{"title":"Optimization of Performance, Emissions, and Vibration in a\nHydrogen-Diesel Dual-Fuel Engine Using Response Surface Methodology","authors":"Subani Shaik, Vinay Kumar Domakonda, Farooq Shaik, Anil Kumar T Ch","doi":"10.2174/0122127976322070240621095449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nDual-fuel diesel engines using hydrogen as a secondary fuel source are a\npromising technology for reducing emissions while maintaining engine performance. However, optimizing these engines for all three aspects (performance, emissions, and vibration) simultaneously\npresents a challenge.\n\n\n\nThis study aimed to address this challenge by employing Response Surface Methodology, a statistical technique used to optimize multi-variable processes. The goal was to find the ideal\ncombination of engine load, hydrogen flow rate, and compression ratio that would maximize Brake\nThermal Efficiency while minimizing Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption, Nitrogen Oxide emissions, and engine vibration.\n\n\n\nA Box-Behnken design, a specific type of design optimization with three factors and three\nlevels, was employed. The experiment evaluated the impact of three key factors: engine load (ranging from 0 - 12 kg), hydrogen flow rate (0-15 L/min), and compression ratio (16 to 18:1). The effects of these factors on performance, emissions, and vibration were measured.\n\n\n\nThe results revealed a trade-off between achieving optimal performance and minimizing\nemissions. The highest Brake Thermal Efficiency and lowest Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption\nwere achieved at a high compression ratio (18:1), maximum hydrogen flow rate (15 L/min), and\nunder full engine load (12 kg), corresponding to a brake power of 3.5 kW. However, these conditions also resulted in higher NOx emissions and vibration levels. Conversely, minimizing NOx and\nvibration occurred at a lower compression ratio (16:1), with the same maximum hydrogen flow rate\n(15 L/min), but at a significantly reduced engine load (3 kg), resulting in a much lower brake power\nof 0.875 kW.\n\n\n\nThese findings highlight the complex relationship between performance, emissions,\nand vibration in a hydrogen-diesel dual-fuel engine optimized using Response Surface Methodology. While optimal conditions were identified for specific goals, achieving all desired characteristics\nsimultaneously across the entire operating range remains a challenge.\n","PeriodicalId":39169,"journal":{"name":"Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering","volume":" 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0122127976322070240621095449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dual-fuel diesel engines using hydrogen as a secondary fuel source are a
promising technology for reducing emissions while maintaining engine performance. However, optimizing these engines for all three aspects (performance, emissions, and vibration) simultaneously
presents a challenge.
This study aimed to address this challenge by employing Response Surface Methodology, a statistical technique used to optimize multi-variable processes. The goal was to find the ideal
combination of engine load, hydrogen flow rate, and compression ratio that would maximize Brake
Thermal Efficiency while minimizing Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption, Nitrogen Oxide emissions, and engine vibration.
A Box-Behnken design, a specific type of design optimization with three factors and three
levels, was employed. The experiment evaluated the impact of three key factors: engine load (ranging from 0 - 12 kg), hydrogen flow rate (0-15 L/min), and compression ratio (16 to 18:1). The effects of these factors on performance, emissions, and vibration were measured.
The results revealed a trade-off between achieving optimal performance and minimizing
emissions. The highest Brake Thermal Efficiency and lowest Brake-Specific Fuel Consumption
were achieved at a high compression ratio (18:1), maximum hydrogen flow rate (15 L/min), and
under full engine load (12 kg), corresponding to a brake power of 3.5 kW. However, these conditions also resulted in higher NOx emissions and vibration levels. Conversely, minimizing NOx and
vibration occurred at a lower compression ratio (16:1), with the same maximum hydrogen flow rate
(15 L/min), but at a significantly reduced engine load (3 kg), resulting in a much lower brake power
of 0.875 kW.
These findings highlight the complex relationship between performance, emissions,
and vibration in a hydrogen-diesel dual-fuel engine optimized using Response Surface Methodology. While optimal conditions were identified for specific goals, achieving all desired characteristics
simultaneously across the entire operating range remains a challenge.