State Partisan Dominance and the Distribution of TANF Funds, 2000–2018

Q2 Social Sciences State and Local Government Review Pub Date : 2024-07-27 DOI:10.1177/0160323x241262047
Jonathan Winburn, Robert Brown, Nichole Gligor
{"title":"State Partisan Dominance and the Distribution of TANF Funds, 2000–2018","authors":"Jonathan Winburn, Robert Brown, Nichole Gligor","doi":"10.1177/0160323x241262047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this field note, we examine the changing distribution of TANF spending patterns across the states. Given the important shift from the more restrictive categorical grant of AFDC to the more flexible block grant of TANF, examining patterns of spending across program categories is an important facet for understanding states’ welfare efforts. Overall, there has been a general decrease in the percentage of state TANF spending on cash assistance. Using a new measure of party dominance, we find that Democratic states initially spent a higher share of their TANF funds on cash assistance than Republican states. However, by the 2010s this partisan difference basically disappeared with Democratic states spending patterns matching those of Republican states, focusing less on cash assistance and giving greater priority to areas less reflective of TANF’s principal objectives.","PeriodicalId":52260,"journal":{"name":"State and Local Government Review","volume":"84 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State and Local Government Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x241262047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this field note, we examine the changing distribution of TANF spending patterns across the states. Given the important shift from the more restrictive categorical grant of AFDC to the more flexible block grant of TANF, examining patterns of spending across program categories is an important facet for understanding states’ welfare efforts. Overall, there has been a general decrease in the percentage of state TANF spending on cash assistance. Using a new measure of party dominance, we find that Democratic states initially spent a higher share of their TANF funds on cash assistance than Republican states. However, by the 2010s this partisan difference basically disappeared with Democratic states spending patterns matching those of Republican states, focusing less on cash assistance and giving greater priority to areas less reflective of TANF’s principal objectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2000-2018 年各州党派主导地位与 TANF 资金分配情况
在本实地说明中,我们研究了各州 TANF 支出模式不断变化的分布情况。鉴于从限制性更强的分类补助(AFDC)向更灵活的整体补助(TANF)的重要转变,研究各计划类别的支出模式是了解各州福利工作的一个重要方面。总体而言,各州用于现金援助的 TANF 支出比例普遍下降。通过使用一种新的政党优势衡量方法,我们发现民主党各州最初用于现金援助的 TANF 资金比例高于共和党各州。然而,到了 2010 年代,这种党派差异基本消失,民主党各州的支出模式与共和党各州一致,减少了对现金援助的关注,而更多地优先考虑那些较少反映 TANF 主要目标的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
State and Local Government Review
State and Local Government Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
State Partisan Dominance and the Distribution of TANF Funds, 2000–2018 Policy Learning and the Diffusion of Autonomous Vehicle Policy in the American States Political Drivers of State Fiscal Cyclicality She Said Yes! An Exploration of Confidence Among Women Who Run for Political Office Do Local Fiscal Decisions Impact Economic Growth: The Case of Wisconsin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1