The Obligation to Establish and Uphold Judicial Independence under Article 19(1) TEU

Vetle Seierstad
{"title":"The Obligation to Establish and Uphold Judicial Independence under Article 19(1) TEU","authors":"Vetle Seierstad","doi":"10.36969/njel.v7i1.25323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the obligation of Member States, under Article 19(1) TEU, to uphold the judicial independence of all national courts who ‘may’ rule on Union law. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) first set out this obligation in their seminal ruling in Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses and has since developed an extensive case-law. This article explores and discusses that case-law with the purpose of setting out, in a general manner, the key obligations Member States have under Article 19(1) TEU. Furthermore, where the ECJ has only set out general requirements without detailing their content, this article expands on the case-law by supplementing and contrasting solutions provided to similar issues in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the recommendations of the Venice Commission and in wider International Human Rights Law. Finally, this article discusses whether judicial independence can be balanced against other aims, concerns and goals, and what room that leaves Member States to justify potential restrictions on judicial independence by the pursuit of (other) legitimate objectives.","PeriodicalId":489206,"journal":{"name":"Nordic journal of european law","volume":"212 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic journal of european law","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v7i1.25323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the obligation of Member States, under Article 19(1) TEU, to uphold the judicial independence of all national courts who ‘may’ rule on Union law. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) first set out this obligation in their seminal ruling in Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses and has since developed an extensive case-law. This article explores and discusses that case-law with the purpose of setting out, in a general manner, the key obligations Member States have under Article 19(1) TEU. Furthermore, where the ECJ has only set out general requirements without detailing their content, this article expands on the case-law by supplementing and contrasting solutions provided to similar issues in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the recommendations of the Venice Commission and in wider International Human Rights Law. Finally, this article discusses whether judicial independence can be balanced against other aims, concerns and goals, and what room that leaves Member States to justify potential restrictions on judicial independence by the pursuit of (other) legitimate objectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据《欧盟条约》第 19(1)条确立和维护司法独立的义务
本文探讨了《欧盟条约》(TEU)第 19(1)条规定的成员国维护所有 "可能 "就欧盟法律做出裁决的国内法院的司法独立性的义务。欧洲法院(ECJ)在其对 Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses 案的开创性裁决中首次提出了这一义务,并在此后制定了广泛的判例法。本文对该判例法进行了探讨和讨论,旨在概括性地阐明成员国根据《欧盟条约》第 19(1) 条应承担的主要义务。此外,在欧洲法院仅提出一般性要求而未详细说明其内容的情况下,本文通过补充和对比欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)判例法、威尼斯委员会建议以及更广泛的国际人权法中对类似问题提供的解决方案,对判例法进行了扩展。最后,本文讨论了司法独立是否可以与其他目的、关切和目标相平衡,以及会员国在通过追求(其他)合法目标来证明对司法独立的潜在限制是合理的方面还有多大余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digitalisation in EU Competition Law and the Swedish Principle of Transparency Transparency Unveiled: Access to Information in Digital Markets Act Proceedings at Member State Level – The German and Austrian Experience Digitalisation of the Preliminary Investigation Phase, Fundamental and Human Rights and the Principle of Openness - Balancing Conflicting Interests in the Review of Large Data Sets EU Competition Law, Fundamental Rights and the Principle of Transparency – An Evolving Relationship A Few Words on Drittwirkung, Transparency and Personal Integrity in the Light of Digitalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1