Optimal Treatment Order With Fibula-Free Flap Reconstruction, Oncologic Treatment, and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shreya Sriram, Moreen W Njoroge, Christopher D Lopez, Lily Zhu, Matthew J Heron, Katherine J Zhu, Cynthia T Yusuf, Robin Yang
{"title":"Optimal Treatment Order With Fibula-Free Flap Reconstruction, Oncologic Treatment, and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Shreya Sriram, Moreen W Njoroge, Christopher D Lopez, Lily Zhu, Matthew J Heron, Katherine J Zhu, Cynthia T Yusuf, Robin Yang","doi":"10.1097/scs.0000000000010127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients benefit from craniofacial reconstruction, but no clear guidance exists for rehabilitation timing. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the impact of oncologic treatment order on implant survival. An algorithm to guide placement sequence is also proposed in this paper. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies on HNC patients with ablative and fibula-free flap (FFF) reconstruction surgeries and radiotherapy (RTX). Primary outcomes included treatment sequence, implant survival rates, and RTX dose. Of 661 studies, 20 studies (617 implants, 199 patients) were included. Pooled survival rates for implants receiving >60 Gy RTX were significantly lower than implants receiving < 60 Gy (82.8% versus 90.1%, P=0.035). Placement >1 year after RTX completion improved implant survival rates (96.8% versus 82.5%, P=0.001). Implants receiving pre-placement RTX had increased survival with RTX postablation versus before (91.2% versus 74.8%, P<0.001). One hundred seventy-seven implants were placed only in FFF with higher survival than implants placed in FFF or native bone (90.4% versus 83.5%, P=0.035). Radiotherapy is detrimental to implant survival rates when administered too soon, in high doses, and before tumor resection. A novel evidence-based clinical decision-making algorithm was presented for utilization when determining the optimal treatment order for HNC patients. The overall survival of dental prostheses is acceptable, reaffirming their role as a key component in rehabilitating HNC patients. Considerations must be made regarding RTX dosage, timing, and implant location to optimize survival rates and patient outcomes for improved functionality, aesthetics, and comfort.","PeriodicalId":501649,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients benefit from craniofacial reconstruction, but no clear guidance exists for rehabilitation timing. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the impact of oncologic treatment order on implant survival. An algorithm to guide placement sequence is also proposed in this paper. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies on HNC patients with ablative and fibula-free flap (FFF) reconstruction surgeries and radiotherapy (RTX). Primary outcomes included treatment sequence, implant survival rates, and RTX dose. Of 661 studies, 20 studies (617 implants, 199 patients) were included. Pooled survival rates for implants receiving >60 Gy RTX were significantly lower than implants receiving < 60 Gy (82.8% versus 90.1%, P=0.035). Placement >1 year after RTX completion improved implant survival rates (96.8% versus 82.5%, P=0.001). Implants receiving pre-placement RTX had increased survival with RTX postablation versus before (91.2% versus 74.8%, P<0.001). One hundred seventy-seven implants were placed only in FFF with higher survival than implants placed in FFF or native bone (90.4% versus 83.5%, P=0.035). Radiotherapy is detrimental to implant survival rates when administered too soon, in high doses, and before tumor resection. A novel evidence-based clinical decision-making algorithm was presented for utilization when determining the optimal treatment order for HNC patients. The overall survival of dental prostheses is acceptable, reaffirming their role as a key component in rehabilitating HNC patients. Considerations must be made regarding RTX dosage, timing, and implant location to optimize survival rates and patient outcomes for improved functionality, aesthetics, and comfort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无腓骨皮瓣重建、肿瘤治疗和牙齿移植的最佳治疗顺序:系统回顾与元分析》。
头颈部癌症(HNC)患者从颅面重建中获益良多,但对于康复时机却没有明确的指导。本荟萃分析旨在阐明肿瘤治疗顺序对植入物存活率的影响。本文还提出了一种指导植入顺序的算法。我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 上检索了关于 HNC 患者消融和无腓骨瓣(FFF)重建手术及放疗(RTX)的研究。主要结果包括治疗顺序、植入物存活率和 RTX 剂量。在 661 项研究中,纳入了 20 项研究(617 个植入体,199 名患者)。接受>60 Gy RTX的植入体的总存活率明显低于接受<60 Gy的植入体(82.8%对90.1%,P=0.035)。RTX完成后1年再植入,植入物的存活率有所提高(96.8%对82.5%,P=0.001)。植入前接受 RTX 的种植体在 RTX 消融后的存活率比消融前更高(91.2% 对 74.8%,P<0.001)。177颗种植体仅植入FFF,其存活率高于植入FFF或原生骨的种植体(90.4%对83.5%,P=0.035)。如果放疗过早、剂量过大且在肿瘤切除前进行,则会对种植体的存活率造成损害。该研究提出了一种新的循证临床决策算法,用于确定 HNC 患者的最佳治疗顺序。牙科修复体的总体存活率是可以接受的,这再次证明了修复体在HNC患者康复中的关键作用。必须考虑 RTX 的剂量、时机和植入位置,以优化存活率和患者的治疗效果,从而提高功能性、美观度和舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Correlation Between Types of Orbital Fractures and Ocular Symptoms, and the Effect of Manual Preformed and Patient-Specific Mesh Implants: A Retrospective Study. Qualitative Research on the Causes of Kinesiophobia in Postoperative Cerebellar Tumor Patients. Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Prevention and Treatment of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Reduces the Recurrence Rate of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Big Data Analysis of Facial Fracture Epidemiology in South Korea From 2015 to 2020: Impacts of Aging and Personal Mobility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1