APMP key comparison of AC-DC current transfer standards: final report

IF 2.1 3区工程技术 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION Metrologia Pub Date : 2024-04-21 DOI:10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01003

Dr T Jing, Mr Thomas Hagen, Dr Steven Yang, Dr Hiroyuki Fujiki, Dr Hyung-Kew Lee, Dr Zhang Jiantao, Dr Eugene Golovins, Mr Chalit Kumtawee, Dr Muhammad Azwan Bin Ibrahim and Ms Hsiu-Ju Tsai

{"title":"APMP key comparison of AC-DC current transfer standards: final report","authors":"Dr T Jing, Mr Thomas Hagen, Dr Steven Yang, Dr Hiroyuki Fujiki, Dr Hyung-Kew Lee, Dr Zhang Jiantao, Dr Eugene Golovins, Mr Chalit Kumtawee, Dr Muhammad Azwan Bin Ibrahim and Ms Hsiu-Ju Tsai","doi":"10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report summarizes the results and performances of APMP.EM-K12, APMP key comparison of AC-DC current transfer standards of 10 mA and 5 A at frequencies of 10 Hz, 55 Hz, 1 kHz, 10 kHz, 20 kHz, 50 kHz, and 100 kHz. Ten National Metrology Institutes participated in this key comparison, including NMC/A*STAR (Singapore, pilot Laboratory), NMIA (Australia), SCL (Hong Kong, China), NMIJ (Japan), KRISS (Rep of Korea), NIM (China), NMISA (South Africa), NIMT (Thailand), NMIM (Malaysia), and CMS/ITRI (Chinese Taipei). The key comparison is linked to the CCEM one, CCCEM-K12, with same measurement quantities through the performances of two laboratories, NMC and NMIA, in both key comparisons. The degrees of equivalence of individual participating laboratories with the reference values of CCEM-K12 were thus concluded in this report. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).","PeriodicalId":18444,"journal":{"name":"Metrologia","volume":"153 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologia","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1a/01003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This report summarizes the results and performances of APMP.EM-K12, APMP key comparison of AC-DC current transfer standards of 10 mA and 5 A at frequencies of 10 Hz, 55 Hz, 1 kHz, 10 kHz, 20 kHz, 50 kHz, and 100 kHz. Ten National Metrology Institutes participated in this key comparison, including NMC/A*STAR (Singapore, pilot Laboratory), NMIA (Australia), SCL (Hong Kong, China), NMIJ (Japan), KRISS (Rep of Korea), NIM (China), NMISA (South Africa), NIMT (Thailand), NMIM (Malaysia), and CMS/ITRI (Chinese Taipei). The key comparison is linked to the CCEM one, CCCEM-K12, with same measurement quantities through the performances of two laboratories, NMC and NMIA, in both key comparisons. The degrees of equivalence of individual participating laboratories with the reference values of CCEM-K12 were thus concluded in this report. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

APMP 交直流电流传输标准关键比较：最终报告

本报告总结了 APMP.EM-K12 的结果和性能，即 10 mA 和 5 A 的交直流电流传输标准在 10 Hz、55 Hz、1 kHz、10 kHz、20 kHz、50 kHz 和 100 kHz 频率下的 APMP 关键比对。十个国家计量机构参加了此次关键比对，包括 NMC/A*STAR（新加坡，试验实验室）、NMIA（澳大利亚）、SCL（中国香港）、NMIJ（日本）、KRISS（韩国）、NIM（中国）、NMISA（南非）、NIMT（泰国）、NMIM（马来西亚）和 CMS/ITRI（中国台北）。通过 NMC 和 NMIA 这两个实验室在关键比对中的表现，关键比对与 CCEM 比对 CCCEM-K12 相连，测量数量相同。因此，本报告总结了各参与实验室与 CCEM-K12 参考值的等效程度。要阅读本文正文，请点击 "最终报告"。请注意，此文本是 BIPM 关键比对数据库 https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ 附录 B 中的文本。根据 CIPM 互认安排 (CIPM MRA) 的规定，最终报告已经过同行评审，并获准由 CCEM 出版。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Metrologia 工程技术-物理：应用

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

25.00%

发文量

137

审稿时长

12 months

期刊介绍： Published 6 times per year, Metrologia covers the fundamentals of measurements, particularly those dealing with the seven base units of the International System of Units (metre, kilogram, second, ampere, kelvin, candela, mole) or proposals to replace them. The journal also publishes papers that contribute to the solution of difficult measurement problems and improve the accuracy of derived units and constants that are of fundamental importance to physics. In addition to regular papers, the journal publishes review articles, issues devoted to single topics of timely interest and occasional conference proceedings. Letters to the Editor and Short Communications (generally three pages or less) are also considered.