A Novel Direct-Fed Microbial Impacts Growth Performance and Supports Overall Health of Feedlot Cattle

Ruminants Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.3390/ruminants4020019
Octavio Guimaraes, Garrett Preedy, J. T. Fox, B. Cappellozza, Ty C. Davis, Jennifer S. Schutz, M. Theurer
{"title":"A Novel Direct-Fed Microbial Impacts Growth Performance and Supports Overall Health of Feedlot Cattle","authors":"Octavio Guimaraes, Garrett Preedy, J. T. Fox, B. Cappellozza, Ty C. Davis, Jennifer S. Schutz, M. Theurer","doi":"10.3390/ruminants4020019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-hormone-treated beef steers (n = 1625; 371 ± 8.4 kg) were used to determine the impact of a direct-fed microbial (DFM) on growth performance, carcass characteristics, health parameters, and economic outcomes in finishing beef cattle. Steers were blocked based on initial BW, sorted into three optimal marketing groups for each day of enrollment, randomly assigned to one of two treatments (12 replicates per treatment), and fed for an average of 133 days before harvest. Treatments included the following: (1) control (CON) and (2) 50 mg/head per day of a DFM (BDP) containing Lactobacillus animalis 506, Propionibacterium freudenreichii 507, Bacillus licheniformis 809, and Bacillus subtilis 597 (BOVAMINE DEFEND® Plus). Steers were weighed in drafts by pen on a certified scale at closeout, and both pens within a block were harvested on the same day. Carcass characteristics and liver scores were collected upon slaughter. Data were analyzed as part of a completely randomized block design with the pen as the experimental unit. There was no difference in dry matter intake and final body weight between treatments. The BDP steers exhibited a lower number of total outs (deads and removed) throughout the experiment (p < 0.01). Average daily gain (ADG) tended to be greater (p < 0.06), and feed efficiency (p < 0.01) was greater, for steers receiving BDP. Although there were no statistical differences in hot carcass weight and quality grade between treatments, there was a lower incidence of liver abscess scores (p < 0.01) in the BDP steers. These data suggest that BOVAMINE DEFEND® Plus supplementation improves growth performance during the finishing phase, reduces overall mortality, and improves feed to gain efficiency.","PeriodicalId":508508,"journal":{"name":"Ruminants","volume":"97 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ruminants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants4020019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-hormone-treated beef steers (n = 1625; 371 ± 8.4 kg) were used to determine the impact of a direct-fed microbial (DFM) on growth performance, carcass characteristics, health parameters, and economic outcomes in finishing beef cattle. Steers were blocked based on initial BW, sorted into three optimal marketing groups for each day of enrollment, randomly assigned to one of two treatments (12 replicates per treatment), and fed for an average of 133 days before harvest. Treatments included the following: (1) control (CON) and (2) 50 mg/head per day of a DFM (BDP) containing Lactobacillus animalis 506, Propionibacterium freudenreichii 507, Bacillus licheniformis 809, and Bacillus subtilis 597 (BOVAMINE DEFEND® Plus). Steers were weighed in drafts by pen on a certified scale at closeout, and both pens within a block were harvested on the same day. Carcass characteristics and liver scores were collected upon slaughter. Data were analyzed as part of a completely randomized block design with the pen as the experimental unit. There was no difference in dry matter intake and final body weight between treatments. The BDP steers exhibited a lower number of total outs (deads and removed) throughout the experiment (p < 0.01). Average daily gain (ADG) tended to be greater (p < 0.06), and feed efficiency (p < 0.01) was greater, for steers receiving BDP. Although there were no statistical differences in hot carcass weight and quality grade between treatments, there was a lower incidence of liver abscess scores (p < 0.01) in the BDP steers. These data suggest that BOVAMINE DEFEND® Plus supplementation improves growth performance during the finishing phase, reduces overall mortality, and improves feed to gain efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种新型直接饲喂微生物菌剂可影响饲养场牛的生长性能并促进其整体健康
使用未经激素处理的肉牛(n = 1625;371 ± 8.4 kg)来确定直接饲喂微生物(DFM)对育成肉牛的生长性能、胴体特征、健康参数和经济效益的影响。根据初始体重对阉牛进行分群,每天将其分为三个最佳销售组,随机分配到两个处理中的一个(每个处理有 12 个重复),并在收获前平均饲喂 133 天。处理包括(1) 对照组(CON);(2) 每天 50 毫克/头的 DFM(BDP),其中含有动物乳杆菌 506、芽孢杆菌 507、地衣芽孢杆菌 809 和枯草芽孢杆菌 597(BOVAMINE DEFEND® Plus)。结账时,用合格的磅秤按栏对阉牛进行称重,同一区块内的两栏阉牛在同一天收获。屠宰时收集胴体特征和肝脏评分。数据分析采用完全随机区组设计,以栏为实验单位。不同处理间的干物质摄入量和最终体重没有差异。在整个实验过程中,BDP 牛的总出栏数(死亡和淘汰)较低(p < 0.01)。接受 BDP 的母牛平均日增重(ADG)往往更高(p < 0.06),饲料效率更高(p < 0.01)。虽然不同处理间的热胴体重量和质量等级没有统计学差异,但 BDP 牛的肝脓肿评分发生率较低(p < 0.01)。这些数据表明,补充 BOVAMINE DEFEND® Plus 可提高育成期的生长性能,降低总死亡率,并提高饲料增重效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metabolomic Profiling, Volatile Fatty Acids, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Beef Cattle Infused with Different Essential Oil Blends The Effects of Breed, Lactation Number, and Lameness on the Behavior, Production, and Reproduction of Lactating Dairy Cows in Central Texas Evaluating the Bias of Two Point-of-Care Glucometers for Calves and Ewes: Awareness for Ruminant Practitioners A Novel Direct-Fed Microbial Impacts Growth Performance and Supports Overall Health of Feedlot Cattle Estimation of Genetic Parameters for Litter Size and Growth Traits in a Prolific Line of Tunisian Barbarine Sheep
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1