Weight management in rural health clinics: Results from the randomized midwest diet and exercise trial

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.753
A. Gorczyca, R. Washburn, L. Ptomey, M. Mayo, R. Krebill, Debra K Sullivan, Cheryl A Gibson, Sarah Stolte, Joseph E. Donnelly
{"title":"Weight management in rural health clinics: Results from the randomized midwest diet and exercise trial","authors":"A. Gorczyca, R. Washburn, L. Ptomey, M. Mayo, R. Krebill, Debra K Sullivan, Cheryl A Gibson, Sarah Stolte, Joseph E. Donnelly","doi":"10.1002/osp4.753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Rural living adults have higher rates of obesity compared with their urban counterparts and less access to weight management programs. Previous research studies have demonstrated clinically relevant weight loss in rural living adults who complete weight management programs delivered by university affiliated interventionists. However, this approach limits the potential reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of weight management programs for rural residents. Weight management delivered through rural health clinics by non‐physician clinic associated staff, for example, nurses, registered dieticians, allied health professionals, etc. has the potential to improve access to weight management for rural living adults. This trial compared the effectiveness of a 6‐month multicomponent weight management intervention for rural living adults delivered using group phone calls (GP), individual phone calls (IP) or an enhanced usual care control (EUC) by rural clinic associated staff trained by our research team. Methods Rural living adults with overweight/obesity (n = 187, age ∼ 50 years 82% female, body mass index ∼35 kg/m2) were randomized (2:2:1) to 1 of 3 intervention arms: GP, which included weekly ∼ 45 min sessions with 7–14 participants (n = 71), IP, which included weekly ∼ 15 min individual sessions (n = 80), or EUC, which included one‐45 min in‐person session at baseline. Results Weight loss at 6 months was clinically relevant, that is, ≥5% in the GP (−11.4 kg, 11.7%) and the IP arms (−9.1 kg, 9.2%) but not in the EUC arm (−2.6%, −2.5% kg). Specifically, 6 month weight loss was significantly greater in the IP versus EUC arms (−6.5 kg. p ≤ 0.025) but did not differ between the GP and IP arms (−2.4 kg, p > 0.025). The per participant cost per kg. weight loss for implementing the intervention was $93 and $60 for the IP and GP arms, respectively. Conclusions Weight management delivered by interventionists associated with rural health clinics using both group and IP calls results in clinically relevant 6 months weight loss in rural dwelling adults with overweight/obesity with the group format offering the most cost‐effective strategy. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02932748).","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Rural living adults have higher rates of obesity compared with their urban counterparts and less access to weight management programs. Previous research studies have demonstrated clinically relevant weight loss in rural living adults who complete weight management programs delivered by university affiliated interventionists. However, this approach limits the potential reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of weight management programs for rural residents. Weight management delivered through rural health clinics by non‐physician clinic associated staff, for example, nurses, registered dieticians, allied health professionals, etc. has the potential to improve access to weight management for rural living adults. This trial compared the effectiveness of a 6‐month multicomponent weight management intervention for rural living adults delivered using group phone calls (GP), individual phone calls (IP) or an enhanced usual care control (EUC) by rural clinic associated staff trained by our research team. Methods Rural living adults with overweight/obesity (n = 187, age ∼ 50 years 82% female, body mass index ∼35 kg/m2) were randomized (2:2:1) to 1 of 3 intervention arms: GP, which included weekly ∼ 45 min sessions with 7–14 participants (n = 71), IP, which included weekly ∼ 15 min individual sessions (n = 80), or EUC, which included one‐45 min in‐person session at baseline. Results Weight loss at 6 months was clinically relevant, that is, ≥5% in the GP (−11.4 kg, 11.7%) and the IP arms (−9.1 kg, 9.2%) but not in the EUC arm (−2.6%, −2.5% kg). Specifically, 6 month weight loss was significantly greater in the IP versus EUC arms (−6.5 kg. p ≤ 0.025) but did not differ between the GP and IP arms (−2.4 kg, p > 0.025). The per participant cost per kg. weight loss for implementing the intervention was $93 and $60 for the IP and GP arms, respectively. Conclusions Weight management delivered by interventionists associated with rural health clinics using both group and IP calls results in clinically relevant 6 months weight loss in rural dwelling adults with overweight/obesity with the group format offering the most cost‐effective strategy. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02932748).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村医疗诊所的体重管理:中西部饮食和运动随机试验的结果
摘要 引言 与城市成年人相比,农村成年人的肥胖率较高,而获得体重管理计划的机会较少。以往的研究表明,农村成年人在完成由大学附属干预机构提供的体重管理计划后,体重会有临床意义上的减轻。然而,这种方法限制了体重管理计划对农村居民的潜在影响、采纳、实施和维持。由非医生诊所相关人员(如护士、注册营养师、专职医疗人员等)通过农村健康诊所提供体重管理,有可能改善农村成年人体重管理的可及性。本试验比较了由我们的研究团队培训的农村诊所相关人员通过集体电话(GP)、个人电话(IP)或增强型常规护理对照(EUC)对农村成年人进行为期 6 个月的多成分体重管理干预的效果。方法 将患有超重/肥胖症的农村成年人(n = 187,年龄在 50 岁以下,82% 为女性,体重指数在 35 kg/m2 以下)随机(2:2:1)分配到三个干预组中的一个:GP(每周 7-14 人,每次 45 分钟)(n = 71)、IP(每周 7-14 人,每次 15 分钟)(n = 80)或 EUC(基线时进行一次 45 分钟的面对面训练)。结果 6 个月的体重减轻与临床相关,即 GP(-11.4 千克,11.7%)和 IP(-9.1 千克,9.2%)治疗组的体重减轻≥5%,而 EUC(-2.6%,-2.5% 千克)治疗组的体重减轻不明显。具体而言,6 个月的体重减轻在 IP 治疗组明显大于 EUC 治疗组(-6.5 千克,p ≤ 0.025),但在 GP 和 IP 治疗组之间没有差异(-2.4 千克,p > 0.025)。干预组和全科医生组的每位参与者每减重 1 公斤的成本分别为 93 美元和 60 美元。结论 由与农村医疗诊所有联系的干预人员通过小组和 IP 电话进行体重管理,可使居住在农村的超重/肥胖成年人在 6 个月内体重减轻,小组形式是最具成本效益的策略。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02932748)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of ongoing attendance at an Australian publicly funded specialist obesity service. The impact of weight self-stigma on weight-loss treatment engagement and outcome. Optimizing muscle preservation during weight loss in patients with cirrhosis: A pilot study comparing continuous energy restriction to alternate-day modified fasting for weight loss in patients with obesity and non-alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver. Patient, facility, and environmental factors associated with obesity treatment in US Veterans. Metabolic obesity phenotypes and thyroid cancer risk: A systematic exploration of the evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1