Obstetrics and gynecology patients’ perceptions about bedside teaching at a Saudi teaching hospital

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_229_23
Eman R. Mohamed, Manahel Almulhem, Abdulmohsen Alelq, Muhammed Zeeshan, Rakan S. Alharbi, Abdulsalam Almuhanna, M. S. Alotaibi, Fadi M. Alhabib
{"title":"Obstetrics and gynecology patients’ perceptions about bedside teaching at a Saudi teaching hospital","authors":"Eman R. Mohamed, Manahel Almulhem, Abdulmohsen Alelq, Muhammed Zeeshan, Rakan S. Alharbi, Abdulsalam Almuhanna, M. S. Alotaibi, Fadi M. Alhabib","doi":"10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_229_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Bedside teaching (BST) is a crucial component of medical education. It entails the interaction of students with patients in outpatient clinics and inpatient wards under the supervision of their tutors in order to improve the clinical skills of the students and, ultimately, patient outcomes. This teaching relies heavily on patients’ willingness and cooperation. The aim of this study was to assess the perception of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) patients regarding the presence and participation of medical students in BST.\n \n \n \n A cross-sectional survey was conducted among OB/GYN patients at the outpatient clinics and inpatient wards at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU) in Al-Khobar from January 1 to April 30, 2023. Data were collected online through the Google Drive survey tool using a validated and pilot tested questionnaire. Data were analyzed utilizing SPSS version 26.0. Chi-squared test was employed to test for association between two categorical variables. Multiple logistic regression model was used to determine variables associated with positive attitudes.\n \n \n \n A total of 507 patients completed online questionnaire. A highly positive patients’ attitude was observed toward the presence and participation of medical students during BST with a mean score of 81.8 ± 10.4. The acceptance rates were higher for female students compared to male students (91.9% vs 61.7%) and for senior doctors compared to junior doctors (89.9% vs 58.9%). Patients who came to the outpatient clinics were also more likely to accept students’ presence than those who went to hospital wards. Age, marital status, and previous clinic visits were positively associated with the acceptance level of the presence and involvement of medical students in BST without a significant difference.\n \n \n \n In general, patients had a good perception of medical students’ engagement in their care and that the gender of the medical students/doctors and clinical setting could affect this perception. Raising patients’ awareness of their valuable role in male medical students’ and doctors’ education should be raised, as this will increase their acceptance during BST.\n","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"366 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_229_23","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bedside teaching (BST) is a crucial component of medical education. It entails the interaction of students with patients in outpatient clinics and inpatient wards under the supervision of their tutors in order to improve the clinical skills of the students and, ultimately, patient outcomes. This teaching relies heavily on patients’ willingness and cooperation. The aim of this study was to assess the perception of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) patients regarding the presence and participation of medical students in BST. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among OB/GYN patients at the outpatient clinics and inpatient wards at King Fahd Hospital of the University (KFHU) in Al-Khobar from January 1 to April 30, 2023. Data were collected online through the Google Drive survey tool using a validated and pilot tested questionnaire. Data were analyzed utilizing SPSS version 26.0. Chi-squared test was employed to test for association between two categorical variables. Multiple logistic regression model was used to determine variables associated with positive attitudes. A total of 507 patients completed online questionnaire. A highly positive patients’ attitude was observed toward the presence and participation of medical students during BST with a mean score of 81.8 ± 10.4. The acceptance rates were higher for female students compared to male students (91.9% vs 61.7%) and for senior doctors compared to junior doctors (89.9% vs 58.9%). Patients who came to the outpatient clinics were also more likely to accept students’ presence than those who went to hospital wards. Age, marital status, and previous clinic visits were positively associated with the acceptance level of the presence and involvement of medical students in BST without a significant difference. In general, patients had a good perception of medical students’ engagement in their care and that the gender of the medical students/doctors and clinical setting could affect this perception. Raising patients’ awareness of their valuable role in male medical students’ and doctors’ education should be raised, as this will increase their acceptance during BST.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特教学医院妇产科患者对床边教学的看法
床旁教学(BST)是医学教育的重要组成部分。它要求学生在导师的指导下,在门诊诊所和住院病房与病人互动,以提高学生的临床技能,最终改善病人的治疗效果。这种教学在很大程度上依赖于患者的意愿和合作。本研究旨在评估妇产科(OB/GYN)患者对医科学生出席和参与 BST 的看法。 本研究于 2023 年 1 月 1 日至 4 月 30 日在位于 Al-Khobar 的法赫德国王大学医院(KFHU)的门诊和住院病房对妇产科患者进行了横断面调查。数据是通过 Google Drive 调查工具,使用经过验证和试点测试的问卷在线收集的。数据使用 SPSS 26.0 版进行分析。采用卡方检验法检验两个分类变量之间的关联。多元逻辑回归模型用于确定与积极态度相关的变量。 共有 507 名患者完成了在线问卷调查。结果显示,患者对医科学生在 BST 期间出现和参与的态度非常积极,平均得分为 81.8 ± 10.4。女学生的接受率高于男学生(91.9% vs 61.7%),资深医生的接受率高于初级医生(89.9% vs 58.9%)。到门诊就诊的病人也比到病房就诊的病人更容易接受学生的到来。年龄、婚姻状况和既往就诊经历与对医科学生出现和参与 BST 的接受程度呈正相关,但无显著差异。 总体而言,患者对医学生参与其护理工作的看法良好,而医学生/医生的性别和临床环境会影响这种看法。应提高患者对其在医学生和医生教育中的宝贵作用的认识,因为这将提高他们对 BST 的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Do All Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhages Need to Be Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center?" Asymmetric Alkyne Transformation via Gold/Organo Synergistic Catalysis. Function Decoupling and Modular Platform: Emerging Design Principles for MOF Luminescent Sensing. Computation-Driven Experimental Discovery of Reactivity Space of Organoboron Compounds. Issue Editorial Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1