Non‐chemical weed management for sustainable rice production in the Ebro Delta

Weed Research Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1111/wre.12628
Alfred Palma‐Guillén, Miquel Salicrú, Ariadna Nadal, X. Serrat, Salvador Nogués
{"title":"Non‐chemical weed management for sustainable rice production in the Ebro Delta","authors":"Alfred Palma‐Guillén, Miquel Salicrú, Ariadna Nadal, X. Serrat, Salvador Nogués","doi":"10.1111/wre.12628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weed control is one of the major challenges in rice cultivation, and the use of agrochemicals for this crop is severely restricted under the new European agricultural policy. Therefore, new effective non‐chemical weed control techniques are the key to sustain European rice production. We investigated four non‐chemical weed management strategies in the Ebro Delta in north‐eastern Spain, two in dry‐seeded rice fields and two in water‐seeded rice fields. In addition, two controls per sowing condition were included: a positive control consisting of chemical herbicides treatment and a negative control consisting of no weeding and no seeding. Mechanical weeding using a rotary harrow placed in front of the seeder was the best weeding technique for dry seeding, while ‘stale seed bed’ and transplanting was the best performing technique for wet seeding. Both techniques were as effective as the chemical weeding control, reducing the density of weeds and the supplementary manual weeding time needed for those weed species more abundant in Ebro Delta rice fields (i.e., Echinochloa oryzoides, Echinochloa crus‐galli, Bolboschoenus maritimus and Heteranthera reniformis). Thus, non‐chemical weeding alternatives have been proven effective for both, transplanting and dry seeding field management strategies.","PeriodicalId":506547,"journal":{"name":"Weed Research","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Weed control is one of the major challenges in rice cultivation, and the use of agrochemicals for this crop is severely restricted under the new European agricultural policy. Therefore, new effective non‐chemical weed control techniques are the key to sustain European rice production. We investigated four non‐chemical weed management strategies in the Ebro Delta in north‐eastern Spain, two in dry‐seeded rice fields and two in water‐seeded rice fields. In addition, two controls per sowing condition were included: a positive control consisting of chemical herbicides treatment and a negative control consisting of no weeding and no seeding. Mechanical weeding using a rotary harrow placed in front of the seeder was the best weeding technique for dry seeding, while ‘stale seed bed’ and transplanting was the best performing technique for wet seeding. Both techniques were as effective as the chemical weeding control, reducing the density of weeds and the supplementary manual weeding time needed for those weed species more abundant in Ebro Delta rice fields (i.e., Echinochloa oryzoides, Echinochloa crus‐galli, Bolboschoenus maritimus and Heteranthera reniformis). Thus, non‐chemical weeding alternatives have been proven effective for both, transplanting and dry seeding field management strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃布罗河三角洲水稻可持续生产中的非化学杂草管理
杂草控制是水稻种植面临的主要挑战之一,而在新的欧洲农业政策下,这种作物的农用化学品使用受到严格限制。因此,新的有效非化学杂草控制技术是维持欧洲水稻生产的关键。我们在西班牙东北部的埃布罗三角洲调查了四种非化学杂草管理策略,其中两种用于旱播稻田,两种用于水播稻田。此外,每个播种条件还包括两个对照组:一个阳性对照组包括化学除草剂处理,另一个阴性对照组包括不除草和不播种。使用放置在播种机前的旋转耙进行机械除草是干播的最佳除草技术,而 "陈旧苗床 "和移栽是湿播的最佳技术。对于埃布罗河三角洲稻田中较多的杂草种类(即 Echinochloa oryzoides、Echinochloa crus-galli、Bolboschoenus maritimus 和 Heteranthera reniformis),这两种技术与化学除草控制一样有效,都能降低杂草密度,并减少所需的辅助人工除草时间。因此,事实证明,非化学除草替代方法对移栽和旱育秧田管理策略都很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of gap size in grass cover on the percentage and rate of dandelion achene germination Environmental factors determining weed species distribution in organic manure and inorganic fertiliser smallholder maize (Zea mays L.) production Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson reproduction system: Implications for distribution and management strategies Non‐chemical weed management for sustainable rice production in the Ebro Delta The influence of farm resources and management decisions on the severity of Striga infestation and maize productivity in western Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1