Combining Embryo Transfer and Artificial Insemination to Achieve Twinning in Beef Cattle, and Effects of Different Twin Calf-Raising Methods on Neonatal Behavior and Growth

Ruminants Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.3390/ruminants4020014
E. M. Bortoluzzi, K. Aubuchon, Nicole D. Robben, Nicole Stafford, M. J. Goering, Claiborn Bronkhorst, J. A. Odde, Clay Breiner, Karol Fike, Lindsey E. Hulbert, Kenneth G. Odde
{"title":"Combining Embryo Transfer and Artificial Insemination to Achieve Twinning in Beef Cattle, and Effects of Different Twin Calf-Raising Methods on Neonatal Behavior and Growth","authors":"E. M. Bortoluzzi, K. Aubuchon, Nicole D. Robben, Nicole Stafford, M. J. Goering, Claiborn Bronkhorst, J. A. Odde, Clay Breiner, Karol Fike, Lindsey E. Hulbert, Kenneth G. Odde","doi":"10.3390/ruminants4020014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the beef industry moves towards efficient animal production to improve sustainability in agriculture, new production and management approaches are emerging. Among the many facets of the beef industry, cow–calf operations have the most opportunity for efficiency improvement, including improvements in fertility. This project accounts for measures and methods of (1) twinning reproductive technologies and (2) twin calf perinatal care and pre-weaning rearing. The overall objective was to produce twin calves using two reproductive technologies—embryo transfer and artificial insemination. The subobjectives were to determine accuracy of twin pregnancies embryo/fetal losses using ultrasonography, evaluate parturition and dystocia, and determine the effects of different twin-raising methods on neonatal behavior and growth. A fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocol was applied to 77 multiparous Angus-cross cows from a commercial beef herd in northcentral South Dakota during the summer of 2019. Cows were assigned to two different treatments groups: only artificially inseminated (AI) or received an embryo transfer following artificial insemination (ET + AI). They were estrous-synchronized, artificially inseminated (AI) with black Angus semen at day 0, and received and embryo transfer (ET) at day 7. Ultrasound examination detected 56% pregnancy risk for both groups, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 75%, 100%, and 90.5%, respectively, for bilateral twin detection. Calves were born during spring 2020. Twin calves (n = 34) and singleton calves (n = 11) were assigned to one of three raising methods: (1) twin born and twin raised (TT; n = 16), (2) twin born and single raised (TS; n = 18), and (3) single born and single raised (S; n = 11). Neonatal nursing behavior and birth weights were recorded, and adjusted day 200 and day 280 were calculated measures of vitality and growth. Blood samples were collected at age 24 h for colostrum intake measures (total serum protein, IgG1, and IgM). Twin calves were born 20% (p < 0.05) lighter in body weight than singletons; however, weights did not differ at day 280 between TT and S calves. TS calves had the shortest average latency to stand, but immunoglobulin concentrations did not differ among treatments. At weaning, cows that had birthed and raised twins produced more kilograms of live weight per pregnancy than cows birthing and raising singletons. Using ET + AI proved to increase twinning rate, and growth was maintained when raising both twins with their dam.","PeriodicalId":508508,"journal":{"name":"Ruminants","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ruminants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants4020014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the beef industry moves towards efficient animal production to improve sustainability in agriculture, new production and management approaches are emerging. Among the many facets of the beef industry, cow–calf operations have the most opportunity for efficiency improvement, including