Family cancer caregiver use of and benefit from an internet-delivered insomnia intervention: results from a single-group feasibility trial

K. Shaffer, J. Glazer, Philip I. Chow, Karen S. Ingersoll, Lee Ritterband
{"title":"Family cancer caregiver use of and benefit from an internet-delivered insomnia intervention: results from a single-group feasibility trial","authors":"K. Shaffer, J. Glazer, Philip I. Chow, Karen S. Ingersoll, Lee Ritterband","doi":"10.1097/or9.0000000000000129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Cancer caregivers are more likely to report clinically significant symptoms of insomnia than patients with cancer and the general population, yet research has been limited regarding cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) among this population.\n \n \n \n To better understand cancer caregivers' engagement with and benefit from CBT-I, cancer caregivers were enrolled in a nonrandomized pilot feasibility trial of an evidence-based Internet-delivered insomnia program. Thirteen caregivers completed mixed-methods assessments before receiving the insomnia program and after the nine-week intervention period.\n \n \n \n Compared with the five caregivers who did not complete any intervention Cores, the eight caregivers who completed at least one of the intervention Cores tended to report more sleep impairment (insomnia symptom severity; minutes of sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset), less physical and emotional strain from caregiving, and less maladaptive sleep beliefs at the baseline assessment. These caregivers who used the program also showed large improvements in their insomnia symptoms. Caregivers' qualitative feedback about their experience with the program identified potential areas that might be modified to improve caregivers' engagement with and benefit from Internet-delivered insomnia programs.\n \n \n \n Findings suggest that family cancer caregivers can use and benefit from a fully automated Internet-delivered CBT-I program, even without caregiving-specific tailoring. Further rigorous research is needed to better understand whether and how program modifications may allow more caregivers to initiate and engage with this program.\n","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":"64 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/or9.0000000000000129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer caregivers are more likely to report clinically significant symptoms of insomnia than patients with cancer and the general population, yet research has been limited regarding cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) among this population. To better understand cancer caregivers' engagement with and benefit from CBT-I, cancer caregivers were enrolled in a nonrandomized pilot feasibility trial of an evidence-based Internet-delivered insomnia program. Thirteen caregivers completed mixed-methods assessments before receiving the insomnia program and after the nine-week intervention period. Compared with the five caregivers who did not complete any intervention Cores, the eight caregivers who completed at least one of the intervention Cores tended to report more sleep impairment (insomnia symptom severity; minutes of sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset), less physical and emotional strain from caregiving, and less maladaptive sleep beliefs at the baseline assessment. These caregivers who used the program also showed large improvements in their insomnia symptoms. Caregivers' qualitative feedback about their experience with the program identified potential areas that might be modified to improve caregivers' engagement with and benefit from Internet-delivered insomnia programs. Findings suggest that family cancer caregivers can use and benefit from a fully automated Internet-delivered CBT-I program, even without caregiving-specific tailoring. Further rigorous research is needed to better understand whether and how program modifications may allow more caregivers to initiate and engage with this program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症家庭照护者使用互联网提供的失眠干预并从中受益:单组可行性试验的结果
与癌症患者和普通人群相比,癌症护理人员更有可能报告有临床意义的失眠症状,但针对这一人群的失眠认知行为疗法(CBT-I)的研究却很有限。 为了更好地了解癌症护理人员对 CBT-I 的参与度和受益情况,癌症护理人员参加了一项非随机的试点可行性试验,该试验是基于证据的互联网失眠项目。13 名护理人员在接受失眠计划之前和为期九周的干预期之后完成了混合方法评估。 与五位未完成任何干预核心内容的护理人员相比,八位至少完成了一项干预核心内容的护理人员在基线评估时倾向于报告更多的睡眠障碍(失眠症状严重程度;睡眠开始潜伏期和睡眠开始后唤醒的分钟数)、更少的护理身心压力和更少的不良睡眠观念。这些使用该计划的护理人员的失眠症状也有很大改善。照顾者对他们使用该项目经验的定性反馈,指出了可能需要修改的地方,以提高照顾者对互联网提供的失眠项目的参与度并从中受益。 研究结果表明,癌症家庭护理人员可以使用全自动互联网提供的 CBT-I 程序,并从中受益,即使没有针对护理人员的量身定制。为了更好地了解程序修改是否以及如何使更多的照顾者能够启动并参与该程序,还需要进一步的严格研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the contribution of IPOS to psycho-oncology Evaluation of frailty, cognitive function, and age as prognostic factors for survival in patients with IDH1wild-type high-grade glioma Survivors of child and adolescent cancer experiences of bullying at school or work: self-report and parent proxy report Family cancer caregiver use of and benefit from an internet-delivered insomnia intervention: results from a single-group feasibility trial The role of peer support and patient navigation for empowerment in breast cancer survivors: implications for community cancer control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1