EU resilience in investment protection: a case for revisiting and reinforcing the loyalty principle in EU external relations

Thomas Jaeger
{"title":"EU resilience in investment protection: a case for revisiting and reinforcing the loyalty principle in EU external relations","authors":"Thomas Jaeger","doi":"10.1093/yel/yeae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article explores the concept of European Union (EU) resilience in the area of investment protection and Investor–State dispute settlement. The article adopts a functional approach to investment protection and suggests that reforming dispute settlement procedures in line with current Commission initiatives is key to promoting open strategic autonomy for the EU. Support for those initiatives is however weak, also among EU Member States. It is argued that EU resilience requires new tools for more unity and coherence in external EU action, both generally and for the reform of Investor–State dispute settlement in particular. The tool devised here is an increased loyalty standard coupled with a justification test, based on both a modernized comprehensive reading of loyalty obligations in primary law and the effectiveness principle and rationale as applied in case law. The novel approach promises significantly better results in terms of commanding coherence in external action while fully respecting the principle of conferred powers. It challenges traditional power dynamics, but incorporates a bold vision for external EU action that is truly autonomous and assertive.","PeriodicalId":506840,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of European Law","volume":"67 S10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of European Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yeae001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the concept of European Union (EU) resilience in the area of investment protection and Investor–State dispute settlement. The article adopts a functional approach to investment protection and suggests that reforming dispute settlement procedures in line with current Commission initiatives is key to promoting open strategic autonomy for the EU. Support for those initiatives is however weak, also among EU Member States. It is argued that EU resilience requires new tools for more unity and coherence in external EU action, both generally and for the reform of Investor–State dispute settlement in particular. The tool devised here is an increased loyalty standard coupled with a justification test, based on both a modernized comprehensive reading of loyalty obligations in primary law and the effectiveness principle and rationale as applied in case law. The novel approach promises significantly better results in terms of commanding coherence in external action while fully respecting the principle of conferred powers. It challenges traditional power dynamics, but incorporates a bold vision for external EU action that is truly autonomous and assertive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟在投资保护方面的复原力:在欧盟对外关系中重新审视和加强忠诚原则的案例
本文探讨了欧洲联盟(欧盟)在投资保护和投资者与国家间争端解决领域的复原力概念。文章采用功能性方法处理投资保护问题,并认为根据欧盟委员会当前的倡议改革争端解决程序是促进欧盟开放战略自主权的关键。然而,欧盟成员国对这些倡议的支持力度较弱。本文认为,欧盟的复原力需要新的工具,以加强欧盟对外行动的统一性和协调性,这既包括总体行动,也包括投资者与国家间争端解决的改革。本文所设计的工具是一个更高的忠诚标准和一个正当性测试,其基础是对基本法中忠诚义务的现代化全面解读,以及判例法中适用的有效性原则和理由。这种新方法有望在充分尊重权力授予原则的同时,大大提高对外行动的一致性。它对传统的权力动态提出了挑战,但也为欧盟真正自主和自信的对外行动提出了大胆的设想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EU resilience in investment protection: a case for revisiting and reinforcing the loyalty principle in EU external relations NextGenerationEU: Hamiltonian moment or European New Deal? Introducing the legislative priority rule: a constitutional compass for the Court Global value chains in EU law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1