Design and Modification of COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Interview Scripts Used by Health Departments Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Cara Orfield, Penny S. Loosier, Sarah Wagner, E. R. Sabin, Michelle Fiscus, Holly Matulewicz, Divya Vohra, Colleen Staatz, Melanie M Taylor, Elise C Caruso, Nick DeLuca, P. Moonan, J. Oeltmann, Phoebe Thorpe
{"title":"Design and Modification of COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Interview Scripts Used by Health Departments Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Cara Orfield, Penny S. Loosier, Sarah Wagner, E. R. Sabin, Michelle Fiscus, Holly Matulewicz, Divya Vohra, Colleen Staatz, Melanie M Taylor, Elise C Caruso, Nick DeLuca, P. Moonan, J. Oeltmann, Phoebe Thorpe","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nWe sought to (1) document how health departments (HDs) developed COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing (CI/CT) interview scripts and the topics covered, and (2) understand how and why HDs modified those scripts.\n\n\nDESIGN\nQualitative analysis of CI/CT interview scripts and in-depth key informant interviews with public health officials in 14 HDs. Collected scripts represent 3 distinct points (initial, the majority of which were time stamped May 2020; interim, spanning from September 2020 to August 2021; and current, as of April 2022).\n\n\nSETTING\nFourteen state, local, and tribal health jurisdictions and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS\nThirty-six public health officials involved in leading CI/CT from 14 state, local, and tribal health jurisdictions (6 states, 3 cities, 4 counties, and 1 tribal area).\n\n\nMAIN OUTCOME MEASURE\nInterview script elements included in CI/CT interview scripts over time.\n\n\nRESULTS\nMany COVID-19 CI/CT scripts were developed by modifying questions from scripts used for other communicable diseases. Early in the pandemic, scripts included guidance on isolation/quarantine and discussed symptoms of COVID-19. As the pandemic evolved, the length of scripts increased substantially, with significant additions on contact elicitation, vaccinations, isolation/quarantine recommendations, and testing. Drivers of script changes included changes in our understanding of how the virus spreads, risk factors and symptoms, new treatments, new variants, vaccine development, and adjustments to CDC's official isolation and quarantine guidance.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur findings offer suggestions about components to include in future CI/CT efforts, including educating members of the public about the disease and its symptoms, offering mitigation guidance, and providing sufficient support and resources to help people act on that guidance. Assessing the correlation between script length and number of completed interviews or other quality and performance measures could be an area for future study.","PeriodicalId":296123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","volume":"300 1","pages":"336-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES We sought to (1) document how health departments (HDs) developed COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing (CI/CT) interview scripts and the topics covered, and (2) understand how and why HDs modified those scripts. DESIGN Qualitative analysis of CI/CT interview scripts and in-depth key informant interviews with public health officials in 14 HDs. Collected scripts represent 3 distinct points (initial, the majority of which were time stamped May 2020; interim, spanning from September 2020 to August 2021; and current, as of April 2022). SETTING Fourteen state, local, and tribal health jurisdictions and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PARTICIPANTS Thirty-six public health officials involved in leading CI/CT from 14 state, local, and tribal health jurisdictions (6 states, 3 cities, 4 counties, and 1 tribal area). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Interview script elements included in CI/CT interview scripts over time. RESULTS Many COVID-19 CI/CT scripts were developed by modifying questions from scripts used for other communicable diseases. Early in the pandemic, scripts included guidance on isolation/quarantine and discussed symptoms of COVID-19. As the pandemic evolved, the length of scripts increased substantially, with significant additions on contact elicitation, vaccinations, isolation/quarantine recommendations, and testing. Drivers of script changes included changes in our understanding of how the virus spreads, risk factors and symptoms, new treatments, new variants, vaccine development, and adjustments to CDC's official isolation and quarantine guidance. CONCLUSIONS Our findings offer suggestions about components to include in future CI/CT efforts, including educating members of the public about the disease and its symptoms, offering mitigation guidance, and providing sufficient support and resources to help people act on that guidance. Assessing the correlation between script length and number of completed interviews or other quality and performance measures could be an area for future study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生部门在整个 COVID-19 大流行期间使用的 COVID-19 病例调查和接触者追踪访谈脚本的设计和修改。
我们试图:(1)记录卫生部门(HDs)如何制定 COVID-19 病例调查和接触者追踪(CI/CT)访谈脚本以及所涵盖的主题;(2)了解卫生部门如何以及为何修改这些脚本。设计对 CI/CT 访谈脚本进行定性分析,并对 14 个卫生部门的公共卫生官员进行深入的关键信息提供者访谈。收集到的脚本代表了 3 个不同的时间点(初始时间,其中大部分的时间戳为 2020 年 5 月;中期时间,跨度为 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 8 月;当前时间,截至 2022 年 4 月)。参与者来自 14 个州、地方和部落卫生辖区(6 个州、3 个市、4 个县和 1 个部落地区)的 36 名参与领导 CI/CT 的公共卫生官员。主要结果测量随着时间的推移,CI/CT 访谈脚本中包含的访谈脚本要素。在大流行早期,脚本包括隔离/检疫指导,并讨论了 COVID-19 的症状。随着大流行的发展,脚本的长度大幅增加,其中大量增加了关于接触诱导、疫苗接种、隔离/检疫建议和检测的内容。脚本变化的驱动因素包括我们对病毒传播方式、风险因素和症状、新疗法、新变种、疫苗开发以及疾病预防控制中心官方隔离和检疫指南调整的理解发生了变化。评估脚本长度与完成访谈次数或其他质量和绩效衡量标准之间的相关性可能是未来研究的一个领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Northern Nevada Public Health: Utilizing the Public Health Workforce Calculator and Workforce Capacity Self-assessment Tools to Develop a Framework for Workforce Investment. Few Prison Systems Release Individual Death Data: Death in Custody Reporting Act Completeness, Speed, and Compliance. Faces of Local Public Health: Insights Across LHD Staff Data on Race, Ethnicity, and Gender From the 2022 National Profile of Local Health Departments. Commentary on Schneider et al., "Charting the Advocacy Landscape: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Syllabi in Public Health Graduate Education". Legislative Health Notes: Preliminary Learnings From Piloting a New Policy Analysis Tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1