Legal Framework of the Direct Line in the European Union Law

Justyna Kanas
{"title":"Legal Framework of the Direct Line in the European Union Law","authors":"Justyna Kanas","doi":"10.54648/eelr2024005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a legal analysis of the direct line in the legislation of the European Union. The direct line, serving as a legal instrument to implement offgrid solutions, plays a crucial role in amplifying competition within the energy market. Compared to other instruments introduced by the First Liberalization Package in 1992, the direct line is not a subject commonly brought about by legal literature. The core part of legal analyses is divided into two parts, which focus on different approaches of direct line, i.e., European Union and selected Member States (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland). The motives of the Union in establishing the direct line instrument was to support opening the energy market to increase energy generating units. During the transposition of the direct line into national laws, analysed countries have directed the usage of this mechanism to promote renewable energy sources. The presented case studies create a rare pattern of how the Member States form their own interpretations and hence use the Union law in practice, which differs from the direction established in the Union forum. The research focused on legal dogmatic examining of regulations at both European and national levels, with a particular emphasis on the definition part while figuring a crucial role in shaping the direct line concept. The paper also presents other convoluted legal schemes, such as the permit issuance process for direct line construction. The conclusions assess the modifications in the European Union regime, but also their impact on electricity prices and green investments.\ndirect line, energy market, liberalization, energy transformation, energy security, energy law, European Union","PeriodicalId":53610,"journal":{"name":"European Energy and Environmental Law Review","volume":"443 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Energy and Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eelr2024005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides a legal analysis of the direct line in the legislation of the European Union. The direct line, serving as a legal instrument to implement offgrid solutions, plays a crucial role in amplifying competition within the energy market. Compared to other instruments introduced by the First Liberalization Package in 1992, the direct line is not a subject commonly brought about by legal literature. The core part of legal analyses is divided into two parts, which focus on different approaches of direct line, i.e., European Union and selected Member States (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland). The motives of the Union in establishing the direct line instrument was to support opening the energy market to increase energy generating units. During the transposition of the direct line into national laws, analysed countries have directed the usage of this mechanism to promote renewable energy sources. The presented case studies create a rare pattern of how the Member States form their own interpretations and hence use the Union law in practice, which differs from the direction established in the Union forum. The research focused on legal dogmatic examining of regulations at both European and national levels, with a particular emphasis on the definition part while figuring a crucial role in shaping the direct line concept. The paper also presents other convoluted legal schemes, such as the permit issuance process for direct line construction. The conclusions assess the modifications in the European Union regime, but also their impact on electricity prices and green investments. direct line, energy market, liberalization, energy transformation, energy security, energy law, European Union
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟法律中直通车的法律框架
本文从法律角度对欧盟立法中的直接电网进行了分析。作为实施离网解决方案的法律工具,直供线路在扩大能源市场竞争方面发挥着至关重要的作用。与 1992 年《第一个自由化一揽子计划》引入的其他工具相比,直接电网并不是法律文献中常见的主题。法律分析的核心部分分为两部分,分别关注直接线的不同方法,即欧盟和部分成员国(爱沙尼亚、拉脱维亚、立陶宛和波兰)。欧盟制定直接补贴工具的动机是支持开放能源市场以增加能源生产单位。在将直接补贴纳入国家法律的过程中,所分析的国家引导使用这一机制来推广可再生能源。所介绍的案例研究创造了一种罕见的模式,即成员国如何形成自己的解释,从而在实践中使用欧盟法律,这与欧盟论坛确定的方向不同。研究的重点是对欧洲和国家层面的法规进行法律教条式的审查,特别强调定义部分,因为定义在形成直系概念方面起着至关重要的作用。本文还介绍了其他错综复杂的法律方案,如直达线路建设许可证的发放程序。结论不仅评估了欧盟制度的修改,还评估了这些修改对电价和绿色投资的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Framework of the Direct Line in the European Union Law Regulating Industrial Emissions, Water Management or Aquatic Biodiversity? Navigating the Evolving European Legal Landscape on Waters Nature Restoration and Agriculture and Forestry: At the Opposite Side of the Fighting Ring or Compatible After All? An Analysis of the Proposal and the Final Agreement on the Nature Restoration Law Pandemics and Climate Change as Systemic Risks: Law, Policy, Insurance, Physical Activity and Exercise as Mitigating Environmental Degradation Mechanisms Strengthening European Energy Security and Resilience through Minerals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1