Learning Relational Categories: Benefits of Blocking, Classification, and Subject-Specific Examples

Tim M. Steininger, Jörg Wittwer, Thamar Voss
{"title":"Learning Relational Categories: Benefits of Blocking, Classification, and Subject-Specific Examples","authors":"Tim M. Steininger, Jörg Wittwer, Thamar Voss","doi":"10.1177/14757257241248155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to make informed instructional decisions, teachers need psychological knowledge about relational categories. We conducted two 2 × 2 experiments to examine effective designs for learning relational categories in the context of teacher education. In both experiments, a blocked compared to an interleaved example format was more beneficial for learning relational categories when generating new examples. Experiment 1 ( N = 176) additionally showed that student teachers generated new examples more successfully when they had to classify rather than read examples. Moreover, Experiment 2 ( N = 95) revealed that student teachers who learned with examples taken from their individual subjects rather than examples from random subjects generated new examples more successfully. A mediation analysis showed that the subject-specific task value mediated the effect on example generation. The detrimental effects of an interleaved format could be partly compensated for by learning with subject-specific examples.","PeriodicalId":345415,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Learning & Teaching","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Learning & Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257241248155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to make informed instructional decisions, teachers need psychological knowledge about relational categories. We conducted two 2 × 2 experiments to examine effective designs for learning relational categories in the context of teacher education. In both experiments, a blocked compared to an interleaved example format was more beneficial for learning relational categories when generating new examples. Experiment 1 ( N = 176) additionally showed that student teachers generated new examples more successfully when they had to classify rather than read examples. Moreover, Experiment 2 ( N = 95) revealed that student teachers who learned with examples taken from their individual subjects rather than examples from random subjects generated new examples more successfully. A mediation analysis showed that the subject-specific task value mediated the effect on example generation. The detrimental effects of an interleaved format could be partly compensated for by learning with subject-specific examples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习关系类别:分块、分类和特定主题示例的好处
为了做出明智的教学决策,教师需要有关关系类别的心理学知识。我们进行了两个 2 × 2 实验,以研究在教师教育背景下学习关系类别的有效设计。在这两个实验中,在生成新示例时,分块示例形式比交错示例形式更有利于学习关系类别。实验 1(N = 176)还表明,当学生教师需要对示例进行分类而不是阅读示例时,他们能更成功地生成新的示例。此外,实验 2(N = 95)显示,使用来自个别科目的范例而不是随机科目的范例进行学习的学生教师生成新范例的成功率更高。中介分析表明,特定学科的任务价值对范例生成的影响起中介作用。通过使用特定学科的示例进行学习,可以部分弥补交错形式的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supporting Prospective Teachers in Learning Psychology: A Digital Case Exploration Tool Learning Relational Categories: Benefits of Blocking, Classification, and Subject-Specific Examples Comparing ChatGPT With Experts’ Responses to Scenarios that Assess Psychological Literacy Editorial PLAT 23(1) 2024 Fostering Psychological Literacy and Student Well-Being Through the First-Year Course Connecting and Working with Nature: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1