Aerobic Endurance - Finding Optimal Rowing Ergometer Settings to Match Physiological Demands of Running

Q4 Social Sciences Studia Sportiva Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.5817/sts2024-1-6
Petr Kellner, Michal Polách, Jiří Sekanina, Jiří Zháněl
{"title":"Aerobic Endurance - Finding Optimal Rowing Ergometer Settings to Match Physiological Demands of Running","authors":"Petr Kellner, Michal Polách, Jiří Sekanina, Jiří Zháněl","doi":"10.5817/sts2024-1-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing aerobic endurance is crucial for evaluating fitness levels, with the Cooper 12-minute test widely recognized as a benchmark. However, indoor rowing on the Concept2 rowing ergometer lacks a standardized equivalent, prompting this study to explore the potential of a 12-minute rowing test as an alternative. Despite differences in muscle groups, rowing shares foundational aerobic capacities with running. The investigation centers around the rowing drag factor, hypothesizing its role in aligning rowing performance with the physiological demands of running. The study involved 56 healthy male soldiers (age: 22.89 ± 2.28 years) undergoing 12-minute running and three drag factor rowing tests. While basic anthropometrics showed limited influence, height correlated positively with rowing performances, and weight negatively affected both running and rowing at low resistance and positively at higher resistances. The closest correlation between running and various drag factor rowing tests, and also the only one with no statistically significant difference in distance covered, was found at damper setting 1 of the ergometer, representing the lowest drag factor. The relatively low coefficient of determination (r2 = 0,18) suggests diversity in the performance foundations of the 12-minute running and rowing. Therefore, further analysis is needed before the rowing test can be considered a valid alternative to the Cooper test.","PeriodicalId":36179,"journal":{"name":"Studia Sportiva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Sportiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/sts2024-1-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing aerobic endurance is crucial for evaluating fitness levels, with the Cooper 12-minute test widely recognized as a benchmark. However, indoor rowing on the Concept2 rowing ergometer lacks a standardized equivalent, prompting this study to explore the potential of a 12-minute rowing test as an alternative. Despite differences in muscle groups, rowing shares foundational aerobic capacities with running. The investigation centers around the rowing drag factor, hypothesizing its role in aligning rowing performance with the physiological demands of running. The study involved 56 healthy male soldiers (age: 22.89 ± 2.28 years) undergoing 12-minute running and three drag factor rowing tests. While basic anthropometrics showed limited influence, height correlated positively with rowing performances, and weight negatively affected both running and rowing at low resistance and positively at higher resistances. The closest correlation between running and various drag factor rowing tests, and also the only one with no statistically significant difference in distance covered, was found at damper setting 1 of the ergometer, representing the lowest drag factor. The relatively low coefficient of determination (r2 = 0,18) suggests diversity in the performance foundations of the 12-minute running and rowing. Therefore, further analysis is needed before the rowing test can be considered a valid alternative to the Cooper test.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有氧耐力--找到赛艇测力计的最佳设置,以满足跑步的生理需求
评估有氧耐力对于评价体能水平至关重要,库珀 12 分钟测试被公认为是一个基准。然而,Concept2 划船测力计上的室内划船缺乏标准化的等效测试,这促使本研究探索 12 分钟划船测试作为替代方法的潜力。尽管肌肉群不同,但划船与跑步具有相同的基础有氧能力。调查围绕划船阻力因素展开,假设其在使划船成绩与跑步的生理需求相一致方面所起的作用。研究涉及 56 名健康男性士兵(年龄:22.89 ± 2.28 岁),他们接受了 12 分钟跑步和三次阻力因素划船测试。虽然基本人体测量学显示影响有限,但身高与划船成绩呈正相关,体重在低阻力时对跑步和划船产生负面影响,而在高阻力时则产生正面影响。在阻力系数最低的测力计上,阻力系数设置为 1 时,跑步和各种阻力系数划船测试之间的相关性最接近,也是唯一在距离上没有显著统计学差异的测试。相对较低的决定系数(r2 = 0.18)表明,12 分钟跑步和划船的性能基础具有多样性。因此,在将划船测试视为库珀测试的有效替代品之前,还需要进行进一步的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Sportiva
Studia Sportiva Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Regional Disparities Among Teams in Selected Countries with a Focus on Age Variations Examining Diversity and Team Satisfaction: A Quantitative Analysis in Czech Urban and Rural Contexts Kiteboarding Injuries Aerobic Endurance - Finding Optimal Rowing Ergometer Settings to Match Physiological Demands of Running Analysis of University Students' Perspectives on Physical Activity and Mandatory Physical Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1