The role of peer support and patient navigation for empowerment in breast cancer survivors: implications for community cancer control

Marc Sleiman, M. R. Yockel, A. Fleischmann, E. Silber, Mingqian Liu, Olivia Young, Sahana Arumani, K. Tercyak
{"title":"The role of peer support and patient navigation for empowerment in breast cancer survivors: implications for community cancer control","authors":"Marc Sleiman, M. R. Yockel, A. Fleischmann, E. Silber, Mingqian Liu, Olivia Young, Sahana Arumani, K. Tercyak","doi":"10.1097/or9.0000000000000128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Community-based organizations (CBO) offer support, including patient navigation (PN), to women at-risk for (eg, those with BRCA pathogenic variants) and surviving with breast cancer. However, the impacts of CBO efforts on survivors' empowerment (eg, control, self-confidence, knowledge/skills, coping) are largely unknown.\n \n \n \n As part of a quality improvement initiative (N = 2,247) focused on PN, care satisfaction, peer support, and quality of life (QoL), we conducted a secondary analysis of a CBO care delivery model on women's empowerment.\n \n \n \n Under CBO led cancer control, empowerment was high: most survivors felt confident in (71.2%) and knowledgeable about (66.4%) managing their care. Perceived care quality was also high (91%): it was recommendable to others (93.9%), helpful (92.7%), informative (92.6%), timely (92.2%), reliable (91.5%), supportive (91.3%), and effective (88.7%). Regarding CBO care satisfaction, survivors felt supported by abundant resources (92.8%) and programs (91.2%), understood (92.0%), and helped (91.6%). Peer support (offered to >25%) demonstrated high engagement (>85%). Regarding QoL, 25.3% were in fair/poor health and 25.6% endorsed frequent mental distress (M = 7.2 physically unhealthy days, M = 7.8 mentally unhealthy days, and M = 6.4 activity-limited days within the past month). Disparities in empowerment were observed as a function of survivors' QoL: lowest among those with more frequent mental distress (t = −2.13, P < .05), mentally unhealthy days (r = −0.083, P < .05), and activity-limited days (r = −0.058, P < .05)). These burdens may have influenced survivors' feelings of empowerment, especially among those without peer support (t = 3.77, P < .001), who downgraded the quality of PN (t = 0.60, P < .01), and were least satisfied with CBO cancer control (t = 0.57, P < .01). In a multivariable model adjusting for mental distress, both perceived PN quality (B = 0.16, SE = 0.01, P < .001) and peer support (B = 0.24, SE = 0.13, P = .05) were positively associated with empowerment: survivors who rated their PN higher, and offered peer support, felt more empowered.\n \n \n \n CBO cancer control can uplift most survivors: addressing socially determined disparities, through programs such as peer support, may enhance their effectiveness and particularly among those with poor mental health.\n","PeriodicalId":73915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","volume":"1118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychosocial oncology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/or9.0000000000000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community-based organizations (CBO) offer support, including patient navigation (PN), to women at-risk for (eg, those with BRCA pathogenic variants) and surviving with breast cancer. However, the impacts of CBO efforts on survivors' empowerment (eg, control, self-confidence, knowledge/skills, coping) are largely unknown. As part of a quality improvement initiative (N = 2,247) focused on PN, care satisfaction, peer