European foreign language policies, national language testing and ambivalence towards the introduction of the logics of standardisation

Q1 Arts and Humanities European Journal of Language Policy Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.3828/ejlp.2024.3
Areti Vogopoulou, Antigone Sarakinioti, Polychronis Sifakakis, A. Tsatsaroni
{"title":"European foreign language policies, national language testing and ambivalence towards the introduction of the logics of standardisation","authors":"Areti Vogopoulou, Antigone Sarakinioti, Polychronis Sifakakis, A. Tsatsaroni","doi":"10.3828/ejlp.2024.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educational policies and priorities shaped at the supranational level by European and global agencies and players impact the processes of national policymaking in complex ways. In this study, recontextualisations of European foreign language education and language assessment policies in the Greek policy and pedagogical contexts are examined. Specifically, the politics of foreign language education and assessment are explored with a focus on English language teaching in public schools and the expected introduction of the Greek National Certificate of Language Proficiency (known as KPG) which is a state-led testing system formed by adopting the six-level scale of the Common European Framework of Reference for languages. Drawing on Bernstein’s theory of symbolic control and pedagogic discourse, it is shown that extensive recontextualisations of European (and global) discourses on English language teaching and assessment in the Greek context project competency and outcome-based curricula and learning as the desirable pedagogic model. Furthermore, attempts to introduce certification procedures in public schools derive from market-driven discourses that sanction a standardised system of student performance while the implications of standardisation for schools, teachers and students alike are downplayed.","PeriodicalId":37640,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Language Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Language Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2024.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational policies and priorities shaped at the supranational level by European and global agencies and players impact the processes of national policymaking in complex ways. In this study, recontextualisations of European foreign language education and language assessment policies in the Greek policy and pedagogical contexts are examined. Specifically, the politics of foreign language education and assessment are explored with a focus on English language teaching in public schools and the expected introduction of the Greek National Certificate of Language Proficiency (known as KPG) which is a state-led testing system formed by adopting the six-level scale of the Common European Framework of Reference for languages. Drawing on Bernstein’s theory of symbolic control and pedagogic discourse, it is shown that extensive recontextualisations of European (and global) discourses on English language teaching and assessment in the Greek context project competency and outcome-based curricula and learning as the desirable pedagogic model. Furthermore, attempts to introduce certification procedures in public schools derive from market-driven discourses that sanction a standardised system of student performance while the implications of standardisation for schools, teachers and students alike are downplayed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲外语政策、国家语言测试和对引入标准化逻辑的矛盾心理
欧洲和全球机构及参与者在超国家层面制定的教育政策和优先事项,以复杂的方式影响着国家政策的制定过程。本研究探讨了欧洲外语教育和语言评估政策在希腊政策和教学背景下的重新语境化。具体而言,本研究探讨了外语教育和评估的政治性,重点是公立学校的英语教学,以及希腊国家语言能力证书(简称 KPG)的预期引入,这是一个由国家主导的测试系统,采用了欧洲语言共同参考框架的六级量表。借鉴伯恩斯坦的符号控制和教学论述理论,研究表明,在希腊语境下,对欧洲(和全球)英语教学和评估论述进行广泛的重新语境化,将基于能力和成果的课程和学习作为理想的教学模式。此外,在公立学校引入认证程序的尝试源于市场驱动的论述,这些论述认可学生成绩的标准化体系,而标准化对学校、教师和学生的影响则被淡化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Language Policy
European Journal of Language Policy Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: European Journal of Language Policy / Revue européenne de politique linguistique is a peer-reviewed journal published by Liverpool University Press in association with the Conseil Européen pour les langues / European Language Council. The journal aims to address major developments in language policy from a European perspective, regarding multilingualism and the diversity of languages as valuable assets in the culture, politics and economics of twenty-first century societies. The journal’s primary focus is on Europe, broadly understood, but it is alert to policy developments in the wider world. European Journal of Language Policy invites proposals or manuscripts of articles studying any aspect of language policy, and any aspect of the area of languages for which policies may need to be developed or changed. It particularly welcomes proposals that provide greater understanding of the factors which contribute to policy-making, and proposals that examine the effects of particular policies on language learning or language use.
期刊最新文献
Can English be a national language in Pakistan? The intergenerational reinforcement of Spanish in Galicia (Spain) European Union politicians debating European language education policy European foreign language policies, national language testing and ambivalence towards the introduction of the logics of standardisation Language exams as a policy instrument
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1