Intradialytic massage for leg cramps among hemodialysis patients: A single-center, randomized crossover trial

SciEnggJ Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.54645/202417supejr-14
Krizia Mari Anne Ramos-Daguman, Ed Jico Conde, Henry Angelo Go, Vince Bryan Viscayno, Monalisa Lim Dungca, Marissa Elizabeth Lim
{"title":"Intradialytic massage for leg cramps among hemodialysis patients: A single-center, randomized crossover trial","authors":"Krizia Mari Anne Ramos-Daguman, Ed Jico Conde, Henry Angelo Go, Vince Bryan Viscayno, Monalisa Lim Dungca, Marissa Elizabeth Lim","doi":"10.54645/202417supejr-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Leg cramps are commonly experienced by hemodialysis patients, and its persistence may lead to treatment noncompliance. Limited studies are available examining the efficacy of intradialytic massage on reducing leg cramps. Objectives: To determine the efficacy of intradialytic leg massage on reducing leg cramps among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis at the East Avenue Medical Center. Methodology: This is a single-center, randomized crossover trial. A total of 44 adult patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups—Group A (intradialytic massage followed by control) and Group B (control followed by intradialytic massage). Each patient underwent the first assigned intervention for 2 weeks, followed by a washout period of 4 weeks, then the second intervention was performed for another 2 weeks. The primary outcomes were the change in frequency, duration, and intensity of cramps. The secondary outcome was patient quality of life. Results: A higher proportion of patients during the intervention period did not experience cramps post-intervention than during the control period; however, the results were not statistically significant (p=0.2059). The median change in frequency, duration, and intensity of leg cramps did not significantly differ between intervention and control (p>0.05). Moreover, quality of life measures were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Intradialytic massage alone is not efficacious in reducing leg cramp frequency, duration, and intensity. Moreover, intradialytic massage failed to improve the quality of life of patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. Underlying factors that lead to leg cramps should be addressed through comprehensive and individualized interventions.","PeriodicalId":518923,"journal":{"name":"SciEnggJ","volume":"35 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SciEnggJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54645/202417supejr-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Leg cramps are commonly experienced by hemodialysis patients, and its persistence may lead to treatment noncompliance. Limited studies are available examining the efficacy of intradialytic massage on reducing leg cramps. Objectives: To determine the efficacy of intradialytic leg massage on reducing leg cramps among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis at the East Avenue Medical Center. Methodology: This is a single-center, randomized crossover trial. A total of 44 adult patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups—Group A (intradialytic massage followed by control) and Group B (control followed by intradialytic massage). Each patient underwent the first assigned intervention for 2 weeks, followed by a washout period of 4 weeks, then the second intervention was performed for another 2 weeks. The primary outcomes were the change in frequency, duration, and intensity of cramps. The secondary outcome was patient quality of life. Results: A higher proportion of patients during the intervention period did not experience cramps post-intervention than during the control period; however, the results were not statistically significant (p=0.2059). The median change in frequency, duration, and intensity of leg cramps did not significantly differ between intervention and control (p>0.05). Moreover, quality of life measures were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Intradialytic massage alone is not efficacious in reducing leg cramp frequency, duration, and intensity. Moreover, intradialytic massage failed to improve the quality of life of patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment. Underlying factors that lead to leg cramps should be addressed through comprehensive and individualized interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液透析患者腿部抽筋的椎管内按摩:单中心随机交叉试验
背景:腿部抽筋是血液透析患者的常见症状,其持续性可能导致患者不遵守治疗规定。有关血液透析内按摩对减轻腿部抽筋的疗效的研究十分有限。研究目的确定在东大街医疗中心接受维持性血液透析的患者中,椎管内腿部按摩对减轻腿部抽筋的效果。研究方法:这是一项单中心、随机交叉试验。共有 44 名成年患者按 1:1 的比例被随机分为两组--A 组(先进行椎管内按摩,再进行对照组治疗)和 B 组(先进行对照组治疗,再进行椎管内按摩)。每名患者先接受为期 2 周的第一种指定干预,然后是 4 周的冲洗期,接着再接受为期 2 周的第二种干预。主要结果是抽筋频率、持续时间和强度的变化。次要结果是患者的生活质量。结果:与对照组相比,干预期后未出现抽筋的患者比例更高,但结果无统计学意义(P=0.2059)。干预组和对照组在腿抽筋频率、持续时间和强度的中位数变化上没有显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,两组患者的生活质量也无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论单纯的椎管内按摩对减少腿部抽筋的频率、持续时间和强度没有效果。此外,椎管内按摩也无法改善血液透析患者的生活质量。应通过全面和个性化的干预措施来解决导致腿部抽筋的潜在因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of the organ-system integrated curriculum on the research productivity of a Philippine government medical school: An ARIMA-based bibliometric analysis Intradialytic massage for leg cramps among hemodialysis patients: A single-center, randomized crossover trial Diversity and novelty of venom peptides from Conus (Asprella) rolani revealed by analysis of its venom duct transcriptome Predictors of interdependent happiness among health science students during the COVID-19 pandemic Heated tobacco products: Potentials of harm reduction, improvement of indoor air quality and the need for further studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1