The association between single and dual use of cannabis and alcohol and driving under the influence and riding with an impaired driver in a large sample of Canadian adolescents

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Traffic Injury Prevention Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1080/15389588.2024.2342571
Mahmood R. Gohari , Karen A. Patte , Tara Elton-Marshall , Adam Cole , Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay , Richard Bélanger , Scott T. Leatherdale
{"title":"The association between single and dual use of cannabis and alcohol and driving under the influence and riding with an impaired driver in a large sample of Canadian adolescents","authors":"Mahmood R. Gohari ,&nbsp;Karen A. Patte ,&nbsp;Tara Elton-Marshall ,&nbsp;Adam Cole ,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Turcotte-Tremblay ,&nbsp;Richard Bélanger ,&nbsp;Scott T. Leatherdale","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2024.2342571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Dual use of cannabis and alcohol has increased in adolescents, but limited research has examined how it relates to impaired driving or riding with an impaired driver (IDR) compared to single substance use. This study aimed to examine the odds of alcohol- and/or cannabis-IDR among adolescents based on their use of alcohol and/or cannabis, and whether associations differed by gender and age.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional survey data were used from a sample of 69,621 students attending 182 Canadian secondary schools in the 2021/22 school year. Multilevel logistic regression estimated the odds of exclusive alcohol-IDR, exclusive cannabis-IDR, and both alcohol and cannabis IDR (alcohol-cannabis-IDR). Substance use interactions with gender and age were tested.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 14.7% of participants reported IDR; 7.5% reported exclusive alcohol-IDR, 3.2% reported exclusive cannabis-IDR, 4.0% reported alcohol-cannabis-IDR, and 7.4% were unsure if they had experienced IDR. The prevalence of IDR varied across substance use groups, 8.0% among nonuse, 21.9% among alcohol-only use, 35.9% among cannabis-only use, and 49.6% among dual use groups. Gender diverse, older, and students with lower socioeconomic status exhibited a higher likelihood of reporting alcohol-cannabis-IDR. Dual use was significantly associated with 9.5 times higher odds of alcohol-cannabis-IDR compared to alcohol-only use, and 3.0 times higher odds compared to cannabis-only use. Dual use was also associated with an increased likelihood of either alcohol- or cannabis-IDR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights that all students, regardless of substance use, are at risk of IDR, but students engaged in dual use of alcohol and cannabis face an elevated risk compared to both peers who do not use substances and those who use only a single substance. These findings emphasize the importance of targeted interventions that address the risks associated with IDR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":"25 6","pages":"Pages 765-773"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S153895882400047X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Dual use of cannabis and alcohol has increased in adolescents, but limited research has examined how it relates to impaired driving or riding with an impaired driver (IDR) compared to single substance use. This study aimed to examine the odds of alcohol- and/or cannabis-IDR among adolescents based on their use of alcohol and/or cannabis, and whether associations differed by gender and age.

Methods

Cross-sectional survey data were used from a sample of 69,621 students attending 182 Canadian secondary schools in the 2021/22 school year. Multilevel logistic regression estimated the odds of exclusive alcohol-IDR, exclusive cannabis-IDR, and both alcohol and cannabis IDR (alcohol-cannabis-IDR). Substance use interactions with gender and age were tested.

Results

Overall, 14.7% of participants reported IDR; 7.5% reported exclusive alcohol-IDR, 3.2% reported exclusive cannabis-IDR, 4.0% reported alcohol-cannabis-IDR, and 7.4% were unsure if they had experienced IDR. The prevalence of IDR varied across substance use groups, 8.0% among nonuse, 21.9% among alcohol-only use, 35.9% among cannabis-only use, and 49.6% among dual use groups. Gender diverse, older, and students with lower socioeconomic status exhibited a higher likelihood of reporting alcohol-cannabis-IDR. Dual use was significantly associated with 9.5 times higher odds of alcohol-cannabis-IDR compared to alcohol-only use, and 3.0 times higher odds compared to cannabis-only use. Dual use was also associated with an increased likelihood of either alcohol- or cannabis-IDR.

Conclusions

This study highlights that all students, regardless of substance use, are at risk of IDR, but students engaged in dual use of alcohol and cannabis face an elevated risk compared to both peers who do not use substances and those who use only a single substance. These findings emphasize the importance of targeted interventions that address the risks associated with IDR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大青少年大样本中单一或双重使用大麻和酒精与酒后驾车和与酒驾司机同乘之间的关系。
目的青少年使用大麻和酒精的情况有所增加,但与单一药物使用相比,对其与受损驾驶或与受损驾驶者同乘(IDR)之间关系的研究却很有限。本研究旨在根据青少年使用酒精和/或大麻的情况,研究他们发生酒精和/或大麻导致的驾驶受损的几率,以及这种关联是否因性别和年龄而异。方法采用横断面调查数据,样本来自 2021/22 学年就读于加拿大 182 所中学的 69,621 名学生。多层次逻辑回归估算了完全酒精-IDR、完全大麻-IDR、酒精和大麻IDR(酒精-大麻-IDR)的几率。结果总体而言,14.7% 的参与者报告了 IDR;7.5% 的参与者报告了完全的酒精-IDR,3.2% 的参与者报告了完全的大麻-IDR,4.0% 的参与者报告了酒精-大麻-IDR,7.4% 的参与者不确定他们是否经历过 IDR。不同药物使用群体的 IDR 发生率各不相同,不使用药物群体的 IDR 发生率为 8.0%,只使用酒精群体的 IDR 发生率为 21.9%,只使用大麻群体的 IDR 发生率为 35.9%,双重使用药物群体的 IDR 发生率为 49.6%。不同性别、年龄较大和社会经济地位较低的学生报告酗酒-吸食大麻-IDR的可能性较高。与只酗酒相比,双重使用酒精-大麻-IDR 的几率高出 9.5 倍,与只使用大麻相比,高出 3.0 倍。本研究强调,所有学生,无论使用何种物质,都有 IDR 的风险,但与不使用物质的同龄人和只使用单一物质的同龄人相比,双重使用酒精和大麻的学生面临的风险更高。这些发现强调了采取有针对性的干预措施以应对与 IDR 相关的风险的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Texting, talking, trawling and tunes: Risk perceptions, phone dependence and different types of phone use while driving behaviors. Effect of load limiting the shoulder-belt on right-front passenger kinematics in oblique-offset and NCAP frontal crash tests. Exploring the barriers and facilitators of helmet use among motorcyclists: A qualitative study. Prediction of traffic accident risk based on vehicle trajectory data. Rear passenger restraint in frontal NCAP tests compared to the right-front passenger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1