Estimating the Decayed, Missing, and Filled permanent Teeth (DMFT) index of the University of Split student population using the Monte Carlo method

St open Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI:10.48188/so.5.2
Dora Dodig, Darko Kero
{"title":"Estimating the Decayed, Missing, and Filled permanent Teeth (DMFT) index of the University of Split student population using the Monte Carlo method","authors":"Dora Dodig, Darko Kero","doi":"10.48188/so.5.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To generate data for the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Permanent Teeth (DMFT) index of the entire student popu-lation of the University of Split from three samples of differ-ent sizes using the Monte Carlo method.Methods: We collected data during clinical exercises in the courses ‘Restorative Dental Medicine 2’ and ‘Endodontics 2.’ All participants (n = 200) were students at the University of Split. We derived three samples from the collected data on the DMFT index – small (n = 50), medium-sized (n = 100), and the entire sample (n = 200). Afterwards, we ran Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) to derive DMFT index data for three student populations of 20 000 individuals each from those samples. The probabilities of individual outcomes for the DMFT index and its components, as well as their correla-tions, were entered as assumptions for the MCS.Results: The estimated mean DMFT index of the student population was 8.96 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.69, 99% CI = 8.91–9.00) for MCS 50, 9.12 (SD = 0.47, 99% CI = 9.08–9.21) for MCS 100, and 8.82 (SD = 0.36, 99% CI = 8.77–8.87) for MCS 200. Regarding the components of the DMFT index, the number of repaired teeth in MCS 50, MCS 100, and MCS 200 was most strongly correlated with the DMFT index, with R values of 0.84, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively. The estimated mean DMFT indices by MCS differed from the mean DMFT indices of the corresponding samples and each other by less than 1 point.Conclusions: The Monte Carlo method may be useful in es-timating the population means of clinical indices in dental medicine, including the DMFT index. According to the as-sumptions made for MCS in this study, the size of the origi-nal samples did not significantly affect the estimates of the parameters of the DMFT index.","PeriodicalId":422483,"journal":{"name":"St open","volume":"114 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48188/so.5.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To generate data for the Decayed, Missing, and Filled Permanent Teeth (DMFT) index of the entire student popu-lation of the University of Split from three samples of differ-ent sizes using the Monte Carlo method.Methods: We collected data during clinical exercises in the courses ‘Restorative Dental Medicine 2’ and ‘Endodontics 2.’ All participants (n = 200) were students at the University of Split. We derived three samples from the collected data on the DMFT index – small (n = 50), medium-sized (n = 100), and the entire sample (n = 200). Afterwards, we ran Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) to derive DMFT index data for three student populations of 20 000 individuals each from those samples. The probabilities of individual outcomes for the DMFT index and its components, as well as their correla-tions, were entered as assumptions for the MCS.Results: The estimated mean DMFT index of the student population was 8.96 (standard deviation (SD) = 0.69, 99% CI = 8.91–9.00) for MCS 50, 9.12 (SD = 0.47, 99% CI = 9.08–9.21) for MCS 100, and 8.82 (SD = 0.36, 99% CI = 8.77–8.87) for MCS 200. Regarding the components of the DMFT index, the number of repaired teeth in MCS 50, MCS 100, and MCS 200 was most strongly correlated with the DMFT index, with R values of 0.84, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively. The estimated mean DMFT indices by MCS differed from the mean DMFT indices of the corresponding samples and each other by less than 1 point.Conclusions: The Monte Carlo method may be useful in es-timating the population means of clinical indices in dental medicine, including the DMFT index. According to the as-sumptions made for MCS in this study, the size of the origi-nal samples did not significantly affect the estimates of the parameters of the DMFT index.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用蒙特卡洛法估算斯普利特大学学生群体的恒牙龋坏、缺失和填充(DMFT)指数
目的:使用蒙特卡洛方法,从三个不同规模的样本中生成斯普利特大学全体学生的恒牙龋坏、缺失和充填(DMFT)指数数据:我们在 "口腔修复医学 2 "和 "牙髓病学 2 "课程的临床实践中收集了数据。所有参与者(n = 200)都是斯普利特大学的学生。我们从收集到的 DMFT 指数数据中提取了三个样本--小型样本(n = 50)、中型样本(n = 100)和全部样本(n = 200)。然后,我们进行蒙特卡洛模拟(MCS),从这些样本中得出三个学生群体的 DMFT 指数数据,每个群体有 20 000 个个体。DMFT 指数及其组成部分的个体结果概率以及它们之间的相关性被输入作为蒙特卡洛模拟的假设条件:估计学生群体的 DMFT 指数平均值为:MCS 50 为 8.96(标准差 (SD) = 0.69,99% CI = 8.91-9.00),MCS 100 为 9.12(标准差 = 0.47,99% CI = 9.08-9.21),MCS 200 为 8.82(标准差 = 0.36,99% CI = 8.77-8.87)。关于DMFT指数的组成部分,MCS 50、MCS 100和MCS 200中修复牙齿的数量与DMFT指数的相关性最强,R值分别为0.84、0.82和0.77。按MCS估算的平均DMFT指数与相应样本的平均DMFT指数和彼此的平均DMFT指数相差不到1个点:蒙特卡洛法可用于估计包括 DMFT 指数在内的口腔医学临床指数的群体均值。根据本研究对蒙特卡洛方法的假设,原始样本的大小对 DMFT 指数参数的估计值没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimating the Decayed, Missing, and Filled permanent Teeth (DMFT) index of the University of Split student population using the Monte Carlo method Operational plan for responding to and rescuing works of art in the event of a fire The crime of perjury in the legislation of the Republic of Croatia Work disability due to cardiovascular diseases in newly diagnosed patients in Ukraine during the first year of the war (2022) compared to prior nine years (2013-2021) Development of a simple algorithm for linear accelerator construction and simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1