From exclusion to establishment: Organizational birthmarks and imprinting within populist parties

Johan Erik Andersen, Jarle Trondal
{"title":"From exclusion to establishment: Organizational birthmarks and imprinting within populist parties","authors":"Johan Erik Andersen, Jarle Trondal","doi":"10.1111/1467-9477.12272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper bridges literature on political parties and organizational studies by providing a new theoretical lens on political party developments. There has been growing scholarly interest in populist parties and the issues that serve as the raison d'être for their political platform. While the literature has been preoccupied with the journey of the anti‐hero rising to power, less has been written about the organization of the party once it has transcended to political influence. Likewise, whereas organizational birthmarks and imprinting have been integral concepts in the study of organizations, there has been little permeation of the concepts into the study of political parties. The Danish People's Party and Norwegian Progress Party provide two illustrative cases, showing that their original formation and later transformation into the current parties brought with it challenges to their structure and ideology. Our findings show that while an increase in external support to the political party, that is, votes, imprints organizational birthmarks, it is during a decrease in the very same external support that organizational birthmarks are uncovered and challenged. Through process‐tracing and our theoretical model, we identify organizational birthmarks and causal mechanisms in which competing organizational birthmarks create an internal division within the political party.","PeriodicalId":509462,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Political Studies","volume":"31 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Political Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper bridges literature on political parties and organizational studies by providing a new theoretical lens on political party developments. There has been growing scholarly interest in populist parties and the issues that serve as the raison d'être for their political platform. While the literature has been preoccupied with the journey of the anti‐hero rising to power, less has been written about the organization of the party once it has transcended to political influence. Likewise, whereas organizational birthmarks and imprinting have been integral concepts in the study of organizations, there has been little permeation of the concepts into the study of political parties. The Danish People's Party and Norwegian Progress Party provide two illustrative cases, showing that their original formation and later transformation into the current parties brought with it challenges to their structure and ideology. Our findings show that while an increase in external support to the political party, that is, votes, imprints organizational birthmarks, it is during a decrease in the very same external support that organizational birthmarks are uncovered and challenged. Through process‐tracing and our theoretical model, we identify organizational birthmarks and causal mechanisms in which competing organizational birthmarks create an internal division within the political party.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从排斥到建立:民粹主义政党内部的组织胎记和印记
本文为政党发展提供了一个新的理论视角,在政党和组织研究文献之间架起了一座桥梁。学术界对民粹主义政党及其政治纲领存在理由的关注与日俱增。虽然相关文献一直专注于反英雄人物崛起的历程,但对于政党一旦超越政治影响力后的组织情况却鲜有论述。同样,组织胎记和印记一直是组织研究中不可或缺的概念,但这些概念却很少渗透到政党研究中。丹麦人民党和挪威进步党提供了两个说明性案例,表明它们最初的成立以及后来转变为当前政党的过程中,其结构和意识形态都面临着挑战。我们的研究结果表明,虽然政党获得的外部支持(即选票)的增加会打上组织的烙印,但正是在外部支持减少的过程中,组织的烙印才会被发现并受到挑战。通过过程追踪和我们的理论模型,我们确定了组织胎记以及相互竞争的组织胎记造成政党内部分裂的因果机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Home is where the heart is? A comparative analysis of Flemish and Danish parties' organizational linkages with the EU What is at stake and what does it take? Collaborative governance and policy (in)action in the adoption of a National Forest Programme The view of freedom that shaped the Swedish welfare state Party competition on social media: Evidence from politicians' tweets Interest group resources, access, and influence: An empirical review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1