PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF SPATIAL INTERPOLATIONS FOR TRAFFIC NOISE MAPPING ON UNDULATING AND LEVEL TERRAIN

N. Wickramathilaka, U. Ujang, S. Azri, T. Choon
{"title":"PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF SPATIAL INTERPOLATIONS FOR TRAFFIC NOISE MAPPING ON UNDULATING AND LEVEL TERRAIN","authors":"N. Wickramathilaka, U. Ujang, S. Azri, T. Choon","doi":"10.3846/gac.2024.18751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traffic noise mapping frequently employs Kriging, Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW), and Triangular Irregular Networks (TIN) spatial interpolations. This study uses the Henk de Kluijver noise model to evaluate the performance of spatial interpolations. Effective traffic noise mapping requires that noise observation points (Nops) be designed as 2 m grids. The upper and lower slopes function as noise barriers to reduce sound levels. Therefore, assessment of accuracy is essential for visualising noise levels in undulating and level terrain. In addition, this work gives an accurate comparison of traffic noise interpolation in undulating areas. The elements of spatial interpolations, such as the weighting factor, variogram, radius, and number of points influence the interpolation accuracy. The Kriging with a Gaussian variogram, where the radius is 5 m and the number of points is 12 demonstrates the highest level of precision. However, there is no direct relationship between accuracy validation and cross-validation. In cross-validation, however, the accuracy of the Gaussian variogram with a 7 m radius and 18 points is more accurate. In addition, this study demonstrates that Kriging is superior for extrapolating noise levels in undulating regions. Accurate visualising traffic noise levels requires a prior understanding of spatial interpolations.","PeriodicalId":502308,"journal":{"name":"Geodesy and cartography","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodesy and cartography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2024.18751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traffic noise mapping frequently employs Kriging, Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW), and Triangular Irregular Networks (TIN) spatial interpolations. This study uses the Henk de Kluijver noise model to evaluate the performance of spatial interpolations. Effective traffic noise mapping requires that noise observation points (Nops) be designed as 2 m grids. The upper and lower slopes function as noise barriers to reduce sound levels. Therefore, assessment of accuracy is essential for visualising noise levels in undulating and level terrain. In addition, this work gives an accurate comparison of traffic noise interpolation in undulating areas. The elements of spatial interpolations, such as the weighting factor, variogram, radius, and number of points influence the interpolation accuracy. The Kriging with a Gaussian variogram, where the radius is 5 m and the number of points is 12 demonstrates the highest level of precision. However, there is no direct relationship between accuracy validation and cross-validation. In cross-validation, however, the accuracy of the Gaussian variogram with a 7 m radius and 18 points is more accurate. In addition, this study demonstrates that Kriging is superior for extrapolating noise levels in undulating regions. Accurate visualising traffic noise levels requires a prior understanding of spatial interpolations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于绘制起伏和平坦地形交通噪声地图的空间插值法的性能评估
交通噪声绘图经常使用克里金法、反距离加权法(IDW)和三角不规则网络(TIN)空间插值法。本研究使用 Henk de Kluijver 噪声模型来评估空间插值的性能。有效的交通噪声绘图要求将噪声观测点(Nops)设计为 2 米网格。上坡和下坡起到隔音屏障的作用,以降低声级。因此,评估精确度对于可视化起伏和平坦地形的噪声级至关重要。此外,这项工作还对起伏区域的交通噪声插值进行了精确比较。加权因子、变异图、半径和点数等空间插值要素会影响插值精度。半径为 5 米、点数为 12 点的高斯变异图克里金插值精度最高。不过,精度验证和交叉验证之间没有直接关系。不过,在交叉验证中,半径为 7 米、点数为 18 点的高斯变分法的精度更高。此外,本研究还表明,克里金法在推断起伏区域的噪声水平方面更胜一筹。要准确直观地显示交通噪声水平,需要事先了解空间内插法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SUBSIDENCE ANALYSIS OF HYDROELECTRIC DAM USING THE KALMAN FILTER – A CASE STUDY IN HOA BINH HYDROPOWER PLANT, VIETNAM The country's oldest agricultural university, the State University of Land Management, is 245 years old Analyzing methods of obtaining and processing data for forming a real estate property master plan`s 3D model Assessing the open sand areas monthly dynamics in the east of the Stavropol Krai in 2023 Mapping the heterogeneity of population response in different countries to the spread of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1