Reliable Physics Demand Revision of the IPCC Global Warming Potentials

H. D. Lightfoot, Gerald Ratzer, Article Info
{"title":"Reliable Physics Demand Revision of the IPCC Global Warming Potentials","authors":"H. D. Lightfoot, Gerald Ratzer, Article Info","doi":"10.29169/1927-5129.2024.20.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Global Warming Potentials (GWP) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in Table 2.14 of the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) show the increase in warming by methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) is 21 and 310 times respectively that of CO2. There has been wide acceptance of these values since publishing in 2007. Nevertheless, they are inaccurate. This study uses accurate methods to calculate the impacts of CO2, CH4, and N2O on the warming of the atmosphere. For example, this quantitative analysis from reliable physics shows the contribution of CO2 to warming at Amsterdam is 0.0083oC out of a difference of 26oC. The warming effect of CH4 on the Earth’s atmosphere is 0.408% of that of CO2, and the warming by N2O is 0.085% of that of CO2. Thus, the warming effects of CO2, CH4, and N2O are too small to measure. The invalidity of the methane and nitrous oxide values indicates the GWPs of the remaining approximately sixty chemicals in the Table 2.14 list are also invalid. A recommendation is that the IPCC consider revising or retracting the GWP values in Table 2.14.","PeriodicalId":506710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences","volume":"241 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29169/1927-5129.2024.20.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Global Warming Potentials (GWP) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in Table 2.14 of the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) show the increase in warming by methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) is 21 and 310 times respectively that of CO2. There has been wide acceptance of these values since publishing in 2007. Nevertheless, they are inaccurate. This study uses accurate methods to calculate the impacts of CO2, CH4, and N2O on the warming of the atmosphere. For example, this quantitative analysis from reliable physics shows the contribution of CO2 to warming at Amsterdam is 0.0083oC out of a difference of 26oC. The warming effect of CH4 on the Earth’s atmosphere is 0.408% of that of CO2, and the warming by N2O is 0.085% of that of CO2. Thus, the warming effects of CO2, CH4, and N2O are too small to measure. The invalidity of the methane and nitrous oxide values indicates the GWPs of the remaining approximately sixty chemicals in the Table 2.14 list are also invalid. A recommendation is that the IPCC consider revising or retracting the GWP values in Table 2.14.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可靠的物理学要求修订 IPCC 全球变暖潜能值
政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告(AR4)表 2.14 中的全球升温潜能值(GWP)显示,甲烷(CH4)和氧化亚氮(N2O)的升温幅度分别是二氧化碳的 21 倍和 310 倍。自 2007 年发布以来,这些数值已被广泛接受。然而,这些数值并不准确。本研究采用精确的方法计算二氧化碳、甲烷和一氧化二氮对大气变暖的影响。例如,这项来自可靠物理学的定量分析显示,在 26oC 的温差中,二氧化碳对阿姆斯特丹变暖的影响为 0.0083oC。CH4 对地球大气变暖的影响是 CO2 的 0.408%,N2O 的变暖影响是 CO2 的 0.085%。因此,CO2、CH4 和 N2O 的增温效应太小,无法测量。甲烷和一氧化二氮数值的无效性表明,表 2.14 列出的其余约 60 种化学品的全球升温潜能值也是无效的。建议 IPCC 考虑修改或撤回表 2.14 中的全球升温潜能值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Magnetized, Chelated Iron Foliage Treatments, and Metal Halide Lamps on Plant Water Structure, Water Vapor Dynamics, and Resilience for Legumes under Water Stress Reliable Physics Demand Revision of the IPCC Global Warming Potentials Feasibility of Proppant Flowback Control by Use of Resin-coated Proppant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1