{"title":"Charting the Globe. A Qualitative Longitudinal Analysis of the Englishes in German Curricula and Textbooks","authors":"Mona Nishizaki","doi":"10.1002/tesq.3327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades now, researchers and academics have lamented the mismatch between the representation of English in the classroom and the way the language is used in real‐world contexts. Much of teaching is bound by curricula that determine not only the contents of their teaching but also the materials and assessment methods they use, they are crucial to investigating changes within TESOL, which is especially true for the public school system in Germany. It therefore seems pertinent to turn our attention toward the administrative and prescriptive side of the decision‐making process in public school systems. In other words, to understand the ways in which Global Englishes can be, and have been, represented within classroom teaching contexts, it is necessary to scrutinize language curricula and mandatory textbooks. To appropriately evaluate necessary changes and developments toward GELT, we need to take a longitudinal view and identify changes over time, however small they may be. This study outlines changes in the conceptualization of English language and English communication over the last 5o years in accordance with relevant GELT themes in German secondary school. A selection of TESOL curricula alongside TESOL textbooks were analyzed as representative of changes in teaching practice. Structuring content analysis was used to identify changes in the representation of key themes. The curriculum analysis suggests keen awareness of the role English plays as a global communication tool from the 1990s, while the conceptualization of its speakers, speaking contexts, and relevant skills remain largely unchanged as the content analysis revealed a strong attachment to native speaker and standard English ideology throughout the curricula and textbooks.","PeriodicalId":48245,"journal":{"name":"Tesol Quarterly","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tesol Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For decades now, researchers and academics have lamented the mismatch between the representation of English in the classroom and the way the language is used in real‐world contexts. Much of teaching is bound by curricula that determine not only the contents of their teaching but also the materials and assessment methods they use, they are crucial to investigating changes within TESOL, which is especially true for the public school system in Germany. It therefore seems pertinent to turn our attention toward the administrative and prescriptive side of the decision‐making process in public school systems. In other words, to understand the ways in which Global Englishes can be, and have been, represented within classroom teaching contexts, it is necessary to scrutinize language curricula and mandatory textbooks. To appropriately evaluate necessary changes and developments toward GELT, we need to take a longitudinal view and identify changes over time, however small they may be. This study outlines changes in the conceptualization of English language and English communication over the last 5o years in accordance with relevant GELT themes in German secondary school. A selection of TESOL curricula alongside TESOL textbooks were analyzed as representative of changes in teaching practice. Structuring content analysis was used to identify changes in the representation of key themes. The curriculum analysis suggests keen awareness of the role English plays as a global communication tool from the 1990s, while the conceptualization of its speakers, speaking contexts, and relevant skills remain largely unchanged as the content analysis revealed a strong attachment to native speaker and standard English ideology throughout the curricula and textbooks.
期刊介绍:
TESOL Quarterly, a professional, refereed journal, was first published in 1967. The Quarterly encourages submission of previously unpublished articles on topics of significance to individuals concerned with English language teaching and learning and standard English as a second dialect. As a publication that represents a variety of cross-disciplinary interests, both theoretical and practical, the Quarterly invites manuscripts on a wide range of topics, especially in the following areas: -psychology and sociology of language learning and teaching -issues in research and research methodology -testing and evaluation -professional preparation -curriculum design and development -instructional methods, materials, and techniques -language planning -professional standards Because the Quarterly is committed to publishing manuscripts that contribute to bridging theory and practice in our profession, it particularly welcomes submissions that address the implications and applications of research in, for example, -anthropology -applied and theoretical linguistics -communication education -English education, including reading and writing theory -psycholinguistics -psychology -first and second language acquisition -sociolinguistics The Quarterly prefers that all submissions be written in a style that is accessible to a broad readership, including those individuals who may not be familiar with the subject matter. TESOL Quarterly is an international journal. It welcomes submissions from English language contexts around the world.