index was 27 ± 6 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Most patients had stage 3 prolapse (73%) and underwent concomitant hysterectomy (70%). Ninety-nine percent (n = 416) of cases were completed robotically. StitchKit was successfully inserted and removed in all robotic cases with correct needle counts. All patients had postoperative visits, and 80% followed up at 3 months. No umbilical/port site hernias, operative site infections, or adverse events were reported.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nRobot-assisted SCP can be performed safely using a 4-arm robotic configuration and suture kit device. This setup eliminates incisions greater than 8 mm and an assistant port, allowing for surgical efficiency without compromising patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"33 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is a commonly performed procedure for the repair of apical pelvic organ prolapse; therefore, novel devices and techniques to improve safety and efficacy of this procedure should be explored. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess safety and efficacy of 8-mm trocar site for use of a disposable suture/needle management device (StitchKit; Origami Surgical, Madison, NJ) for robot-assisted SCP with a 4-arm configuration and no assistant port. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective case series of patients undergoing robot-assisted SCP at a tertiary center from 2018 to 2021. All surgical procedures were performed using four 8-mm robotic trocars and StitchKit device. Our objective was to review all cases in which this technique was used to determine whether the approach resulted in a safely completed procedure and any complications or adverse events. Secondary objectives were to describe patient and operative characteristics. RESULTS In total, 422 patients underwent robot-assisted SCP for pelvic organ prolapse. The mean age was 60 ± 10 years, and mean body mass index was 27 ± 6 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Most patients had stage 3 prolapse (73%) and underwent concomitant hysterectomy (70%). Ninety-nine percent (n = 416) of cases were completed robotically. StitchKit was successfully inserted and removed in all robotic cases with correct needle counts. All patients had postoperative visits, and 80% followed up at 3 months. No umbilical/port site hernias, operative site infections, or adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted SCP can be performed safely using a 4-arm robotic configuration and suture kit device. This setup eliminates incisions greater than 8 mm and an assistant port, allowing for surgical efficiency without compromising patient outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于机器人骶尾部结肠切除术的缝合针管理装置和新型端口配置。
重要性机器人辅助骶尾部结肠切除术(SCP)是修复顶端盆腔器官脱垂的常用手术;因此,应探索新型设备和技术来提高该手术的安全性和有效性。本研究的目的是评估8毫米套管部位使用一次性缝合/针管理装置(StitchKit;Origami Surgical,Madison,NJ)进行机器人辅助SCP手术的安全性和有效性,该装置采用4臂配置,无辅助端口。研究设计这是一项回顾性病例系列研究,研究对象是2018年至2021年在一家三级中心接受机器人辅助SCP手术的患者。所有手术均使用四个 8 毫米机器人套管和 StitchKit 设备进行。我们的目标是回顾使用该技术的所有病例,以确定该方法是否能安全完成手术,以及是否存在并发症或不良事件。结果共有 422 名患者接受了机器人辅助 SCP 治疗盆腔器官脱垂。平均年龄为 60 ± 10 岁,平均体重指数为 27 ± 6(以体重(公斤)除以身高(米)的平方计算)。大多数患者为脱垂 3 期(73%),同时接受了子宫切除术(70%)。99%的病例(n = 416)是通过机器人完成的。在所有机器人病例中,StitchKit 都能成功插入和取出,针数正确无误。所有患者均接受了术后访视,80%的患者接受了3个月的随访。结论使用四臂机器人配置和缝合套件设备可以安全地进行机器人辅助 SCP。这种设置省去了大于 8 毫米的切口和辅助端口,提高了手术效率,同时不影响患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Staged Versus Concomitant Stress Incontinence Procedures With Prolapse Repairs The Effect of a Physician Consultation on Patient Reported Outcomes in Urogynecology 16th EUGA Annual Congress 19-21 October 2023, Varese – Palais des Congrès Laser and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Access to Urogynecologic Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mystery Caller Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1