Dr N.P. Senanayake, FS Hiflan, H. Abeygoonawardena, RA Karawgoda, NS Chandrasiri, A. Balasuriya
{"title":"Comparison of broth microdilution and E-test for susceptibility of MRSA to vancomycin","authors":"Dr N.P. Senanayake, FS Hiflan, H. Abeygoonawardena, RA Karawgoda, NS Chandrasiri, A. Balasuriya","doi":"10.4038/sljid.v14i1.8598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) developed soon after the introduction of methicillin. These bacteria have shown resistance to multiple drugs and therefore vancomycin became the antibiotic of choice for treatment of MRSA infections. Vancomycin is a bactericidal antibiotic that acts by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis. This study aimed to compare broth microdilution (BMD) and E-test in determining vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against MRSA.Methods: A total of 30 clinical isolates of MRSA were acquired from Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Sri Lanka. These MRSA strains were identified by cefoxitin disk diffusion and the vancomycin MIC was determined through BMD and E-test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to test if the samples originated from the same distribution with post hoc determination of the correlation between methods using the Mann-Whitney U test.Results: All 30 MRSA isolates were 100% vancomycin susceptible (≤2 μg/mL) irrespective of methodology, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) established breakpoints. However, the E-test MIC values were 1 to 2 dilutions higher than those of BMD. A statistically significant difference between vancomycin MICs of BMD and E-test (p = <0.00001) was calculated which indicated a difference in accuracy.Conclusion: Due to cost, convenience, and the ability to detect vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), exploring the possibility of using E-test as an alternative to BMD is worthwhile.","PeriodicalId":32303,"journal":{"name":"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"141 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sri Lankan Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/sljid.v14i1.8598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) developed soon after the introduction of methicillin. These bacteria have shown resistance to multiple drugs and therefore vancomycin became the antibiotic of choice for treatment of MRSA infections. Vancomycin is a bactericidal antibiotic that acts by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis. This study aimed to compare broth microdilution (BMD) and E-test in determining vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against MRSA.Methods: A total of 30 clinical isolates of MRSA were acquired from Colombo South Teaching Hospital, Sri Lanka. These MRSA strains were identified by cefoxitin disk diffusion and the vancomycin MIC was determined through BMD and E-test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to test if the samples originated from the same distribution with post hoc determination of the correlation between methods using the Mann-Whitney U test.Results: All 30 MRSA isolates were 100% vancomycin susceptible (≤2 μg/mL) irrespective of methodology, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) established breakpoints. However, the E-test MIC values were 1 to 2 dilutions higher than those of BMD. A statistically significant difference between vancomycin MICs of BMD and E-test (p = <0.00001) was calculated which indicated a difference in accuracy.Conclusion: Due to cost, convenience, and the ability to detect vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), exploring the possibility of using E-test as an alternative to BMD is worthwhile.