Bioequivalence of Rivaroxaban Hard Capsules vs. Film-Coated Tablets in Healthy White Volunteers

Agnieszka Gierczak-Pachulska, M. Kaza, Katarzyna Jarus-Dziedzic, Olga Czerepow-Bielik, A. Segiet-Święcicka, Grzegorz Huszcza, Katarzyna Sidoruk, Daniel Rabczenko, P. Rudzki
{"title":"Bioequivalence of Rivaroxaban Hard Capsules vs. Film-Coated Tablets in Healthy White Volunteers","authors":"Agnieszka Gierczak-Pachulska, M. Kaza, Katarzyna Jarus-Dziedzic, Olga Czerepow-Bielik, A. Segiet-Święcicka, Grzegorz Huszcza, Katarzyna Sidoruk, Daniel Rabczenko, P. Rudzki","doi":"10.32383/appdr/185676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rivaroxaban is an oral anticoagulant that is a selective, direct factor Xa inhibitor. It is used to prevent thrombotic events of atherosclerotic etiology and to prevent stroke and peripheral embolism in adult patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The aim of studies was to assess the bioequivalence of two orally administered products: test (Zarixa hard capsules) vs. reference (Xarelto® film-coated tablets). Two crossover, 2-period, randomized, open-label, laboratory-blinded studies were conducted in healthy White male and female volunteers. A single oral dose (Study 1: 10 mg fasting, Study 2: 20 mg fed) of the test or reference product was followed by a minimum 7-day washout. Blood was collected up to 48 h after administration. Plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The bioequivalence criteria for 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the log-transformed geometric mean ratios (test/reference) for the two primary pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0-t) and Cmax) were set at 80.00-125.00%. Vital signs, laboratory parameters, and adverse events were monitored. 34 of 36 volunteers completed Study 1, and geometric mean ratios were 97.96% (90% CI 93.69-102.42%) for AUC(0-t), and 89.35% (90% CI 84.28-94.72%) for Cmax. All 36 volunteers completed Study 2, and geometric mean ratios were 103.57% (90% CI 98.75-108.63%) for AUC(0-t), and 95.17% (90% CI 87.35-103.70%) for Cmax. All of 90% CIs for the primary pharmacokinetic parameter ratios met acceptance criteria. There were no serious adverse events. Results of both studies indicate that the test product (Zarixa) is bioequivalent to the reference product (Xarelto®). Both products were well tolerated.","PeriodicalId":7135,"journal":{"name":"Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica - Drug Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica - Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32383/appdr/185676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rivaroxaban is an oral anticoagulant that is a selective, direct factor Xa inhibitor. It is used to prevent thrombotic events of atherosclerotic etiology and to prevent stroke and peripheral embolism in adult patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The aim of studies was to assess the bioequivalence of two orally administered products: test (Zarixa hard capsules) vs. reference (Xarelto® film-coated tablets). Two crossover, 2-period, randomized, open-label, laboratory-blinded studies were conducted in healthy White male and female volunteers. A single oral dose (Study 1: 10 mg fasting, Study 2: 20 mg fed) of the test or reference product was followed by a minimum 7-day washout. Blood was collected up to 48 h after administration. Plasma concentrations of rivaroxaban were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The bioequivalence criteria for 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the log-transformed geometric mean ratios (test/reference) for the two primary pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0-t) and Cmax) were set at 80.00-125.00%. Vital signs, laboratory parameters, and adverse events were monitored. 34 of 36 volunteers completed Study 1, and geometric mean ratios were 97.96% (90% CI 93.69-102.42%) for AUC(0-t), and 89.35% (90% CI 84.28-94.72%) for Cmax. All 36 volunteers completed Study 2, and geometric mean ratios were 103.57% (90% CI 98.75-108.63%) for AUC(0-t), and 95.17% (90% CI 87.35-103.70%) for Cmax. All of 90% CIs for the primary pharmacokinetic parameter ratios met acceptance criteria. There were no serious adverse events. Results of both studies indicate that the test product (Zarixa) is bioequivalent to the reference product (Xarelto®). Both products were well tolerated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康白人志愿者服用利伐沙班硬胶囊与薄膜衣片的生物等效性研究
利伐沙班是一种口服抗凝剂,是一种选择性直接 Xa 因子抑制剂。它用于预防动脉粥样硬化引起的血栓事件,以及预防非瓣膜性心房颤动成年患者的中风和外周栓塞。研究旨在评估两种口服产品的生物等效性:试验产品(扎瑞沙硬胶囊)与参照产品(Xarelto® 膜衣片)。在健康的白人男性和女性志愿者中进行了两项交叉、两期、随机、开放标签、实验室盲法研究。试验或参比产品的单次口服剂量(研究 1:空腹 10 毫克;研究 2:进食 20 毫克)后至少要进行 7 天的冲洗。给药后 48 小时内采集血液。采用经过验证的 LC-MS/MS 方法测量利伐沙班的血浆浓度。两个主要药代动力学参数(AUC(0-t) 和 Cmax)的对数变换几何平均比值(试验/参照)的 90% 置信区间 (CI) 的生物等效性标准定为 80.00-125.00%。对生命体征、实验室参数和不良事件进行了监测。36 名志愿者中有 34 人完成了研究 1,AUC(0-t)的几何平均比为 97.96%(90% CI 93.69-102.42%),Cmax 的几何平均比为 89.35%(90% CI 84.28-94.72%)。所有 36 名志愿者都完成了研究 2,AUC(0-t)的几何平均比为 103.57%(90% CI 98.75-108.63%),Cmax 为 95.17%(90% CI 87.35-103.70%)。所有主要药代动力学参数比值的 90% CI 均符合接受标准。没有发生严重不良事件。两项研究结果表明,试验产品(Zarixa)与参比产品(Xarelto®)具有生物等效性。两种产品的耐受性均良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of L-, N- and T-type Calcium Channels in Achieving Maximum Analgesic and Minimum Toxic Effect of Tramadol Validation of Novel High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for Meropenem Quantification in Plasma Development of Method for Determining Topiramate in Various Biological Matrices (Plasma, Saliva, Hair) and Its Application in Clinical Practice Research Progress in the Relationship Between P2X7 and Flavonoids in Cardiovascular Disease Are Polish Hospital Pharmacies Ready for Changes in Drug Distribution?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1