support, and quality of life (QoL), we conducted a secondary analysis of a CBO care delivery model on women's empowerment. Under CBO led cancer control, empowerment was high: most survivors felt confident in (71.2%) and knowledgeable about (66.4%) managing their care. Perceived care quality was also high (91%): it was recommendable to others (93.9%), helpful (92.7%), informative (92.6%), timely (92.2%), reliable (91.5%), supportive (91.3%), and effective (88.7%). Regarding CBO care satisfaction, survivors felt supported by abundant resources (92.8%) and programs (91.2%), understood (92.0%), and helped (91.6%). Peer support (offered to >25%) demonstrated high engagement (>85%). Regarding QoL, 25.3% were in fair/poor health and 25.6% endorsed frequent mental distress (M = 7.2 physically unhealthy days, M = 7.8 mentally unhealthy days, and M = 6.4 activity-limited days within the past month). Disparities in empowerment were observed as a function of survivors' QoL: lowest among those with more frequent mental distress (t = −2.13, P < .05), mentally unhealthy days (r = −0.083, P < .05), and activity-limited days (r = −0.058, P < .05)). These burdens may have influenced survivors' feelings of empowerment, especially among those without peer support (t = 3.77, P < .001), who downgraded the quality of PN (t = 0.60, P < .01), and were least satisfied with CBO cancer control (t = 0.57, P < .01). In a multivariable model adjusting for mental distress, both perceived PN quality (B = 0.16, SE = 0.01, P < .001) and peer support (B = 0.24, SE = 0.13, P = .05) were positively associated with empowerment: survivors who rated their PN higher, and offered peer support, felt more empowered. CBO cancer control can uplift most survivors: addressing socially determined disparities, through programs such as peer support, may enhance their effectiveness and particularly among those with poor mental health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同伴支持和患者指导在增强乳腺癌幸存者能力方面的作用:对社区癌症控制的影响
社区组织(CBO)为乳腺癌高危妇女(例如,患有 BRCA 致病变异的妇女)和乳腺癌幸存者提供支持,包括患者指导(PN)。然而,CBO 的工作对提高幸存者能力(如控制力、自信心、知识/技能、应对能力)的影响在很大程度上是未知的。 作为一项质量改进计划(N = 2,247)的一部分,我们对 CBO 护理服务模式进行了二次分析,重点关注 PN、护理满意度、同伴支持和生活质量(QoL)。 在 CBO 领导下的癌症控制中,妇女的能力得到了很大的提高:大多数幸存者(71.2%)对自己的护理管理充满信心,(66.4%)对护理知识也有所了解。对护理质量的评价也很高(91%):可向他人推荐(93.9%)、有帮助(92.7%)、信息丰富(92.6%)、及时(92.2%)、可靠(91.5%)、支持(91.3%)和有效(88.7%)。在社区组织护理满意度方面,幸存者感到得到了丰富的资源(92.8%)和项目(91.2%)的支持、理解(92.0%)和帮助(91.6%)。同伴支持(提供给超过 25% 的幸存者)显示出较高的参与度(超过 85%)。在生活质量方面,25.3%的人健康状况一般/较差,25.6%的人经常感到精神痛苦(过去一个月内身体不健康天数为 7.2 天,精神不健康天数为 7.8 天,活动受限天数为 6.4 天)。根据幸存者 QoL 的函数,可以观察到赋权方面的差异:精神痛苦(t = -2.13,P < .05)、精神不健康天数(r = -0.083,P < .05)和活动受限天数(r = -0.058,P < .05)较多的幸存者赋权最低。)这些负担可能会影响幸存者的赋权感,尤其是那些没有同伴支持的幸存者(t = 3.77,P < .001),他们会降低 PN 的质量(t = 0.60,P < .01),并且对 CBO 癌症控制最不满意(t = 0.57,P < .01)。在调整精神痛苦的多变量模型中,感知到的 PN 质量(B = 0.16,SE = 0.01,P < .001)和同伴支持(B = 0.24,SE = 0.13,P = .05)与增强能力呈正相关:对其 PN 评价较高并提供同伴支持的幸存者感到更有能力。 社区组织的癌症控制可以提升大多数幸存者的能力:通过同伴支持等计划来解决社会决定的差异,可以提高其有效性,尤其是在那些心理健康状况不佳的幸存者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflections on the contribution of IPOS to psycho-oncology Evaluation of frailty, cognitive function, and age as prognostic factors for survival in patients with IDH1wild-type high-grade glioma Survivors of child and adolescent cancer experiences of bullying at school or work: self-report and parent proxy report Family cancer caregiver use of and benefit from an internet-delivered insomnia intervention: results from a single-group feasibility trial The role of peer support and patient navigation for empowerment in breast cancer survivors: implications for community cancer control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1