Awareness and adoption of anti-plagiarism software in India: A case study of ShodhShuddhi

Varsha Singh, A. K. Singh
{"title":"Awareness and adoption of anti-plagiarism software in India: A case study of ShodhShuddhi","authors":"Varsha Singh, A. K. Singh","doi":"10.1177/09557490241247208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic writing is essential for researchers to present the research output in a legitimate manner with a precise and clear representation of research data, but few have mastered the art of writing well. Research and researchers are responsible for upholding academic honesty, integrity, and ethics. Needless to say, plagiarism has been around since antiquity, but it has never been as pervasive as it is now. Plagiarism is gradually ingraining itself into our educational system. Pupils are increasingly using the Internet and ICT-based tools to find quick “shortcuts” to the worthwhile but time-consuming task of preparing research papers. Being the third-largest publishing nation, it is the duty of the stakeholders to uphold and work for publication excellence with research ethics and honesty. Since there are so many research articles being published, it is important to understand publishing ethics and anti-plagiarism software in the research domain. If authors are taking ideas from previously published documents or other authors’ works, it is important to ensure acknowledgment and credit in terms of citations, bibliographical references, providing in-text citations, footnotes, and quoting them in any standard citation style. Plagiarism can also be defined as the paraphrasing and text recycling of documents. The challenges in research, which compromise ethics, are also from different stages of research, which include fabrication and falsification of data, AI-based text-generating tools, test recycling, ghostwriting, image plagiarism, audio-to-text-converting tools, etc. A one-stop solution to address all these issues on a single platform is not feasible as it involves multi-level checks and proper policy blended to be implemented at many levels. In this paper, analysis and study examine the national awareness of anti-plagiarism software. The primary objectives of the study are to raise awareness and investigate the current state and status of the use of anti-plagiarism software in Bharat (PDS). The data was collected through the portals and websites of ShodhShuddhi, Shodhganga, and the INFLIBNET Centre. Initiated with 200 universities in the year 2015, about 1086 higher education institutions (HEIs) are provided with PDS under ShodhShuddhi, out of which 894 institutions are active in using software for checking similarities. Three years of usage by active institutions are taken for analysis and study by 1.3 lakh faculty members and research scholars. The increase in usage, even during COVID time, shows that awareness is created in the nation, and the percentage of similarity in first document submission is also coming down gradually in the nation. Character building in academic matters and innovations are key outcomes that can be achieved by addressing plagiarism to strive for a knowledge-based nation.","PeriodicalId":431623,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues","volume":"23 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09557490241247208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic writing is essential for researchers to present the research output in a legitimate manner with a precise and clear representation of research data, but few have mastered the art of writing well. Research and researchers are responsible for upholding academic honesty, integrity, and ethics. Needless to say, plagiarism has been around since antiquity, but it has never been as pervasive as it is now. Plagiarism is gradually ingraining itself into our educational system. Pupils are increasingly using the Internet and ICT-based tools to find quick “shortcuts” to the worthwhile but time-consuming task of preparing research papers. Being the third-largest publishing nation, it is the duty of the stakeholders to uphold and work for publication excellence with research ethics and honesty. Since there are so many research articles being published, it is important to understand publishing ethics and anti-plagiarism software in the research domain. If authors are taking ideas from previously published documents or other authors’ works, it is important to ensure acknowledgment and credit in terms of citations, bibliographical references, providing in-text citations, footnotes, and quoting them in any standard citation style. Plagiarism can also be defined as the paraphrasing and text recycling of documents. The challenges in research, which compromise ethics, are also from different stages of research, which include fabrication and falsification of data, AI-based text-generating tools, test recycling, ghostwriting, image plagiarism, audio-to-text-converting tools, etc. A one-stop solution to address all these issues on a single platform is not feasible as it involves multi-level checks and proper policy blended to be implemented at many levels. In this paper, analysis and study examine the national awareness of anti-plagiarism software. The primary objectives of the study are to raise awareness and investigate the current state and status of the use of anti-plagiarism software in Bharat (PDS). The data was collected through the portals and websites of ShodhShuddhi, Shodhganga, and the INFLIBNET Centre. Initiated with 200 universities in the year 2015, about 1086 higher education institutions (HEIs) are provided with PDS under ShodhShuddhi, out of which 894 institutions are active in using software for checking similarities. Three years of usage by active institutions are taken for analysis and study by 1.3 lakh faculty members and research scholars. The increase in usage, even during COVID time, shows that awareness is created in the nation, and the percentage of similarity in first document submission is also coming down gradually in the nation. Character building in academic matters and innovations are key outcomes that can be achieved by addressing plagiarism to strive for a knowledge-based nation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度对反剽窃软件的认识和采用:ShodhShuddhi 案例研究
学术写作对于研究人员以合法的方式展示研究成果、准确清晰地表述研究数据至关重要,但很少有人能很好地掌握写作艺术。研究和研究人员有责任维护学术诚信、正直和道德。毋庸讳言,剽窃行为自古有之,但从未像现在这样普遍。剽窃行为正逐渐融入我们的教育体系。学生们越来越多地使用互联网和基于信息通信技术的工具来寻找快速 "捷径",以完成撰写研究论文这项有价值但耗时的任务。作为第三大出版国,有关各方有责任以研究道德和诚信为基础,坚持并努力发表优秀的研究论文。由于发表的研究文章数量众多,因此了解研究领域的出版伦理和反抄袭软件非常重要。如果作者从以前发表的文献或其他作者的作品中获取灵感,必须确保在引文、书目参考、提供内文引文、脚注和以任何标准引文样式引用等方面予以承认和归功。剽窃也可以定义为对文件进行转述和文本再造。研究中有损伦理的挑战还来自研究的不同阶段,其中包括编造和伪造数据、基于人工智能的文本生成工具、测试回收、鬼画符、图像抄袭、音频到文本的转换工具等。在一个平台上一站式解决所有这些问题是不可行的,因为这涉及多层次的检查,需要在多个层面实施适当的政策。本文分析和研究了国民对反抄袭软件的认识。研究的主要目的是提高人们对反抄袭软件的认识,并调查巴拉特邦(PDS)使用反抄袭软件的现状和情况。数据是通过 ShodhShuddhi、Shodhganga 和 INFLIBNET 中心的门户和网站收集的。ShodhShuddhi 于 2015 年与 200 所大学合作,为约 1086 所高等教育机构(HEIs)提供了 PDS,其中 894 所机构积极使用软件检查相似性。有 130 万名教师和研究学者对活跃机构三年的使用情况进行了分析和研究。即使是在 COVID 期间,使用率也在不断提高,这表明全国人民的意识已经形成,全国首次提交文件的相似度百分比也在逐步下降。通过解决抄袭问题,可以在学术事务和创新方面培养品格,从而努力建设知识型国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of theories in Library and Information Science research in Tanzania: A content analysis Awareness and adoption of anti-plagiarism software in India: A case study of ShodhShuddhi Access to electronic information resources in law libraries during covid-19 period: The case of office of the director of public prosecutions library, Kenya Experiences, purposes, satisfaction and missing library services as predictors of library information services provision: A case study An assessment on the applicability of selection and acquisition procedures at Unguja Public Library - Zanzibar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1