Exploring Antecedents of Consumers’ Green and Materialistic Values Conflict: The Case of Baltic Economy

Rita Markauskaitė, Aušra Rūtelionė, Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto
{"title":"Exploring Antecedents of Consumers’ Green and Materialistic Values Conflict: The Case of Baltic Economy","authors":"Rita Markauskaitė, Aušra Rūtelionė, Muhammad Yaseen Bhutto","doi":"10.5755/j01.erem.80.1.35557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In societies where consumers hold both green and materialistic values, which can be described as incompatible values, a conflict of values arises. Previous research on the green and materialistic value conflict has focused mainly on their negative consequences for consumer well-being. The antecedents of green and materialistic value conflict remain unclear. This research aims to determine the antecedents of consumers’ green and materialistic value conflict. Using a quantitative research strategy, data were collected following the survey method. The results of this research reveal that the effect of impulsive buying on the conflict between green and materialistic values is significant and positive, which means that impulsive buying reinforces the value conflict. Furthermore, the results show that the effect of mindfulness on the conflict between green and materialistic values is significant and negative, which means that mindfulness reduces the value conflict. These findings add substantially to our understanding of antecedents by adding new knowledge on the relatively under-researched antecedents of the conflict between green and materialistic values.","PeriodicalId":11703,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research, Engineering and Management","volume":"71 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research, Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.80.1.35557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In societies where consumers hold both green and materialistic values, which can be described as incompatible values, a conflict of values arises. Previous research on the green and materialistic value conflict has focused mainly on their negative consequences for consumer well-being. The antecedents of green and materialistic value conflict remain unclear. This research aims to determine the antecedents of consumers’ green and materialistic value conflict. Using a quantitative research strategy, data were collected following the survey method. The results of this research reveal that the effect of impulsive buying on the conflict between green and materialistic values is significant and positive, which means that impulsive buying reinforces the value conflict. Furthermore, the results show that the effect of mindfulness on the conflict between green and materialistic values is significant and negative, which means that mindfulness reduces the value conflict. These findings add substantially to our understanding of antecedents by adding new knowledge on the relatively under-researched antecedents of the conflict between green and materialistic values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索消费者绿色价值观与物质价值观冲突的前因:波罗的海经济案例
在一些社会中,消费者同时持有绿色价值观和物质主义价值观,这两种价值观可以说是互不相容的,于是就产生了价值观冲突。以往关于绿色和物质主义价值冲突的研究主要集中在它们对消费者福祉的负面影响上。绿色价值观和物质价值观冲突的前因仍不清楚。本研究旨在确定消费者绿色和物质价值冲突的前因。研究采用定量研究策略,通过调查法收集数据。研究结果表明,冲动性购买对绿色价值观和物质价值观冲突的影响是显著的、正向的,这意味着冲动性购买强化了价值观冲突。此外,研究结果表明,正念对绿色价值观和物质价值观之间冲突的影响是显著的、负的,这意味着正念会减少价值冲突。这些研究结果大大加深了我们对前因后果的理解,为研究相对不足的绿色价值观与物质价值观冲突的前因后果增添了新的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Research, Engineering and Management
Environmental Research, Engineering and Management Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: First published in 1995, the journal Environmental Research, Engineering and Management (EREM) is an international multidisciplinary journal designed to serve as a roadmap for understanding complex issues and debates of sustainable development. EREM publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers which cover research in the fields of environmental science, engineering (pollution prevention, resource efficiency), management, energy (renewables), agricultural and biological sciences, and social sciences. EREM’s topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following: environmental research, ecological monitoring, and climate change; environmental pollution – impact assessment, mitigation, and prevention; environmental engineering, sustainable production, and eco innovations; environmental management, strategy, standards, social responsibility; environmental economics, policy, and law; sustainable consumption and education.
期刊最新文献
Challenge of Rainfall Uncertainty in the Study of Deficit Irrigation A Study on Heavy Metal Contamination of Yard Soils and its Remediation Potential by Weedy Species Performance Investigation of Surface Modified Ceramic Microfiltration Membranes of Ionic Water Treatment Production of Xanthan Gum from Inedible Parts of Broccoli and Cauliflower Assessment of Household Waste Generation and Management in Rural Areas: A Case Study in Ha Nam Province, Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1