Mahendra U Gaikwad, P. Gaikwad, Nitin Ambhore, Ankit Sharma, Shital S. Bhosale
{"title":"Powder BED Additive Manufacturing using Machine Learning Algorithms\nfor Multidisciplinary Applications: A Review and Outlook","authors":"Mahendra U Gaikwad, P. Gaikwad, Nitin Ambhore, Ankit Sharma, Shital S. Bhosale","doi":"10.2174/0122127976289578240319102303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nAdditive manufacturing overcomes the limitations associated with conventional processes,\nsuch as fabricating complex parts, material wastage, and a number of sequential operations.\nPowder-bed additives fall under the category of additive manufacturing process, which, in recent\nyears, has captured the attention of researchers and scientists working in various fields of science\nand engineering. Production of powder bed additive manufacturing (PBAM) parts with consistent\nand predictable properties of powders used during the manufacturing process plays an important\nrole in deciding printed parts' reliability in aeronautical, automobile, biomedical, and healthcare applications.\nIn the PBAM process, the most commonly used powders are polymer, metal, and ceramic,\nwhich cannot be effectively used without understanding powder particles' physical, mechanical,\nand chemical properties. Several metallic powders like titanium, steel, copper, aluminum, and nickel,\nseveral polymer polyamides (nylon), polylactide, polycarbonate, glass-filled nylon, epoxy resins,\netc., and the most commonly used ceramic powders like aluminum oxide (Al2O) and zirconium oxide\n(ZrO2) can be utilized depending upon the method being adopted during PBAM process. Adoption\nof some post-processing techniques for powder, such as grain refinement can also be employed\nto improve the physical or mechanical properties of powders used for the PBAM process. In this\npaper, the effect of powder parameters, such as particle size, shape, density, and reusing of powder,\netc., on printed parts have been reviewed in detail using characterization techniques such as X-ray\ncomputed tomography, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. This\nhelps to understand the effect of particle size, shape, density, virgin and reused powders, etc., used\nduring the PBAM process. This article has reviewed the selection of appropriate process parameters\nlike laser power, scanning speed, hatch spacing, and layer thickness and their effects on various\nmechanical or physical properties, such as tensile strength, hardness, and the effect of porosity,\nalong with the microstructure evolution. One of the drawbacks of additive manufacturing is the variability\nin the quality of printed parts, which can be eliminated by monitoring the process using machine\nlearning techniques. Also, the prediction of the best combination of process parameters using\nsome advanced machine learning algorithms (MLA), like random forest, k nearest neighbors, and\nsupport vector machine, can be effectively utilized to quantify the performance parameters in the\nPBAM process. Thus, implementing machine learning in the additive manufacturing process not\nonly helps to learn the fundamentals but helps to identify, predict and help to make actionable\nrecommendations that help optimize printed parts quality. The performance of various MLAs has\nbeen evaluated and compared for projecting future research directions and suggestions. In the last\npart of this article, multidisciplinary applications of the PBAM process have been reviewed in detail.\nAdditive manufacturing processes carried out by using conventional machines, called hybrid\nadditive manufacturing, have also been reviewed by discussing their methods and arrangements in\ndetail.\n","PeriodicalId":39169,"journal":{"name":"Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0122127976289578240319102303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Additive manufacturing overcomes the limitations associated with conventional processes,
such as fabricating complex parts, material wastage, and a number of sequential operations.
Powder-bed additives fall under the category of additive manufacturing process, which, in recent
years, has captured the attention of researchers and scientists working in various fields of science
and engineering. Production of powder bed additive manufacturing (PBAM) parts with consistent
and predictable properties of powders used during the manufacturing process plays an important
role in deciding printed parts' reliability in aeronautical, automobile, biomedical, and healthcare applications.
In the PBAM process, the most commonly used powders are polymer, metal, and ceramic,
which cannot be effectively used without understanding powder particles' physical, mechanical,
and chemical properties. Several metallic powders like titanium, steel, copper, aluminum, and nickel,
several polymer polyamides (nylon), polylactide, polycarbonate, glass-filled nylon, epoxy resins,
etc., and the most commonly used ceramic powders like aluminum oxide (Al2O) and zirconium oxide
(ZrO2) can be utilized depending upon the method being adopted during PBAM process. Adoption
of some post-processing techniques for powder, such as grain refinement can also be employed
to improve the physical or mechanical properties of powders used for the PBAM process. In this
paper, the effect of powder parameters, such as particle size, shape, density, and reusing of powder,
etc., on printed parts have been reviewed in detail using characterization techniques such as X-ray
computed tomography, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. This
helps to understand the effect of particle size, shape, density, virgin and reused powders, etc., used
during the PBAM process. This article has reviewed the selection of appropriate process parameters
like laser power, scanning speed, hatch spacing, and layer thickness and their effects on various
mechanical or physical properties, such as tensile strength, hardness, and the effect of porosity,
along with the microstructure evolution. One of the drawbacks of additive manufacturing is the variability
in the quality of printed parts, which can be eliminated by monitoring the process using machine
learning techniques. Also, the prediction of the best combination of process parameters using
some advanced machine learning algorithms (MLA), like random forest, k nearest neighbors, and
support vector machine, can be effectively utilized to quantify the performance parameters in the
PBAM process. Thus, implementing machine learning in the additive manufacturing process not
only helps to learn the fundamentals but helps to identify, predict and help to make actionable
recommendations that help optimize printed parts quality. The performance of various MLAs has
been evaluated and compared for projecting future research directions and suggestions. In the last
part of this article, multidisciplinary applications of the PBAM process have been reviewed in detail.
Additive manufacturing processes carried out by using conventional machines, called hybrid
additive manufacturing, have also been reviewed by discussing their methods and arrangements in
detail.