Achieving banking industry innovation performance using total quality management: an empirical study

Abraham Ato Ahinful, Abigail Opoku Mensah, Samuel Koomson, Collins Cobblah, Godfred Takyi, Abdul Hamid Kwarteng
{"title":"Achieving banking industry innovation performance using total quality management: an empirical study","authors":"Abraham Ato Ahinful, Abigail Opoku Mensah, Samuel Koomson, Collins Cobblah, Godfred Takyi, Abdul Hamid Kwarteng","doi":"10.1108/tqm-10-2023-0327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWhile scholars have researched the impact of specific total quality management (TQM) aspects on innovation performance (INP), empirical evidence on how the former, as a composite construct, influences the latter is rare. To add, empirical evidence on the mechanism through which TQM passes to affect innovative behaviour (INB) and, then, INP is limited. Essentially, scholars have requested that future research look at the boundary conditions that support the adoption of TQM activities in businesses. Although the banking sector has experienced a number of transformations, there is still a need to raise the standard of service provided to bank customers. This research sheds more light on this subject.Design/methodology/approachThis research tests the hypotheses in Ahinful et al.’s (2023) conceptual model using responses from 260 top- and middle-level bank managers by applying Smart PLS. Organisational support and team member exchange were used as potential control variables for the mediator, while slack resources and bank size were applied to the target endogenous latent construct. Mediation and moderation effects were estimated using the variance accounted for (VAF) and product indicator approaches, respectively. Sig. level was set at 5%.FindingsThis study found that TQM and INP had a positive and significant connection (ß = 0.303, p = 0.000), and INB partially mediated this connection (VAF = 40.92%). However, government regulation (GOV; ß = 0.055, p = 0.365), market dynamism (MKD; ß = 0.063, p = 0.434), competitive intensity (CMP; ß = 0.069, p = 0.297) and technological turbulence (TUR; ß = 0.011, p = 0.865) all failed to moderate the TQM–INB connection, although the expected positive directions of these moderation relationships were established.Research limitations/implicationsThis research provides empirical evidence on the TQM–INP connection, how this connection may be mediated and how the TQM–INB connection may be activated. It also sheds light on novel ways in which service quality in the banking sector may be improved. Upcoming research may explore other control variables in their research. Since the moderating relationships were unsupported, this avenue is open for further research, particularly in other banking settings across the globe.Practical implicationsPractical lessons for bank consultants, regulators, customers, employees and managers are deliberated.Originality/valueThis research is novel. It is the first to test the hypotheses in Ahinful et al.’s (2023) conceptual model. This study advances the theoretical frameworks and existing knowledge within the TQM, innovation and performance management fields.","PeriodicalId":508533,"journal":{"name":"The TQM Journal","volume":"38 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The TQM Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-10-2023-0327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeWhile scholars have researched the impact of specific total quality management (TQM) aspects on innovation performance (INP), empirical evidence on how the former, as a composite construct, influences the latter is rare. To add, empirical evidence on the mechanism through which TQM passes to affect innovative behaviour (INB) and, then, INP is limited. Essentially, scholars have requested that future research look at the boundary conditions that support the adoption of TQM activities in businesses. Although the banking sector has experienced a number of transformations, there is still a need to raise the standard of service provided to bank customers. This research sheds more light on this subject.Design/methodology/approachThis research tests the hypotheses in Ahinful et al.’s (2023) conceptual model using responses from 260 top- and middle-level bank managers by applying Smart PLS. Organisational support and team member exchange were used as potential control variables for the mediator, while slack resources and bank size were applied to the target endogenous latent construct. Mediation and moderation effects were estimated using the variance accounted for (VAF) and product indicator approaches, respectively. Sig. level was set at 5%.FindingsThis study found that TQM and INP had a positive and significant connection (ß = 0.303, p = 0.000), and INB partially mediated this connection (VAF = 40.92%). However, government regulation (GOV; ß = 0.055, p = 0.365), market dynamism (MKD; ß = 0.063, p = 0.434), competitive intensity (CMP; ß = 0.069, p = 0.297) and technological turbulence (TUR; ß = 0.011, p = 0.865) all failed to moderate the TQM–INB connection, although the expected positive directions of these moderation relationships were established.Research limitations/implicationsThis research provides empirical evidence on the TQM–INP connection, how this connection may be mediated and how the TQM–INB connection may be activated. It also sheds light on novel ways in which service quality in the banking sector may be improved. Upcoming research may explore other control variables in their research. Since the moderating relationships were unsupported, this avenue is open for further research, particularly in other banking settings across the globe.Practical implicationsPractical lessons for bank consultants, regulators, customers, employees and managers are deliberated.Originality/valueThis research is novel. It is the first to test the hypotheses in Ahinful et al.’s (2023) conceptual model. This study advances the theoretical frameworks and existing knowledge within the TQM, innovation and performance management fields.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用全面质量管理实现银行业创新绩效:实证研究
目的虽然学者们已经研究了全面质量管理(TQM)的具体方面对创新绩效(INP)的影响,但关于前者作为一个综合结构如何影响后者的实证证据却很少。此外,关于全面质量管理通过何种机制影响创新行为(INB)进而影响 INP 的经验证据也很有限。从根本上说,学者们要求未来的研究关注支持企业采用全面质量管理活动的边界条件。尽管银行业经历了一系列变革,但仍有必要提高为银行客户提供服务的标准。本研究对这一主题进行了深入探讨。设计/方法/途径本研究采用智能 PLS,通过 260 位银行中高层管理人员的回答,对 Ahinful 等人(2023 年)的概念模型中的假设进行了检验。组织支持和团队成员交流被用作中介变量的潜在控制变量,而松弛资源和银行规模则被应用于目标内生潜构。中介效应和调节效应分别采用方差占比法(VAF)和乘积指标法进行估计。研究结果本研究发现,全面质量管理与 INP 存在显著的正向联系(ß = 0.303,p = 0.000),INB 对这种联系起到了部分中介作用(VAF = 40.92%)。然而,政府监管(GOV; ß = 0.055, p = 0.365)、市场活力(MKD; ß = 0.063, p = 0.434)、竞争强度(CMP; ß = 0.069, p = 0.297)和技术动荡(TUR; ß = 0.011, p = 0.研究局限/意义:本研究提供了有关 TQM-INP 关联、这种关联如何被中介以及 TQM-INB 关联如何被激活的经验证据。研究还揭示了提高银行业服务质量的新方法。未来的研究可能会探索其他控制变量。由于调节关系未得到支持,因此这一途径有待进一步研究,特别是在全球其他银行业环境中。它首次检验了 Ahinful 等人(2023 年)概念模型中的假设。本研究推进了全面质量管理、创新和绩效管理领域的理论框架和现有知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing Industry 4.0 implementation maturity in manufacturing MSMEs – a graph theory and matrix-based approach Assessing Lean Six Sigma and quality performance improvement in Italian public healthcare organizations: a validated scale Application of an approach integrating the Kano model and the fuzzy systems theory: a strategic analysis of consumer satisfaction scores The impact of TQM on financial and non-financial performance: the mediating role of corporate social responsibility A novel framework for understanding the interplay between the mobile wallet service quality dimensions and loyalty intention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1