Comparative Seismic Analysis of G+20 RC Framed Structure Building for with and without Shear Walls

Dr Rohit Maheshwari
{"title":"Comparative Seismic Analysis of G+20 RC Framed Structure Building for with and without Shear Walls","authors":"Dr Rohit Maheshwari","doi":"10.22146/jcef.12854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of High-rise Reinforced Concrete (R.C.) design buildings with the shear wall is targeted to provide stability, simplicity of maintenance, and durability of the framed structure. The impacts of lateral loads, axial forces, shear forces, base shear, maximum story drift, and tensile forces are common in high-rise structural systems. The present paper analyses G+20 story R.C. framed buildings for base shear, maximum story displacement and bending moment behaviour of structures with and without shear walls under seismic loading. The building is located in Dehradun, and the load has been considered as per I.S. code 1893:2016. Framed has been analysed using E-tabs to identify maximum base shear for the concern load conditions. The result shows that the frame designed with an appropriate shear wall absorbs more lateral forces, and minimum displacement values are induced and resist maximum moments throughout the height of the building when a structure is appropriately configured with a shear wall. The structure configured with the shear walls has high resistance to absorb earthquake forces compared to structures without shear walls.","PeriodicalId":31890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum","volume":"7 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.12854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of High-rise Reinforced Concrete (R.C.) design buildings with the shear wall is targeted to provide stability, simplicity of maintenance, and durability of the framed structure. The impacts of lateral loads, axial forces, shear forces, base shear, maximum story drift, and tensile forces are common in high-rise structural systems. The present paper analyses G+20 story R.C. framed buildings for base shear, maximum story displacement and bending moment behaviour of structures with and without shear walls under seismic loading. The building is located in Dehradun, and the load has been considered as per I.S. code 1893:2016. Framed has been analysed using E-tabs to identify maximum base shear for the concern load conditions. The result shows that the frame designed with an appropriate shear wall absorbs more lateral forces, and minimum displacement values are induced and resist maximum moments throughout the height of the building when a structure is appropriately configured with a shear wall. The structure configured with the shear walls has high resistance to absorb earthquake forces compared to structures without shear walls.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有剪力墙和无剪力墙 G+20 RC 框架结构建筑的抗震对比分析
采用剪力墙设计的高层钢筋混凝土(R.C.)建筑的性能目标是提供框架结构的稳定性、维护简便性和耐久性。在高层建筑结构系统中,横向荷载、轴向力、剪力、基底剪力、最大层间漂移和拉力的影响十分常见。本文分析了 G+20 层 R.C. 框架结构建筑在地震荷载下有剪力墙和无剪力墙结构的基础剪力、最大层间位移和弯矩行为。该建筑位于德拉敦,荷载按照 I.S. 规范 1893:2016 考虑。使用 E-tabs 对框架进行了分析,以确定相关荷载条件下的最大基底剪力。结果表明,当结构适当配置剪力墙时,设计有适当剪力墙的框架可吸收更多侧向力,产生最小位移值,并在整个建筑高度内抵抗最大力矩。与不带剪力墙的结构相比,带剪力墙的结构吸收地震力的能力更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Airline Choice Decision for Jakarta-Denpasar Route During the Covid-19 Pandemic Comparative Seismic Analysis of G+20 RC Framed Structure Building for with and without Shear Walls Proposal and Evaluation of Vertical Vibration Theory of Air Caster Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Regular and Vertically Irregular Residential Buildings in Nepal Numerical Study on the Effects of Helix Diameter and Spacing on the Helical Pile Axial Bearing Capacity in Cohesionless Soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1