Perceived Values of Public Participation Practices in Budgeting: Insights From Incorporated Local Governments in Oregon

Q2 Social Sciences State and Local Government Review Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.1177/0160323x241245433
Frankline Muthomi
{"title":"Perceived Values of Public Participation Practices in Budgeting: Insights From Incorporated Local Governments in Oregon","authors":"Frankline Muthomi","doi":"10.1177/0160323x241245433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This field notes provide insights into how local officials value different participatory procedures used to inform and invite the public to participation activities, and participatory mechanisms used to solicit public input during budget decision-making processes. The analysis is based on a framework that helps categorize and assess traditional, non-digital participatory practices versus modern, digital ones. Using survey responses from local officials in Oregon, the findings reveal greater value for modern methods like government websites and social media to inform and invite residents to public participation activities, but more traditional methods like public hearings and citizen committees to solicit their input. The author offers practical suggestions for fostering meaningful public engagement, and the need for practitioners is to be adaptable to innovative strategies that guarantees their participatory procedures and mechanisms are inclusive, accessible, and responsive to the changing needs of communities.","PeriodicalId":52260,"journal":{"name":"State and Local Government Review","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State and Local Government Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x241245433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This field notes provide insights into how local officials value different participatory procedures used to inform and invite the public to participation activities, and participatory mechanisms used to solicit public input during budget decision-making processes. The analysis is based on a framework that helps categorize and assess traditional, non-digital participatory practices versus modern, digital ones. Using survey responses from local officials in Oregon, the findings reveal greater value for modern methods like government websites and social media to inform and invite residents to public participation activities, but more traditional methods like public hearings and citizen committees to solicit their input. The author offers practical suggestions for fostering meaningful public engagement, and the need for practitioners is to be adaptable to innovative strategies that guarantees their participatory procedures and mechanisms are inclusive, accessible, and responsive to the changing needs of communities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预算编制中公众参与实践的认知价值:俄勒冈州地方政府法人的见解
这篇实地记录深入分析了地方官员如何重视用于通知和邀请公众参与活动的不同参与程序,以及用于在预算决策过程中征求公众意见的参与机制。分析以一个框架为基础,该框架有助于对传统的、非数字化的参与实践与现代的、数字化的参与实践进行分类和评估。通过对俄勒冈州地方官员的调查反馈,研究结果显示,政府网站和社交媒体等现代方法在通知和邀请居民参与公众参与活动方面更有价值,而听证会和公民委员会等传统方法在征求居民意见方面则更有价值。作者为促进有意义的公众参与提供了实用建议,从业者需要适应创新战略,以保证其参与程序和机制具有包容性、可及性,并能满足社区不断变化的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
State and Local Government Review
State and Local Government Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
State Partisan Dominance and the Distribution of TANF Funds, 2000–2018 Policy Learning and the Diffusion of Autonomous Vehicle Policy in the American States Political Drivers of State Fiscal Cyclicality She Said Yes! An Exploration of Confidence Among Women Who Run for Political Office Do Local Fiscal Decisions Impact Economic Growth: The Case of Wisconsin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1