Investigating the Effects of Adhesive on the Shear Capacity of Bolted Steel Connections

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.14525/jjce.v18i2.06
Bilal Yasin
{"title":"Investigating the Effects of Adhesive on the Shear Capacity of Bolted Steel Connections","authors":"Bilal Yasin","doi":"10.14525/jjce.v18i2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, there has been a particular emphasis on the use of structural adhesives in steel connection systems. Applying adhesives that possess both high strength and flexibility would be highly advantageous for structural purposes. In this study, experimental tests are conducted on two main different types of steel-plate connections; namely, bolted connections and bolted connections with glue. The number of bolts ranged from one to eight for each connection type, such that a total of seven specimens of each type are tested. Additionally, one specimen with only glue is also tested for comparison. The findings indicated that the inclusion of up to four bolts with glue along the connection does not significantly increase the ultimate stress. This can be attributed to the non-uniform distribution of normal stresses, induced by the tightening of the small number of bolts that are not arranged across the entire connection region, on the capacity of the connection in the perpendicular direction. Thus, the connection could have been adequately established the same capacity through the use of adhesive alone. In contrast, the capacity is increased up to 60% and 100% when six or eight bolts are added, respectively, compared to the use of the connection with glue only. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis is developed based on the tested connections using ABAQUS/Explicit software. The glued interface between two steel plates is modelled using cohesive and damage criteria. The results are demonstrated to be consistent with the experimental findings. Keywords: ABAQUS, Adhesive, Bolts, Finite-element analysis, Shear, Steel connections","PeriodicalId":51814,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14525/jjce.v18i2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, there has been a particular emphasis on the use of structural adhesives in steel connection systems. Applying adhesives that possess both high strength and flexibility would be highly advantageous for structural purposes. In this study, experimental tests are conducted on two main different types of steel-plate connections; namely, bolted connections and bolted connections with glue. The number of bolts ranged from one to eight for each connection type, such that a total of seven specimens of each type are tested. Additionally, one specimen with only glue is also tested for comparison. The findings indicated that the inclusion of up to four bolts with glue along the connection does not significantly increase the ultimate stress. This can be attributed to the non-uniform distribution of normal stresses, induced by the tightening of the small number of bolts that are not arranged across the entire connection region, on the capacity of the connection in the perpendicular direction. Thus, the connection could have been adequately established the same capacity through the use of adhesive alone. In contrast, the capacity is increased up to 60% and 100% when six or eight bolts are added, respectively, compared to the use of the connection with glue only. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis is developed based on the tested connections using ABAQUS/Explicit software. The glued interface between two steel plates is modelled using cohesive and damage criteria. The results are demonstrated to be consistent with the experimental findings. Keywords: ABAQUS, Adhesive, Bolts, Finite-element analysis, Shear, Steel connections
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究粘合剂对螺栓连接钢筋剪切能力的影响
最近,人们特别强调在钢结构连接系统中使用结构粘合剂。在结构上使用同时具有高强度和柔韧性的粘合剂是非常有利的。本研究对两种不同类型的钢板连接进行了实验测试,即螺栓连接和带胶螺栓连接。每种连接类型的螺栓数量从一个到八个不等,因此每种类型共有七个试样接受测试。此外,还测试了一个仅使用胶水的试样,以进行比较。测试结果表明,在连接处加入最多四个螺栓和胶水并不会显著增加极限应力。这可以归因于法向应力的不均匀分布,这种不均匀分布是由于在整个连接区域内未布置的少量螺栓的拧紧对连接在垂直方向上的承载能力造成的。因此,仅使用粘合剂就能使连接达到相同的承载能力。相反,与仅使用胶水的连接方式相比,增加六个或八个螺栓后,连接能力分别提高了 60% 和 100%。根据测试的连接情况,使用 ABAQUS/Explicit 软件进行了三维有限元分析。两块钢板之间的胶合界面使用内聚和破坏标准进行建模。分析结果与实验结果一致。关键词ABAQUS、粘合剂、螺栓、有限元分析、剪切、钢连接
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: I am very pleased and honored to be appointed as an Editor-in-Chief of the Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering which enjoys an excellent reputation, both locally and internationally. Since development is the essence of life, I hope to continue developing this distinguished Journal, building on the effort of all the Editors-in-Chief and Editorial Board Members as well as Advisory Boards of the Journal since its establishment about a decade ago. I will do my best to focus on publishing high quality diverse articles and move forward in the indexing issue of the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Modeling of Risk Factors for Vulnerable Road Users’ Crashes on National Highways Passing through Medium-sized Indian Cities Investigating the Effects of Adhesive on the Shear Capacity of Bolted Steel Connections Spatiotemporal Analysis of Property Damage-only Accident Hotspots Using GIS in Sharjah, UAE Statistical Analysis of Operational Carbon for Different Building Types in the UAE Strategies for Enhancing Traffic Safety among Adolescent and Adult Motorcycle Riders in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1