Perceived overqualification and subjective career success: Is harmonious or obsessive passion beneficial?

Aleksandra Luksyte, Joseph Alexandre Carpini
{"title":"Perceived overqualification and subjective career success: Is harmonious or obsessive passion beneficial?","authors":"Aleksandra Luksyte,&nbsp;Joseph Alexandre Carpini","doi":"10.1111/apps.12539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Perceived overqualification may be positively or negatively related to subjective career success. Integrating person-environment fit theory with the dualistic model of passion, we propose that both harmonious and obsessive passion may help reconcile misfit perceptions arising from feeling overqualified with implications for subjective career success. We argue the lack of work meaningfulness will explain the proposed buffering effects of work passion. We tested our moderated mediation model across two studies. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 422), we demonstrated that surgeons who reported being overqualified and who scored lower on harmonious passion experienced diminished work meaningfulness. Following on, surgeons reported heightened intentions to leave their surgical careers. We constructively replicated these results in a time-lagged Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 201) that included an additional measure of subjective career success—career performance. Across both Studies 1 and 2, obsessive passion did not moderate the proposed effects. The significant moderating result of harmonious, as opposed to obsessive, passion highlighted the importance of autonomous internalization for work in the achievement of subjective career success for workers who feel overqualified. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of this research, as well as articulate opportunities for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"73 4","pages":"2077-2106"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.12539","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perceived overqualification may be positively or negatively related to subjective career success. Integrating person-environment fit theory with the dualistic model of passion, we propose that both harmonious and obsessive passion may help reconcile misfit perceptions arising from feeling overqualified with implications for subjective career success. We argue the lack of work meaningfulness will explain the proposed buffering effects of work passion. We tested our moderated mediation model across two studies. In Study 1 (N = 422), we demonstrated that surgeons who reported being overqualified and who scored lower on harmonious passion experienced diminished work meaningfulness. Following on, surgeons reported heightened intentions to leave their surgical careers. We constructively replicated these results in a time-lagged Study 2 (N = 201) that included an additional measure of subjective career success—career performance. Across both Studies 1 and 2, obsessive passion did not moderate the proposed effects. The significant moderating result of harmonious, as opposed to obsessive, passion highlighted the importance of autonomous internalization for work in the achievement of subjective career success for workers who feel overqualified. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of this research, as well as articulate opportunities for future research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知过高与主观事业成功:是和谐的激情有益,还是痴迷的激情有益?
感知到的资格过高可能与主观职业成功呈正相关,也可能呈负相关。将人与环境契合理论与激情的二元模型相结合,我们提出,和谐激情和痴迷激情都可能有助于调和因感觉资质过高而产生的不契合感,并对主观职业成功产生影响。我们认为,缺乏工作意义将解释所提出的工作激情的缓冲作用。我们在两项研究中测试了我们的调节中介模型。在研究 1(N = 422)中,我们证明了那些自称资质过高且在和谐激情方面得分较低的外科医生的工作意义减弱。随后,外科医生报告说,他们离开外科职业的意愿增强了。我们在一项时滞研究 2(N = 201)中建设性地复制了这些结果,该研究还包括一项额外的主观职业成功指标--职业表现。在研究 1 和研究 2 中,痴迷的激情并没有调节所提出的效应。和谐激情而非强迫激情的重要调节结果凸显了自主内化工作对那些感觉自己资质过高的员工取得主观职业成功的重要性。我们讨论了本研究的理论和实践意义,并阐明了未来研究的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
期刊最新文献
The double-edged sword effect of leader humor on employee thriving at work Synergistic or Siloed? Communicative practices in dual-earner parents' boundary navigation and implications for gendered work-family experiences The causal relation between career calling and task performance: A three-wave panel study A literature review of model fit and model comparisons with confirmatory factor analysis: Formalizing the informal in organizational science Cognitive biases and research miscitations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1