improvements in fertility. This project accounts for measures and methods of (1) twinning reproductive technologies and (2) twin calf perinatal care and pre-weaning rearing. The overall objective was to produce twin calves using two reproductive technologies—embryo transfer and artificial insemination. The subobjectives were to determine accuracy of twin pregnancies embryo/fetal losses using ultrasonography, evaluate parturition and dystocia, and determine the effects of different twin-raising methods on neonatal behavior and growth. A fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocol was applied to 77 multiparous Angus-cross cows from a commercial beef herd in northcentral South Dakota during the summer of 2019. Cows were assigned to two different treatments groups: only artificially inseminated (AI) or received an embryo transfer following artificial insemination (ET + AI). They were estrous-synchronized, artificially inseminated (AI) with black Angus semen at day 0, and received and embryo transfer (ET) at day 7. Ultrasound examination detected 56% pregnancy risk for both groups, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 75%, 100%, and 90.5%, respectively, for bilateral twin detection. Calves were born during spring 2020. Twin calves (n = 34) and singleton calves (n = 11) were assigned to one of three raising methods: (1) twin born and twin raised (TT; n = 16), (2) twin born and single raised (TS; n = 18), and (3) single born and single raised (S; n = 11). Neonatal nursing behavior and birth weights were recorded, and adjusted day 200 and day 280 were calculated measures of vitality and growth. Blood samples were collected at age 24 h for colostrum intake measures (total serum protein, IgG1, and IgM). Twin calves were born 20% (p < 0.05) lighter in body weight than singletons; however, weights did not differ at day 280 between TT and S calves. TS calves had the shortest average latency to stand, but immunoglobulin concentrations did not differ among treatments. At weaning, cows that had birthed and raised twins produced more kilograms of live weight per pregnancy than cows birthing and raising singletons. Using ET + AI proved to increase twinning rate, and growth was maintained when raising both twins with their dam.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合胚胎移植和人工授精实现肉牛双胞胎,以及不同双胞胎犊牛饲养方法对新生儿行为和生长的影响
随着牛肉业朝着高效畜牧生产的方向发展,以提高农业的可持续性,新的生产和管理方法不断涌现。在牛肉产业的诸多方面中,牛犊饲养最有机会提高效率,包括提高繁殖力。该项目包括以下措施和方法:(1) 双胎繁殖技术;(2) 双胎犊牛围产期护理和断奶前饲养。总体目标是利用胚胎移植和人工授精这两种繁殖技术生产双胞胎犊牛。子目标是利用超声波检查确定双胎妊娠胚胎/胎儿损失的准确性,评估分娩和难产情况,并确定不同的双胎饲养方法对新生儿行为和生长的影响。2019年夏季,南达科他州中北部一个商业化肉牛群的77头多胎安格斯杂交奶牛采用了固定时间人工授精(FTAI)方案。奶牛被分配到两个不同的处理组:只进行人工授精(AI)或在人工授精后进行胚胎移植(ET + AI)。它们进行发情同步,在第0天使用黑安格斯精液进行人工授精(AI),并在第7天接受胚胎移植(ET)。超声波检查发现两组妊娠风险均为 56%,双侧双胞胎检测的灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为 75%、100% 和 90.5%。小牛于 2020 年春季出生。双胞胎犊牛(n = 34)和单胎犊牛(n = 11)被分配到三种饲养方法中的一种:(1) 双生双养(TT;n = 16);(2) 双生单养(TS;n = 18);(3) 单生单养(S;n = 11)。记录新生儿的哺乳行为和出生体重,并计算调整后的第 200 天和第 280 天的活力和生长情况。在犊牛出生后 24 小时采集血液样本,用于测量初乳摄入量(血清总蛋白、IgG1 和 IgM)。双胞胎犊牛出生时的体重比单胎犊牛轻 20% (p < 0.05);但是,TT 和 S 型犊牛在出生后第 280 天的体重没有差异。TS犊牛的平均站立潜伏期最短,但不同处理间的免疫球蛋白浓度并无差异。断奶时,分娩和哺育双胞胎的奶牛比分娩和哺育单胎的奶牛每胎生产的活重更多。事实证明,使用ET+人工授精可提高双胞胎率,而且与母牛一起饲养双胞胎时,可保持生长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metabolomic Profiling, Volatile Fatty Acids, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Beef Cattle Infused with Different Essential Oil Blends The Effects of Breed, Lactation Number, and Lameness on the Behavior, Production, and Reproduction of Lactating Dairy Cows in Central Texas Evaluating the Bias of Two Point-of-Care Glucometers for Calves and Ewes: Awareness for Ruminant Practitioners A Novel Direct-Fed Microbial Impacts Growth Performance and Supports Overall Health of Feedlot Cattle Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Litter Size and Growth Traits in a Prolific Line of Tunisian Barbarine Sheep
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1