Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Regular and Vertically Irregular Residential Buildings in Nepal

Satish Paudel, Taufiq IIham Maulana IIham Maulana, H. Prayuda
{"title":"Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Regular and Vertically Irregular Residential Buildings in Nepal","authors":"Satish Paudel, Taufiq IIham Maulana IIham Maulana, H. Prayuda","doi":"10.22146/jcef.10316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need to assess the vulnerability of non-engineered residential RCC buildings in Nepal has become urgent, especially considering the ongoing modifications and additions to these structures without understanding their susceptibility to seismic events. Many residential buildings, particularly those up to three stories, did not fully comply to the guidelines outlined in Nepal Building Code NBC 105:2020. Therefore, there is a necessity to assess the seismic performance of these structures. This study aims to quantify the seismic vulnerability of such buildings by focusing on three distinct types: regular two and three-story structures, and irregular three-story structures. Using finite element modeling, the analysis of the buildings’ seismic capacity was performed through pushover analysis. Subsequently, linear time history analysis is conducted to determine the seismic demand. Two software were utilized to conduct the analyses, namely SAP2000 and STERA_3D. The study also includes the matching eleven strong ground motion inputs to Nepal’s site characteristics and response spectrum to ensure the relevance of the local context. Furthermore, fragility curves are constructed to compare the probability of structural failure, by first conducting the nonlinear dynamic analyses on the building specimens. The result showed that the probability of complete failure rises rapidly when an additional story is constructed with vertical irregularity, increasing from 1.8% to 5.7% in a non-engineered two-story building. The study also observes variations in top displacement across all three buildings due to differences in earthquake duration and frequency. From the findings, it is revealed that a significant increase in seismic vulnerability for vertically irregular buildings compared to regular ones","PeriodicalId":31890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum","volume":"101 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.10316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need to assess the vulnerability of non-engineered residential RCC buildings in Nepal has become urgent, especially considering the ongoing modifications and additions to these structures without understanding their susceptibility to seismic events. Many residential buildings, particularly those up to three stories, did not fully comply to the guidelines outlined in Nepal Building Code NBC 105:2020. Therefore, there is a necessity to assess the seismic performance of these structures. This study aims to quantify the seismic vulnerability of such buildings by focusing on three distinct types: regular two and three-story structures, and irregular three-story structures. Using finite element modeling, the analysis of the buildings’ seismic capacity was performed through pushover analysis. Subsequently, linear time history analysis is conducted to determine the seismic demand. Two software were utilized to conduct the analyses, namely SAP2000 and STERA_3D. The study also includes the matching eleven strong ground motion inputs to Nepal’s site characteristics and response spectrum to ensure the relevance of the local context. Furthermore, fragility curves are constructed to compare the probability of structural failure, by first conducting the nonlinear dynamic analyses on the building specimens. The result showed that the probability of complete failure rises rapidly when an additional story is constructed with vertical irregularity, increasing from 1.8% to 5.7% in a non-engineered two-story building. The study also observes variations in top displacement across all three buildings due to differences in earthquake duration and frequency. From the findings, it is revealed that a significant increase in seismic vulnerability for vertically irregular buildings compared to regular ones
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔规则和垂直不规则住宅建筑的地震脆弱性评估
评估尼泊尔非工程住宅 RCC 建筑的脆弱性已成为当务之急,特别是考虑到在不了解其地震易感性的情况下对这些建筑不断进行的改建和加建。许多住宅建筑,尤其是三层以下的建筑,并不完全符合尼泊尔《建筑规范》NBC 105:2020 中规定的准则。因此,有必要对这些建筑的抗震性能进行评估。本研究旨在量化此类建筑的抗震脆弱性,重点关注三种不同类型的建筑:规则的两层和三层结构,以及不规则的三层结构。利用有限元建模,通过推移分析对建筑物的抗震能力进行了分析。随后,通过线性时间历程分析来确定地震需求。分析使用了两种软件,即 SAP2000 和 STERA_3D。该研究还包括根据尼泊尔的场地特征和反应谱匹配 11 种强地震动输入,以确保与当地环境的相关性。此外,通过首先对建筑试件进行非线性动态分析,构建了脆性曲线以比较结构破坏的概率。结果表明,当增加一层垂直不规则建筑时,完全破坏的概率迅速上升,在非工程两层建筑中从 1.8% 上升到 5.7%。研究还观察到,由于地震持续时间和频率的不同,三栋建筑物的顶部位移也存在差异。研究结果表明,与规则建筑相比,垂直不规则建筑的地震易损性显著增加
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Airline Choice Decision for Jakarta-Denpasar Route During the Covid-19 Pandemic Comparative Seismic Analysis of G+20 RC Framed Structure Building for with and without Shear Walls Proposal and Evaluation of Vertical Vibration Theory of Air Caster Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Regular and Vertically Irregular Residential Buildings in Nepal Numerical Study on the Effects of Helix Diameter and Spacing on the Helical Pile Axial Bearing Capacity in Cohesionless Soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1