Effects of Land Preparation Method and Organic Soil Amendment on Soil Properties, Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays)

Victor Kiptoo Kemboi, Peter Masinde, Eric Mworia, John Mworia, R. Kirigiah
{"title":"Effects of Land Preparation Method and Organic Soil Amendment on Soil Properties, Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea mays)","authors":"Victor Kiptoo Kemboi, Peter Masinde, Eric Mworia, John Mworia, R. Kirigiah","doi":"10.9734/ajahr/2024/v11i2315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important food crop popular in Kenya and its production has a direct influence to nutrition and economic security. The high demand for this food crop has resulted to innovation of new farming practices to increase its production. Therefore, this experiment was set up at Meru University Demonstration Farm in randomized complete block (RCBD) split plot design during June - October 2022 (S1) and November - March 2023 (S2). Two land preparation methods were used conservational and conventional (CA and CT). The organic amendments were 2.5 t ha-1 BSF, 5.5 t ha-1 BSF, 8.5 t ha-1 BSF, 2.5 t ha-1 BSF + Biochar, 5.5 t ha-1 BSF + Biochar, 2.5 t ha-1 BSF + Trichoderma 125 g ha-1, 5.5 t ha-1 BSF + Trichoderma 125 g ha-1, 5 t ha-1 FYM, 100 kg              N ha-1 DAP and control. Data collected was on soil bulk density, soil moisture, vegetative growth and yields. There was significance (p<0.05) difference between the two land preparation method on soil moisture retention. Organic amendments influenced the soil moisture retention and soil bulk density reduction significantly (p<0.05). Plots with 8.5 t ha-1 BSF and 100 kg N ha-1 DAP increased the vegetative growth by 37%, application of Trichoderma increased the vegetative growth by 7%. CA increased the vegetative growth by 6% and 4% as compared to CT.  8.5 t ha-1 BSF increased the vegetative growth by 21% and 19%.  CA increased the yields by 6% in S1 and 14% in S2 compared to CT. Trichoderma increased the yields of maize by 12% and 11%. Increase in maize yield and vegetative growth is due to increased soil moisture condition in CA. Addition of BSF manure and biochar improved the soil moisture retention, reduced soil bulk density and improvement in soil nutrient content which led to an increase in growth and yield.","PeriodicalId":474789,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of agricultural and horticultural research","volume":"75 s321","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of agricultural and horticultural research","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajahr/2024/v11i2315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important food crop popular in Kenya and its production has a direct influence to nutrition and economic security. The high demand for this food crop has resulted to innovation of new farming practices to increase its production. Therefore, this experiment was set up at Meru University Demonstration Farm in randomized complete block (RCBD) split plot design during June - October 2022 (S1) and November - March 2023 (S2). Two land preparation methods were used conservational and conventional (CA and CT). The organic amendments were 2.5 t ha-1 BSF, 5.5 t ha-1 BSF, 8.5 t ha-1 BSF, 2.5 t ha-1 BSF + Biochar, 5.5 t ha-1 BSF + Biochar, 2.5 t ha-1 BSF + Trichoderma 125 g ha-1, 5.5 t ha-1 BSF + Trichoderma 125 g ha-1, 5 t ha-1 FYM, 100 kg              N ha-1 DAP and control. Data collected was on soil bulk density, soil moisture, vegetative growth and yields. There was significance (p<0.05) difference between the two land preparation method on soil moisture retention. Organic amendments influenced the soil moisture retention and soil bulk density reduction significantly (p<0.05). Plots with 8.5 t ha-1 BSF and 100 kg N ha-1 DAP increased the vegetative growth by 37%, application of Trichoderma increased the vegetative growth by 7%. CA increased the vegetative growth by 6% and 4% as compared to CT.  8.5 t ha-1 BSF increased the vegetative growth by 21% and 19%.  CA increased the yields by 6% in S1 and 14% in S2 compared to CT. Trichoderma increased the yields of maize by 12% and 11%. Increase in maize yield and vegetative growth is due to increased soil moisture condition in CA. Addition of BSF manure and biochar improved the soil moisture retention, reduced soil bulk density and improvement in soil nutrient content which led to an increase in growth and yield.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整地方法和有机土壤改良剂对土壤特性、玉米(Zea mays)生长和产量的影响
玉米(Zea mays L.)是肯尼亚流行的一种重要粮食作物,其生产对营养和经济安全有着直接影响。由于对这种粮食作物的需求量很大,因此需要创新新的耕作方法来提高产量。因此,在 2022 年 6 月至 10 月(S1)和 2023 年 11 月至 3 月(S2)期间,在梅鲁大学示范农场进行了随机整群(RCBD)分块设计试验。采用了两种土地整理方法,分别是保护性整理和常规整理(CA 和 CT)。有机改良剂为 2.5 吨/公顷 BSF、5.5 吨/公顷 BSF、8.5 吨/公顷 BSF、2.5 吨/公顷 BSF + 生物炭、5.5 吨/公顷 BSF + 生物炭、2.5 吨/公顷 BSF + 毛霉 125 克/公顷、5.5 吨/公顷 BSF + 毛霉 125 克/公顷、5 吨/公顷 FYM、100 千克氮/公顷 DAP 和对照。收集的数据包括土壤容重、土壤水分、植株生长和产量。两种整地方法对土壤保墒的影响差异显著(p<0.05)。有机添加剂对土壤保墒和土壤容重降低有显著影响(p<0.05)。施用 8.5 t ha-1 BSF 和 100 kg N ha-1 DAP 的地块无性系生长量提高了 37%,施用毛霉的地块无性系生长量提高了 7%。与 CT 相比,CA 的无性生长分别提高了 6% 和 4%。 8.5 吨/公顷 BSF 可使无性系生长分别提高 21% 和 19%。 与 CT 相比,CA 使 S1 和 S2 的产量分别提高了 6% 和 14%。毛霉使玉米产量分别提高了 12% 和 11%。玉米产量和植株生长的增加是由于 CA 中土壤水分条件的改善。添加 BSF 肥料和生物炭提高了土壤保湿性,降低了土壤容重,改善了土壤养分含量,从而提高了生长和产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Production of Biofuels from Agricultural Waste Assessment of Endogenous Soil Fertility to Update Fertilization of Maize (Zea mays L) Crops in the Savannah Region of Togo Controlling Diseases in Porang Plants (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) Using Endophytic Fungi In vitro Impact of Nitrogen and Spacing on Onion (Allium cepa L.) Growth in Southern Tigray, Ethiopia Impact of Climate Change on Soil Wetness and Cocoa Production in Ondo State, Nigeria: Implication for Sustainable Farming Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1