Role of L-, N- and T-type Calcium Channels in Achieving Maximum Analgesic and Minimum Toxic Effect of Tramadol

M. Yilmaz, B. Suleyman, R. Mammadov, D. Altuner, T. Coban, S. Bulut, H. Suleyman, Resid Coskun
{"title":"Role of L-, N- and T-type Calcium Channels in Achieving Maximum Analgesic and Minimum Toxic Effect of Tramadol","authors":"M. Yilmaz, B. Suleyman, R. Mammadov, D. Altuner, T. Coban, S. Bulut, H. Suleyman, Resid Coskun","doi":"10.32383/appdr/179230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of lacidipine, amlodipine and benidipine on the analgesic activity and toxicity of tramadol. Rats (n=6/each group) were divided into five groups as control(CG), tramadol(TRD), lacidipine+tramadol(LTRD), amlodipine+tramadol(ATRD) and benidipine+tramadol(BTRD). Tramadol was administered once at a dose of 50 mg/kg and lacidipine, amlodipin, benidipin were administered at a dose of 4 mg/kg orally, once a day for 10 days. After the animals were sacrificed malondialdehyde(MDA) and total glutathione(tGSH) levels were measured in brain, heart, liver and kidney tissues. Troponin I(Tp I), alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), blood urea nitrogen(BUN), and creatinine levels were determined in serum. Paw pain thresholds were measured 1 hour before and after drug administration. Analgesic effect of tramadol was increased the most by benidipine, while amlodipine and lacidipine increased it equally. Lacidipine failed to suppress MDA increase and tGSH decrease in brain tissue. Benidipine suppressed MDA increase and tGSH decrease in brain tissue better than amlodipine. All three drugs suppressed cardiac tissue oxidative stress and the release of TP I into the circulation. Lacidipine and amlodipine could not prevent tramadol-induced oxidative stress in liver and kidney tissues, whereas benidipine prevented excessive MDA increase and tGSH decrease. Benidipine significantly suppressed the increase of ALT, AST, BUN, and creatinine. Analgesic activity was 35.1% in TRD, 43.7% in LTRD 50.4% in ATRD and 67,5% in BTRD. Study results show that benidipine and tramadol co-treatment is better than co-treatment with lacidipine or amlodipine in achieving minimal toxic effects and maximum analgesia.","PeriodicalId":7135,"journal":{"name":"Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica - Drug Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica - Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32383/appdr/179230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of lacidipine, amlodipine and benidipine on the analgesic activity and toxicity of tramadol. Rats (n=6/each group) were divided into five groups as control(CG), tramadol(TRD), lacidipine+tramadol(LTRD), amlodipine+tramadol(ATRD) and benidipine+tramadol(BTRD). Tramadol was administered once at a dose of 50 mg/kg and lacidipine, amlodipin, benidipin were administered at a dose of 4 mg/kg orally, once a day for 10 days. After the animals were sacrificed malondialdehyde(MDA) and total glutathione(tGSH) levels were measured in brain, heart, liver and kidney tissues. Troponin I(Tp I), alanine aminotransferase(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase(AST), blood urea nitrogen(BUN), and creatinine levels were determined in serum. Paw pain thresholds were measured 1 hour before and after drug administration. Analgesic effect of tramadol was increased the most by benidipine, while amlodipine and lacidipine increased it equally. Lacidipine failed to suppress MDA increase and tGSH decrease in brain tissue. Benidipine suppressed MDA increase and tGSH decrease in brain tissue better than amlodipine. All three drugs suppressed cardiac tissue oxidative stress and the release of TP I into the circulation. Lacidipine and amlodipine could not prevent tramadol-induced oxidative stress in liver and kidney tissues, whereas benidipine prevented excessive MDA increase and tGSH decrease. Benidipine significantly suppressed the increase of ALT, AST, BUN, and creatinine. Analgesic activity was 35.1% in TRD, 43.7% in LTRD 50.4% in ATRD and 67,5% in BTRD. Study results show that benidipine and tramadol co-treatment is better than co-treatment with lacidipine or amlodipine in achieving minimal toxic effects and maximum analgesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
L、N 和 T 型钙通道在实现曲马多最大镇痛作用和最小毒性作用中的作用
该研究旨在探讨拉西地平、氨氯地平和贝尼地平对曲马多镇痛活性和毒性的影响。将大鼠(n=6/每组)分为对照组(CG)、曲马多组(TRD)、拉西地平+曲马多组(LTRD)、氨氯地平+曲马多组(ATRD)和贝尼地平+曲马多组(BTRD)五组。曲马多的剂量为 50 毫克/千克,拉西地平、氨氯地平和贝尼地平的剂量为 4 毫克/千克,每天口服一次,连续 10 天。动物被处死后,测量脑、心、肝和肾组织中丙二醛(MDA)和总谷胱甘肽(tGSH)的水平。测定血清中肌钙蛋白 I(Tp I)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、血尿素氮(BUN)和肌酐水平。用药前后 1 小时测量爪痛阈值。贝尼地平对曲马多镇痛作用的增加最大,而氨氯地平和拉西地平对其镇痛作用的增加相同。拉西地平未能抑制脑组织中 MDA 的增加和 tGSH 的减少。与氨氯地平相比,贝尼地平能更好地抑制脑组织中 MDA 的增加和 tGSH 的减少。这三种药物都能抑制心脏组织的氧化应激和 TP I 在血液循环中的释放。拉西地平和氨氯地平不能阻止曲马多诱导的肝脏和肾脏组织氧化应激,而贝尼地平能阻止过量的 MDA 增加和 tGSH 减少。贝尼地平能明显抑制谷丙转氨酶(ALT)、谷草转氨酶(AST)、尿素氮(BUN)和肌酐(Creatinine)的升高。镇痛活性在 TRD 中为 35.1%,在 LTRD 中为 43.7%,在 ATRD 中为 50.4%,在 BTRD 中为 67.5%。研究结果表明,贝尼地平与曲马多联合治疗比与拉西地平或氨氯地平联合治疗更能达到最小的毒性反应和最大的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of L-, N- and T-type Calcium Channels in Achieving Maximum Analgesic and Minimum Toxic Effect of Tramadol Validation of Novel High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for Meropenem Quantification in Plasma Development of Method for Determining Topiramate in Various Biological Matrices (Plasma, Saliva, Hair) and Its Application in Clinical Practice Research Progress in the Relationship Between P2X7 and Flavonoids in Cardiovascular Disease Are Polish Hospital Pharmacies Ready for Changes in Drug Distribution?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1