Preserving Both Privacy and Utility in Learning Analytics

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1109/TLT.2024.3393766
Chen Zhan;Srećko Joksimović;Djazia Ladjal;Thierry Rakotoarivelo;Ruth Marshall;Abelardo Pardo
{"title":"Preserving Both Privacy and Utility in Learning Analytics","authors":"Chen Zhan;Srećko Joksimović;Djazia Ladjal;Thierry Rakotoarivelo;Ruth Marshall;Abelardo Pardo","doi":"10.1109/TLT.2024.3393766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data are fundamental to Learning Analytics (LA) research and practice. However, the ethical use of data, particularly in terms of respecting learners' privacy rights, is a potential barrier that could hinder the widespread adoption of LA in the education industry. Despite the policies and guidelines of privacy protection being available worldwide, this does not guarantee successful implementation in practice. It is necessary to develop practical approaches that would allow for the translation of the existing guidelines into practice. In this study, we examine an initial set of privacy-preserving mechanisms on a large-scale education dataset. The data utility is evaluated before and after privacy-preserving mechanisms are applied by fitting into commonly used LA models, providing an evaluation of the utility loss. We further explore the balance between preserving data privacy and maintaining data utility in LA. The results prove the compatibility between preserving learners' privacy and LA, providing a benchmark of utility loss to practitioners and researchers in the education sector. Our study reminds an imminent concern of data privacy and advocates that privacy preserving can and should be an integral part of the design of any LA technique.","PeriodicalId":49191,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","volume":"17 ","pages":"1655-1667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10508498/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data are fundamental to Learning Analytics (LA) research and practice. However, the ethical use of data, particularly in terms of respecting learners' privacy rights, is a potential barrier that could hinder the widespread adoption of LA in the education industry. Despite the policies and guidelines of privacy protection being available worldwide, this does not guarantee successful implementation in practice. It is necessary to develop practical approaches that would allow for the translation of the existing guidelines into practice. In this study, we examine an initial set of privacy-preserving mechanisms on a large-scale education dataset. The data utility is evaluated before and after privacy-preserving mechanisms are applied by fitting into commonly used LA models, providing an evaluation of the utility loss. We further explore the balance between preserving data privacy and maintaining data utility in LA. The results prove the compatibility between preserving learners' privacy and LA, providing a benchmark of utility loss to practitioners and researchers in the education sector. Our study reminds an imminent concern of data privacy and advocates that privacy preserving can and should be an integral part of the design of any LA technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在学习分析中同时保护隐私和实用性
数据是学习分析(LA)研究和实践的基础。然而,数据的道德使用,特别是在尊重学习者隐私权方面,是阻碍学习分析在教育行业广泛应用的潜在障碍。尽管全世界都有保护隐私的政策和指导方针,但这并不能保证在实践中成功实施。有必要制定切实可行的方法,以便将现有准则转化为实践。在本研究中,我们在大规模教育数据集上检验了一套初步的隐私保护机制。在应用隐私保护机制之前和之后,我们通过拟合常用的洛杉矶模型来评估数据效用,从而对效用损失进行评估。我们进一步探讨了在洛杉矶法中保护数据隐私和维护数据效用之间的平衡。研究结果证明了保护学习者隐私与 LA 之间的兼容性,为教育领域的从业人员和研究人员提供了效用损失基准。我们的研究提醒人们关注迫在眉睫的数据隐私问题,并倡导保护隐私可以而且应该成为任何学习方法技术设计中不可或缺的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies covers all advances in learning technologies and their applications, including but not limited to the following topics: innovative online learning systems; intelligent tutors; educational games; simulation systems for education and training; collaborative learning tools; learning with mobile devices; wearable devices and interfaces for learning; personalized and adaptive learning systems; tools for formative and summative assessment; tools for learning analytics and educational data mining; ontologies for learning systems; standards and web services that support learning; authoring tools for learning materials; computer support for peer tutoring; learning via computer-mediated inquiry, field, and lab work; social learning techniques; social networks and infrastructures for learning and knowledge sharing; and creation and management of learning objects.
期刊最新文献
Exploring EFL Learners’ Integration and Perceptions of ChatGPT's Text Revisions: A Three-Stage Writing Task Study Adaptive Question–Answer Generation With Difficulty Control Using Item Response Theory and Pretrained Transformer Models Empowering Instructors: Augmented Reality Authoring Toolkit for Aviation Weather Education The Impact of Artificial General Intelligence-Assisted Project-Based Learning on Students’ Higher Order Thinking and Self-Efficacy Embedding Test Questions in Educational Mobile Virtual Reality: A Study on Hospital Hygiene Procedures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1