Myositis-specific and Myositis-associated Autoantibodies in Saudi Patients

Q3 Health Professions Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_219_23
Rim Sghiri, Z. Shakoor, Mohammed Ahmed, Nuha Alrajhi, A. Almogren
{"title":"Myositis-specific and Myositis-associated Autoantibodies in Saudi Patients","authors":"Rim Sghiri, Z. Shakoor, Mohammed Ahmed, Nuha Alrajhi, A. Almogren","doi":"10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_219_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Data about myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) in Saudi patients are limited, and most studies have focused on anti-Jo1. This study aimed at reporting the MSAs and MAAs in Saudi population and their significance.\n \n \n \n This was a retrospective analysis of 190 Saudi patients investigated for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) between January 2019 and January 2023. Data for MSAs and MAAs were collected from medical records of patients. MSAs and MAAs were detected by line immunoblot.\n \n \n \n Among the 190 sera tested, 47 yielded positive results for MSAs. There were 19 (40.4%) patients with IIMs, 20 (42.6%) with interstitial lung disease (ILD), and 8 (17%) with connective tissue diseases. Anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) was the most common MSA and was positive among 16 (34%) patients. Anti-PL-12 was the most frequent anti-synthetase antibody (21.3%) followed by anti-PL-7 (19.1%). Anti-Jo1 was associated with Raynaud’s phenomenon (odds ratio [OR] = 9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3–60, P = 0.037) and with ILD (OR = 29, 95% CI = 2.4–351, P = 0.008) in patients with IIMs whereas anti-PL-7 was associated with ILD in the rest of the patients (OR = 6, 95% CI = 1.1–33, P = 0.021). MAAs were positive in 24 (51.1%) patients with anti-Ro52 as the most frequently detected antibody (29.8%).\n \n \n \n We confirm the association of MSAs with IIMs and ILD in the Saudi population. Anti-SRP and anti-PL-12 were the most common MSAs. These observations should be validated by large-scale studies.\n","PeriodicalId":33866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","volume":"723 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsm.jnsm_219_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data about myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) in Saudi patients are limited, and most studies have focused on anti-Jo1. This study aimed at reporting the MSAs and MAAs in Saudi population and their significance. This was a retrospective analysis of 190 Saudi patients investigated for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) between January 2019 and January 2023. Data for MSAs and MAAs were collected from medical records of patients. MSAs and MAAs were detected by line immunoblot. Among the 190 sera tested, 47 yielded positive results for MSAs. There were 19 (40.4%) patients with IIMs, 20 (42.6%) with interstitial lung disease (ILD), and 8 (17%) with connective tissue diseases. Anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) was the most common MSA and was positive among 16 (34%) patients. Anti-PL-12 was the most frequent anti-synthetase antibody (21.3%) followed by anti-PL-7 (19.1%). Anti-Jo1 was associated with Raynaud’s phenomenon (odds ratio [OR] = 9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3–60, P = 0.037) and with ILD (OR = 29, 95% CI = 2.4–351, P = 0.008) in patients with IIMs whereas anti-PL-7 was associated with ILD in the rest of the patients (OR = 6, 95% CI = 1.1–33, P = 0.021). MAAs were positive in 24 (51.1%) patients with anti-Ro52 as the most frequently detected antibody (29.8%). We confirm the association of MSAs with IIMs and ILD in the Saudi population. Anti-SRP and anti-PL-12 were the most common MSAs. These observations should be validated by large-scale studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特患者中的肌炎特异性和肌炎相关自身抗体
有关沙特患者肌炎特异性自身抗体(MSA)和肌炎相关自身抗体(MAA)的数据很有限,大多数研究都集中在抗Jo1上。本研究旨在报告沙特人群中的 MSA 和 MAA 及其重要性。 本研究对 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间接受特发性炎症性肌病(IIMs)检查的 190 名沙特患者进行了回顾性分析。从患者的医疗记录中收集了MSA和MAAs的数据。通过线免疫印迹法检测 MSAs 和 MAAs。 在检测的 190 份血清中,有 47 份的 MSAs 检测结果呈阳性。其中有19名(40.4%)患者患有IIMs,20名(42.6%)患者患有间质性肺病(ILD),8名(17%)患者患有结缔组织疾病。抗信号识别颗粒(SRP)是最常见的 MSA,16 名(34%)患者呈阳性。抗-PL-12是最常见的抗合成酶抗体(21.3%),其次是抗-PL-7(19.1%)。抗-Jo1与雷诺现象(几率比[OR] = 9,95% 置信区间[CI] = 1.3-60,P = 0.037)和IIMs患者的ILD(OR = 29,95% CI = 2.4-351,P = 0.008)相关,而抗-PL-7与其他患者的ILD相关(OR = 6,95% CI = 1.1-33,P = 0.021)。有 24 例(51.1%)患者的 MAA 呈阳性,抗 Ro52 是最常检测到的抗体(29.8%)。 我们证实,在沙特人群中,MSA 与 IIMs 和 ILD 相关。抗SRP和抗PL-12是最常见的MSA。这些观察结果应通过大规模研究加以验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine
Journal of Nature and Science of Medicine Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Menstrual Cycle Changes after the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Cross-sectional Study in Saudi Arabia The Use of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel as a Novel Combination for Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Recurrent Complicated Abdominal Sarcoma: Case Report and Review of Literature Faculty Experiences: Virtual versus Traditional Problem-based Learning during COVID-19 in a Saudi Medical College CD4+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy-treated Invasive Breast Cancer of No Special Type Evaluating the Novel Use of Unmanned Video Objective Structured Clinical Examination Stations in Pediatric Resident Training: Results and Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1