Lesson study in science teacher preparation programs: a literature review

Tammy Kraft, Omar Hernández Rodríguez
{"title":"Lesson study in science teacher preparation programs: a literature review","authors":"Tammy Kraft, Omar Hernández Rodríguez","doi":"10.1108/ijlls-12-2023-0181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article aims to identify and describe the research outcomes of studies that have employed the theoretical framework of lesson study (LS) in initial science teacher preparation programs. The focus is on the impact of LS on preservice teachers’ (PST) pedagogical and content knowledge, beliefs, routines and norms for professional learning and instructional practices.Design/methodology/approachA systematic approach was employed to compile pertinent literature by initially searching scholarly databases using specific keywords and phrases related to prospective science teacher preparation. Seventeen studies, encompassing both qualitative research and mixed-methods research, met the inclusion criteria and significantly contributed to the study’s findings. The authors independently conducted a coding process, applying a predefined code scheme based on Lewis et al.'s (2019) theoretical framework. The outcomes of the coding process were compared, and reliability tests were conducted to ensure the consistency of the coding.FindingsIn preservice science teacher (PSST) education, LS proves transformative, enriching pedagogical and content knowledge, shaping beliefs, fostering collaboration and influencing instructional practices. Its collaborative, reflective and iterative nature significantly contributes to the professional growth of preservice science teachers, preparing them for effective, student-centered teaching practices. Further investigation is warranted in the realm of LS, particularly concerning preservice science teachers and their beliefs.Originality/valueThis literature review on science PSTs is one of the pioneering efforts to employ the professional development framework crafted by Lewis et al. (2019).","PeriodicalId":408622,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-12-2023-0181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to identify and describe the research outcomes of studies that have employed the theoretical framework of lesson study (LS) in initial science teacher preparation programs. The focus is on the impact of LS on preservice teachers’ (PST) pedagogical and content knowledge, beliefs, routines and norms for professional learning and instructional practices.Design/methodology/approachA systematic approach was employed to compile pertinent literature by initially searching scholarly databases using specific keywords and phrases related to prospective science teacher preparation. Seventeen studies, encompassing both qualitative research and mixed-methods research, met the inclusion criteria and significantly contributed to the study’s findings. The authors independently conducted a coding process, applying a predefined code scheme based on Lewis et al.'s (2019) theoretical framework. The outcomes of the coding process were compared, and reliability tests were conducted to ensure the consistency of the coding.FindingsIn preservice science teacher (PSST) education, LS proves transformative, enriching pedagogical and content knowledge, shaping beliefs, fostering collaboration and influencing instructional practices. Its collaborative, reflective and iterative nature significantly contributes to the professional growth of preservice science teachers, preparing them for effective, student-centered teaching practices. Further investigation is warranted in the realm of LS, particularly concerning preservice science teachers and their beliefs.Originality/valueThis literature review on science PSTs is one of the pioneering efforts to employ the professional development framework crafted by Lewis et al. (2019).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学教师培养计划中的课程研究:文献综述
本文旨在确定和描述在科学教师初始培训项目中采用课程研究(LS)理论框架的研究成果。设计/方法/途径 通过使用与未来科学教师准备相关的特定关键词和短语搜索学术数据库,采用系统方法汇编相关文献。有 17 项研究(包括定性研究和混合方法研究)符合纳入标准,并对研究结果做出了重要贡献。作者根据刘易斯等人(2019 年)的理论框架,采用预定义的编码方案,独立开展了编码工作。研究结果在职前科学教师(PSST)教育中,LS 被证明是变革性的,它丰富了教学和内容知识、塑造了信念、促进了合作并影响了教学实践。其协作、反思和迭代的性质极大地促进了职前科学教师的专业成长,为他们开展有效的、以学生为中心的教学实践做好了准备。在LS领域,特别是关于职前科学教师及其信念方面,有必要开展进一步的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adapting lesson study for early-years practitioners Book review: Reforming lesson study in Japan: theories of action for schools as learning communities Book review: Lesson study with mathematics and science preservice teachers: finding the forms Lesson study in science teacher preparation programs: a literature review Design-based research to develop lesson study for transformative assessment: teachers’ reactions, learning, organizational support, and use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1