Being an Anorectic versus Having Anorexia: Should the DSM Diagnostic Criteria Be Modified?

Melayna Schiff
{"title":"Being an Anorectic versus Having Anorexia: Should the DSM Diagnostic Criteria Be Modified?","authors":"Melayna Schiff","doi":"10.3138/ijfab-2023-1417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders classifies “anorexia nervosa” as a mental disorder, yet individuals with anorexia often characterize it as an identity. The author describes the identity of being an anorectic and compares it with what it takes to have anorexia in the diagnostic sense. This furthers the existing scholarship on anorexia and identity, most notably by revealing a disconnect between being an anorectic and having anorexia: Some individuals inhabit the identity of being an anorectic but do not have anorexia because they do not have a significantly low body weight. The author explores whether expanding the diagnostic criteria for anorexia would be beneficial for anorectics by examining the implications of classifying the identitive phenomenon of being an anorectic in terms of a medical concept of mental disorder. In the short term, the answer depends on whether being an anorectic calls for interventions that require a diagnosis. Either way, it would be beneficial to develop nonmedical frameworks for understanding anorexia that facilitate interventions that do not require a diagnosis. Understanding being an anorectic as an identity lays the scaffolding for a nonmedical way of conceptualizing anorexia that illuminates innovative approaches to assisting anorectics.","PeriodicalId":13383,"journal":{"name":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","volume":"55 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab-2023-1417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders classifies “anorexia nervosa” as a mental disorder, yet individuals with anorexia often characterize it as an identity. The author describes the identity of being an anorectic and compares it with what it takes to have anorexia in the diagnostic sense. This furthers the existing scholarship on anorexia and identity, most notably by revealing a disconnect between being an anorectic and having anorexia: Some individuals inhabit the identity of being an anorectic but do not have anorexia because they do not have a significantly low body weight. The author explores whether expanding the diagnostic criteria for anorexia would be beneficial for anorectics by examining the implications of classifying the identitive phenomenon of being an anorectic in terms of a medical concept of mental disorder. In the short term, the answer depends on whether being an anorectic calls for interventions that require a diagnosis. Either way, it would be beneficial to develop nonmedical frameworks for understanding anorexia that facilitate interventions that do not require a diagnosis. Understanding being an anorectic as an identity lays the scaffolding for a nonmedical way of conceptualizing anorexia that illuminates innovative approaches to assisting anorectics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厌食症患者与厌食症患者:是否应该修改 DSM 诊断标准?
精神障碍诊断与统计手册》将 "神经性厌食症 "归类为精神障碍,但厌食症患者往往将其视为一种身份。作者描述了厌食者的身份,并将其与诊断意义上的厌食症进行了比较。这进一步丰富了现有关于厌食症和身份的学术研究,尤其是揭示了厌食症患者与厌食症之间的脱节:有些人拥有厌食症患者的身份,但并没有患上厌食症,因为他们的体重并没有明显偏低。作者探讨了扩大厌食症的诊断标准是否对厌食症患者有益,研究了将厌食症患者的身份现象归类为精神障碍这一医学概念的影响。从短期来看,答案取决于厌食症患者是否需要进行需要诊断的干预。无论如何,建立非医学框架来理解厌食症都是有益的,它有助于采取无需诊断的干预措施。将厌食症患者理解为一种身份,为以非医学的方式将厌食症概念化奠定了基础,从而为帮助厌食症患者提供创新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Being an Anorectic versus Having Anorexia: Should the DSM Diagnostic Criteria Be Modified? Diagnosing Desire: Biopolitics and Femininity into the Twenty-First Century by Alyson K. Spurgas (review) Introduction to the Symposium on Daniel Groll's Conceiving People Significant Interests and the Right to Know Being the Right Kind of Parent: Conceiving People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1