EU Competition Law, Fundamental Rights and the Principle of Transparency – An Evolving Relationship

Cristina Teleki
{"title":"EU Competition Law, Fundamental Rights and the Principle of Transparency – An Evolving Relationship","authors":"Cristina Teleki","doi":"10.36969/njel.v7i2.26230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Faced with the challenges posed by gatekeepers, EU competition law is undergoing a period of significant change. I attempt to show in this article that one can understand this change as a shift in the relationship between EU competition law and fundamental rights. More precisely, I show that the initial relationship between these two factors has been operational, in the sense that fundamental rights have been relied upon to operationalize the substance of competition law. In the operational relationship, the right to a fair trial has been deployed by the European Commission to create and expand its quasi-judicial arm. This long-standing operational relationship has recently evolved into an informative one, where the rights to privacy and data protection have informed the European Commission’s merger assessments involving gatekeepers. Finally, I argue that, in light of the Meta/Facebook case and recent EU legislation, the relationship between EU competition law and fundamental rights can be called foundational. Indeed, it appears that both the CJEU and EU legislators intend to inject fundamental rights into the foundations of EU competition law. I also highlight how the principle of transparency has played an important role in these developments as an enabler and magnifier. These changes are significant and will impact the work of competition authorities, data protection authorities and other public bodies in the EU.","PeriodicalId":489206,"journal":{"name":"Nordic journal of european law","volume":"121 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic journal of european law","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v7i2.26230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Faced with the challenges posed by gatekeepers, EU competition law is undergoing a period of significant change. I attempt to show in this article that one can understand this change as a shift in the relationship between EU competition law and fundamental rights. More precisely, I show that the initial relationship between these two factors has been operational, in the sense that fundamental rights have been relied upon to operationalize the substance of competition law. In the operational relationship, the right to a fair trial has been deployed by the European Commission to create and expand its quasi-judicial arm. This long-standing operational relationship has recently evolved into an informative one, where the rights to privacy and data protection have informed the European Commission’s merger assessments involving gatekeepers. Finally, I argue that, in light of the Meta/Facebook case and recent EU legislation, the relationship between EU competition law and fundamental rights can be called foundational. Indeed, it appears that both the CJEU and EU legislators intend to inject fundamental rights into the foundations of EU competition law. I also highlight how the principle of transparency has played an important role in these developments as an enabler and magnifier. These changes are significant and will impact the work of competition authorities, data protection authorities and other public bodies in the EU.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟竞争法、基本权利和透明度原则--不断演变的关系
面对守门人带来的挑战,欧盟竞争法正在经历一个重大变革时期。我试图在本文中说明,我们可以将这种变化理解为欧盟竞争法与基本权利之间关系的转变。更确切地说,我表明这两个因素之间最初的关系是可操作的,即基本权利被用来操作竞争法的实质内容。在操作关系中,欧盟委员会利用公平审判权创建并扩大了其准司法部门。这种长期存在的运作关系最近演变成了一种信息关系,即隐私权和数据保护权为欧盟委员会涉及把关人的兼并评估提供了依据。最后,我认为,鉴于 Meta/Facebook 案和欧盟最近的立法,欧盟竞争法与基本权利之间的关系可谓是基础性的。事实上,欧盟法院和欧盟立法者似乎都有意将基本权利注入欧盟竞争法的基础。我还强调了透明度原则如何在这些发展中发挥了重要的促进和放大作用。这些变化意义重大,将对欧盟竞争管理机构、数据保护机构和其他公共机构的工作产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digitalisation in EU Competition Law and the Swedish Principle of Transparency Transparency Unveiled: Access to Information in Digital Markets Act Proceedings at Member State Level – The German and Austrian Experience Digitalisation of the Preliminary Investigation Phase, Fundamental and Human Rights and the Principle of Openness - Balancing Conflicting Interests in the Review of Large Data Sets EU Competition Law, Fundamental Rights and the Principle of Transparency – An Evolving Relationship A Few Words on Drittwirkung, Transparency and Personal Integrity in the Light of Digitalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1