Prevalence of Sexual Function and Vibrator Use Among Urogynecology Patients.

Brittany Roberts, Rebecca G. Rogers, Katherine Husk, Jessmehar Walia, Bradley Jacobs, Gillian Wolff, Erin C. Deverdis
{"title":"Prevalence of Sexual Function and Vibrator Use Among Urogynecology Patients.","authors":"Brittany Roberts, Rebecca G. Rogers, Katherine Husk, Jessmehar Walia, Bradley Jacobs, Gillian Wolff, Erin C. Deverdis","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IMPORTANCE\nUrogynecology patients often present with sexual dysfunction; limited information on vibrator utilization to improve sexual function in this population exists.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe aim of this study was to assess patient knowledge of and receptivity to vibrator use.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nWe conducted a cross-sectional, survey-based cohort study. The survey included patient characteristics, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire Short Form 12, and vibrator use questions. Our primary outcome was vibrator utilization rates comparing younger (<65) and older (≥65 years) urogynecology patients.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf 213 distributed, 165 (78%) surveys were analyzed. Of these, 104 participants (63%) were aged <65 years and 61 (37%) were ≥65 years. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (all P's > 0.05). Older patients reported less vibrator utilization than younger patients (30% vs 64%, P ≤ 0.001) and were less likely to be sexually active with a partner (36% vs 62%, P = 0.002) or masturbate (23% vs 51%, P ≤ 0.001). Most patients (76%) thought physicians should discuss vibrators with patients who would like to improve their sexual function with no differences between age groups (71% vs 80%, P = 0.17). Among women receptive to vibrator use, in a multivariable analysis, patients who reported masturbation (odds ratio [OR], 13.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.80-67.71), vibrator use in the past (OR, 24.4; 95% CI, 6.65-89.53), or who believed physicians should discuss vibrators in a clinical setting (OR, 11.66; 95% CI, 2.9-46.81) were more receptive to vibrator use to improve sexual function. Age did not influence receptivity.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nVibrator utilization is greater among younger than older patients. Most urogynecologic patients think health care providers should discuss vibrator use with patients who wish to improve sexual function.","PeriodicalId":517282,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Urogynecology patients often present with sexual dysfunction; limited information on vibrator utilization to improve sexual function in this population exists. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess patient knowledge of and receptivity to vibrator use. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a cross-sectional, survey-based cohort study. The survey included patient characteristics, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire Short Form 12, and vibrator use questions. Our primary outcome was vibrator utilization rates comparing younger (<65) and older (≥65 years) urogynecology patients. RESULTS Of 213 distributed, 165 (78%) surveys were analyzed. Of these, 104 participants (63%) were aged <65 years and 61 (37%) were ≥65 years. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (all P's > 0.05). Older patients reported less vibrator utilization than younger patients (30% vs 64%, P ≤ 0.001) and were less likely to be sexually active with a partner (36% vs 62%, P = 0.002) or masturbate (23% vs 51%, P ≤ 0.001). Most patients (76%) thought physicians should discuss vibrators with patients who would like to improve their sexual function with no differences between age groups (71% vs 80%, P = 0.17). Among women receptive to vibrator use, in a multivariable analysis, patients who reported masturbation (odds ratio [OR], 13.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.80-67.71), vibrator use in the past (OR, 24.4; 95% CI, 6.65-89.53), or who believed physicians should discuss vibrators in a clinical setting (OR, 11.66; 95% CI, 2.9-46.81) were more receptive to vibrator use to improve sexual function. Age did not influence receptivity. CONCLUSIONS Vibrator utilization is greater among younger than older patients. Most urogynecologic patients think health care providers should discuss vibrator use with patients who wish to improve sexual function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泌尿妇科患者中性功能和振动器使用的普遍性。
重要性妇产科患者经常出现性功能障碍;有关使用振动器改善该人群性功能的信息有限。目的本研究旨在评估患者对振动器使用的了解和接受程度。调查内容包括患者特征、盆底压力量表-20 (PFDI-20)、盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性问卷简表 12 和振动器使用问题。我们的主要结果是振动器使用率与年轻患者的比较 ( 0.05)。老年患者对振动器的使用率低于年轻患者(30% 对 64%,P ≤ 0.001),与性伴侣的性活跃度(36% 对 62%,P = 0.002)或自慰的可能性也低于年轻患者(23% 对 51%,P ≤ 0.001)。大多数患者(76%)认为医生应该与希望改善性功能的患者讨论振动器问题,不同年龄组之间没有差异(71% vs 80%,P = 0.17)。在接受使用振动器的女性中,在一项多变量分析中,报告有手淫(几率比 [OR],13.8;95% 置信区间 [CI],2.80-67.71)、过去使用过振动器(OR,24.4;95% CI,6.65-89.53)或认为医生应在临床环境中讨论振动器(OR,11.66;95% CI,2.9-46.81)的患者更容易接受使用振动器来改善性功能。结论年轻患者比年长患者更乐于使用振动器。大多数泌尿妇科患者认为医疗服务提供者应与希望改善性功能的患者讨论振动器的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Staged Versus Concomitant Stress Incontinence Procedures With Prolapse Repairs The Effect of a Physician Consultation on Patient Reported Outcomes in Urogynecology 16th EUGA Annual Congress 19-21 October 2023, Varese – Palais des Congrès Laser and Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Access to Urogynecologic Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Mystery Caller Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1