Assessment and management of constipation in postoperative patients in the spinal surgery ward: a best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000423
Qin Luo, Yanting Li, Jia Guo, Jiarui Chen, Qirong Chen, Mei Sun
{"title":"Assessment and management of constipation in postoperative patients in the spinal surgery ward: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Qin Luo, Yanting Li, Jia Guo, Jiarui Chen, Qirong Chen, Mei Sun","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE\nConstipation is a common complication following spinal surgery that can result in distension, abdominal pain, infection, and even intestinal perforation. This study reports on an evidence-based implementation project to reduce the incidence of constipation in spinal surgery wards.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe project was conducted in the spinal surgery ward of a general tertiary hospital in Changsha City, China, from March to August 2022. We used the JBI Implementation Framework and the JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare for audits and feedback. Data were collected and analyzed using JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) software. Seven audit criteria were developed based on the best practice recommendations summarized by JBI. A baseline audit was conducted with 20 nurses and 50 patients in the spinal surgery ward, and a follow-up audit was conducted using the same sample size and setting.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe baseline audit revealed compliance below 46% for 5 of the 7 criteria. Strategies developed to address poor compliance included educating nurses and patients, developing a postoperative constipation risk assessment sheet, organizing stakeholder focus group meetings, establishing a constipation management routine, and effective empowerment of nurses. The follow-up audit showed positive compliance results, with the highest rate for criterion 7 (100%) and the greatest increase for criterion 2 (from 0% to 78%). Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative constipation decreased from 48% to 16%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe project improved compliance with audit criteria, reduced the incidence of constipation, and enhanced the efficiency of quality management in the spinal surgery ward.\n\n\nSPANISH ABSTRACT\nhttp://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A186.","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE Constipation is a common complication following spinal surgery that can result in distension, abdominal pain, infection, and even intestinal perforation. This study reports on an evidence-based implementation project to reduce the incidence of constipation in spinal surgery wards. METHODS The project was conducted in the spinal surgery ward of a general tertiary hospital in Changsha City, China, from March to August 2022. We used the JBI Implementation Framework and the JBI Model of Evidence-Based Healthcare for audits and feedback. Data were collected and analyzed using JBI's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) software. Seven audit criteria were developed based on the best practice recommendations summarized by JBI. A baseline audit was conducted with 20 nurses and 50 patients in the spinal surgery ward, and a follow-up audit was conducted using the same sample size and setting. RESULTS The baseline audit revealed compliance below 46% for 5 of the 7 criteria. Strategies developed to address poor compliance included educating nurses and patients, developing a postoperative constipation risk assessment sheet, organizing stakeholder focus group meetings, establishing a constipation management routine, and effective empowerment of nurses. The follow-up audit showed positive compliance results, with the highest rate for criterion 7 (100%) and the greatest increase for criterion 2 (from 0% to 78%). Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative constipation decreased from 48% to 16%. CONCLUSION The project improved compliance with audit criteria, reduced the incidence of constipation, and enhanced the efficiency of quality management in the spinal surgery ward. SPANISH ABSTRACT http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A186.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊柱外科病房术后患者便秘的评估和管理:最佳实践实施项目。
简介和目的便秘是脊柱手术后常见的并发症,可导致腹胀、腹痛、感染甚至肠穿孔。本研究报告了一项旨在降低脊柱外科病房便秘发生率的循证实施项目。方法该项目于 2022 年 3 月至 8 月在中国长沙市一家综合性三级甲等医院的脊柱外科病房开展。我们使用JBI实施框架和JBI循证医疗模型进行审核和反馈。我们使用JBI的临床证据实际应用系统(PACES)软件收集和分析数据。根据 JBI 总结的最佳实践建议,制定了七项审核标准。对脊柱外科病房的 20 名护士和 50 名患者进行了基线审核,并使用相同的样本量和环境进行了后续审核。结果基线审核显示,7 项标准中有 5 项的依从性低于 46%。为解决依从性差的问题而制定的策略包括:对护士和患者进行教育、制定术后便秘风险评估表、组织利益相关者焦点小组会议、建立便秘管理常规以及对护士进行有效授权。后续审计结果显示了积极的合规性,其中标准 7 的合规率最高(100%),标准 2 的合规率增幅最大(从 0% 提高到 78%)。此外,术后便秘发生率从 48% 降至 16%。结论该项目提高了审计标准的合规性,降低了便秘发生率,提高了脊柱外科病房质量管理的效率。西班牙文摘要http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A186。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics. Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example. Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project. Improving the quality of medication administration practices in a tertiary Australian hospital: a best practice implementation project. Cross-disciplinary advance care planning in oncology and palliative care amidst a pandemic: a best practice implementation project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1