Popotovanje motiva lepe Vide od Ivana Cankarja do Matjaža Kmecla in Rudija Šelige

Q2 Arts and Humanities Jezik in Slovstvo Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.4312/jis.69.1-2.11-21
Mateja Pezdirc Bartol, Tomaž Toporišič
{"title":"Popotovanje motiva lepe Vide od Ivana Cankarja do Matjaža Kmecla in Rudija Šelige","authors":"Mateja Pezdirc Bartol, Tomaž Toporišič","doi":"10.4312/jis.69.1-2.11-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay revolves around an intriguing part of the still relatively unexplored dramatic opus of Matjaž Kmecl, in which the author explores the Slovenian mythical motif of the beautiful Vida. The analysis focuses on his mono-drama Lepa Vida ali problem svetega Ožbalta (Beautiful Vida or the Problem of Saint Ožbalt), through which the author enters into a dialogical relationship with a series of Slovenian authors who interpret this key myth of Slovenian literature. The play is a specific continuation of Cankar’s Beautiful Vida, primarily through occasional references to the central motif. On the one hand, the essay will explore the relationship between Kmecl’s Beautiful Vida and Cankar’s prototext. On the other hand, attention will be given to two interpretations of the motif of the beautiful Vida in the 1970s, when Matjaž Kmecl and Rudi Šeligo reimagined and reinterpreted it in innovative ways. These interpretations will be compared and placed in the broader context of contemporary Slovenian drama. While Cankar’s Beautiful Vida was already a vision of longing, and Šeligo’s Vida attempts to formally follow the narrative of a folk song but offers its own and partly new vision of Beautiful Vida through the reinterpretation of lyrical work. But it is Kmecl who radically breaks away from the Slovenian myth, freeing it from Prešeren’s dichotomy and Cankar’s longing.","PeriodicalId":52517,"journal":{"name":"Jezik in Slovstvo","volume":"11 S10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jezik in Slovstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4312/jis.69.1-2.11-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The essay revolves around an intriguing part of the still relatively unexplored dramatic opus of Matjaž Kmecl, in which the author explores the Slovenian mythical motif of the beautiful Vida. The analysis focuses on his mono-drama Lepa Vida ali problem svetega Ožbalta (Beautiful Vida or the Problem of Saint Ožbalt), through which the author enters into a dialogical relationship with a series of Slovenian authors who interpret this key myth of Slovenian literature. The play is a specific continuation of Cankar’s Beautiful Vida, primarily through occasional references to the central motif. On the one hand, the essay will explore the relationship between Kmecl’s Beautiful Vida and Cankar’s prototext. On the other hand, attention will be given to two interpretations of the motif of the beautiful Vida in the 1970s, when Matjaž Kmecl and Rudi Šeligo reimagined and reinterpreted it in innovative ways. These interpretations will be compared and placed in the broader context of contemporary Slovenian drama. While Cankar’s Beautiful Vida was already a vision of longing, and Šeligo’s Vida attempts to formally follow the narrative of a folk song but offers its own and partly new vision of Beautiful Vida through the reinterpretation of lyrical work. But it is Kmecl who radically breaks away from the Slovenian myth, freeing it from Prešeren’s dichotomy and Cankar’s longing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 Ivan Cankar 到 Matjaž Kmecl 和 Rudi Šeliga 的美丽 Vida 主题之旅
这篇文章围绕马特雅斯-克梅克尔(Matjaž Kmecl)戏剧作品中仍相对未被发掘的引人入胜的部分展开,作者在其中探讨了斯洛文尼亚神话中的美丽维达主题。分析的重点是他的单人剧《美丽的维达或圣奥兹巴尔特的问题》(Lepa Vida ali problem svetega Ožbalta),通过该剧,作者与一系列斯洛文尼亚作家建立了对话关系,这些作家对斯洛文尼亚文学中的这一重要神话进行了诠释。该剧是坎卡尔《美丽的维达》的具体延续,主要是通过对中心主题的偶尔引用。一方面,文章将探讨 Kmecl 的《美丽的维达》与坎卡尔的原著文本之间的关系。另一方面,文章将关注 20 世纪 70 年代对 "美丽的维达 "这一主题的两种诠释,当时马特雅斯-克梅尔和鲁迪-舍利戈以创新的方式重新想象和诠释了这一主题。我们将对这些诠释进行比较,并将其置于斯洛文尼亚当代戏剧的更广阔背景中。坎卡尔的《美丽的维达》已经是对渴望的憧憬,Šeligo 的《维达》试图在形式上遵循民歌的叙事方式,但通过对抒情作品的重新诠释,对《美丽的维达》提出了自己的、部分全新的看法。然而,正是 Kmecl 从根本上打破了斯洛文尼亚神话,将其从 Prešeren 的二分法和 Cankar 的渴望中解放出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jezik in Slovstvo
Jezik in Slovstvo Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of corrections of upper-case/lower-case initials in the Šolar and Lektor corpora Kaj pomeni ljubezen do slovenščine? Popotovanje motiva lepe Vide od Ivana Cankarja do Matjaža Kmecla in Rudija Šelige Selected essays by Matjaž Kmecl Po spletnih sledeh Matjaža Kmecla
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1