Patient Perspectives Following Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.

Alexandra C Nutaitis, Cecile A Ferrando, Katie Propst
{"title":"Patient Perspectives Following Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury.","authors":"Alexandra C Nutaitis, Cecile A Ferrando, Katie Propst","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\nAn obstetric anal sphincter injury can significantly affect patients. Support for these patients is both limited and not well understood.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe aim of this study was to describe patient experiences after an obstetric anal sphincter injury.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nThis is a prospective cross-sectional qualitative study of patients who experienced an obstetric anal sphincter injury within a tertiary care network between May and June of 2022. Demographic data, clinical data regarding the delivery, and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale were collected. Prospective semistructured interviews were conducted approximately 5-12 weeks postpartum to address opportunities to improve obstetric anal sphincter injury care. Qualitative analysis was performed using a grounded theory approach.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFifteen women with a mean age of 31 (±3.93) years participated. The majority identified as White (93.3%) and non-Hispanic (100%). All participants identified as being married to men and completing undergraduate education; 9 (60%) also received postgraduate education. Five participants (33.3%) screened positive (score of 10 or greater) for postnatal depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Thematic saturation was reached with 3 major themes identified: (1) pain control, (2) desire for multifactorial support, and (3) obstetric anal sphincter injury knowledge and awareness.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nExperiencing an obstetric anal sphincter injury represents a great unknown to most women. This study identifies opportunities for improved postpartum care through education, pain control, and patient support. Interventions are needed to improve the postpartum experience for women who experience an obstetric anal sphincter injury with childbirth.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IMPORTANCE An obstetric anal sphincter injury can significantly affect patients. Support for these patients is both limited and not well understood. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences after an obstetric anal sphincter injury. STUDY DESIGN This is a prospective cross-sectional qualitative study of patients who experienced an obstetric anal sphincter injury within a tertiary care network between May and June of 2022. Demographic data, clinical data regarding the delivery, and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale were collected. Prospective semistructured interviews were conducted approximately 5-12 weeks postpartum to address opportunities to improve obstetric anal sphincter injury care. Qualitative analysis was performed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS Fifteen women with a mean age of 31 (±3.93) years participated. The majority identified as White (93.3%) and non-Hispanic (100%). All participants identified as being married to men and completing undergraduate education; 9 (60%) also received postgraduate education. Five participants (33.3%) screened positive (score of 10 or greater) for postnatal depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Thematic saturation was reached with 3 major themes identified: (1) pain control, (2) desire for multifactorial support, and (3) obstetric anal sphincter injury knowledge and awareness. CONCLUSIONS Experiencing an obstetric anal sphincter injury represents a great unknown to most women. This study identifies opportunities for improved postpartum care through education, pain control, and patient support. Interventions are needed to improve the postpartum experience for women who experience an obstetric anal sphincter injury with childbirth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科肛门括约肌损伤后患者的观点。
重要性产科肛门括约肌损伤会对患者造成严重影响。本研究旨在描述产科肛门括约肌损伤后患者的经历。研究设计这是一项前瞻性横断面定性研究,研究对象是 2022 年 5 月至 6 月间在一家三级医疗网络内经历过产科肛门括约肌损伤的患者。研究收集了人口统计学数据、分娩临床数据和爱丁堡产后抑郁量表。在产后约 5-12 周进行了前瞻性半结构式访谈,以探讨改善产科肛门括约肌损伤护理的机会。结果15名平均年龄为31(±3.93)岁的产妇参加了访谈。大多数参与者为白人(93.3%)和非西班牙裔(100%)。所有参与者均已婚并完成了本科教育;其中 9 人(60%)还接受了研究生教育。有 5 名参与者(33.3%)在爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale)中筛查出产后抑郁阳性(10 分或以上)。主题饱和度达到了 3 个主要的主题:(结论对于大多数产妇来说,产科肛门括约肌损伤是一个巨大的未知数。本研究发现了通过教育、疼痛控制和患者支持来改善产后护理的机会。需要采取干预措施来改善产科肛门括约肌损伤产妇的产后体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Staged Versus Concomitant Stress Incontinence Procedures With Prolapse Repairs The Effect of a Physician Consultation on Patient Reported Outcomes in Urogynecology 16th EUGA Annual Congress 19-21 October 2023, Varese – Palais des Congrès Laser and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Access to Urogynecologic Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mystery Caller Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1