Big Data Analysis of Facial Fracture Epidemiology in South Korea From 2015 to 2020: Impacts of Aging and Personal Mobility.

Daiwon Jun,Jun Hyeok Lee,Shin Hyun Kim,Jong Yun Choi,Jangyoun Choi,Jung Ho Lee
{"title":"Big Data Analysis of Facial Fracture Epidemiology in South Korea From 2015 to 2020: Impacts of Aging and Personal Mobility.","authors":"Daiwon Jun,Jun Hyeok Lee,Shin Hyun Kim,Jong Yun Choi,Jangyoun Choi,Jung Ho Lee","doi":"10.1097/scs.0000000000010673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The epidemiology of facial fractures is continuously evolving due to various influencing factors, including social, economic, and technological advancements. Thus, an updated analysis of facial bone fractures is necessary. This study aimed to provide an updated epidemiological analysis of facial bone fractures and assess severity using multiple factors. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent facial bone fracture surgery at 3 teaching hospitals in South Korea between January 2015 and December 2020. Data collected included patient demographics (sex and age), trauma mechanism, alcohol intoxication status, and fracture types. Trauma mechanisms were categorized into 7 groups: assault, fall, sports, occupational injury, motor vehicle crash, bicycle, and personal mobility. Severity was assessed using the modified facial injury severity scale. A total of 5953 patients (4437 males and 1516 females) were included, with ages ranging from 1 to 92 years (mean age: 36.37±18.61 y). A steady decline in the number of patients was observed from 2015 to 2020. Falls were the most common cause of facial fractures (2300 cases, 39%), and nasal bone fractures were the most frequent type (3683 cases, 46%). The number of elderly patients (> 60 y) and injuries caused by personal mobility devices increased steadily. Male sex and alcohol intoxication were associated with higher severity scores. Motor vehicle crashes had the highest severity scores (2.246). While the incidence of facial bone fractures has decreased in recent years, the proportion of elderly patients and injuries caused by personal mobility devices is increasing, posing a significant burden on the health care system.","PeriodicalId":501649,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The epidemiology of facial fractures is continuously evolving due to various influencing factors, including social, economic, and technological advancements. Thus, an updated analysis of facial bone fractures is necessary. This study aimed to provide an updated epidemiological analysis of facial bone fractures and assess severity using multiple factors. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent facial bone fracture surgery at 3 teaching hospitals in South Korea between January 2015 and December 2020. Data collected included patient demographics (sex and age), trauma mechanism, alcohol intoxication status, and fracture types. Trauma mechanisms were categorized into 7 groups: assault, fall, sports, occupational injury, motor vehicle crash, bicycle, and personal mobility. Severity was assessed using the modified facial injury severity scale. A total of 5953 patients (4437 males and 1516 females) were included, with ages ranging from 1 to 92 years (mean age: 36.37±18.61 y). A steady decline in the number of patients was observed from 2015 to 2020. Falls were the most common cause of facial fractures (2300 cases, 39%), and nasal bone fractures were the most frequent type (3683 cases, 46%). The number of elderly patients (> 60 y) and injuries caused by personal mobility devices increased steadily. Male sex and alcohol intoxication were associated with higher severity scores. Motor vehicle crashes had the highest severity scores (2.246). While the incidence of facial bone fractures has decreased in recent years, the proportion of elderly patients and injuries caused by personal mobility devices is increasing, posing a significant burden on the health care system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015 至 2020 年韩国面部骨折流行病学大数据分析:老龄化和个人行动能力的影响。
由于各种影响因素,包括社会、经济和技术进步,面部骨折的流行病学在不断演变。因此,有必要对面部骨骼骨折进行最新分析。本研究旨在提供最新的面部骨骼骨折流行病学分析,并使用多种因素评估严重程度。我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在韩国 3 家教学医院接受面部骨骼骨折手术的患者。收集的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征(性别和年龄)、创伤机制、酒精中毒状态和骨折类型。创伤机制分为 7 组:袭击、跌倒、运动、工伤、机动车碰撞、自行车和个人移动。严重程度采用改良面部损伤严重程度量表进行评估。共纳入 5953 名患者(男性 4437 名,女性 1516 名),年龄从 1 岁到 92 岁不等(平均年龄:36.37±18.61 岁)。从2015年到2020年,患者人数持续下降。跌倒是面部骨折最常见的原因(2300 例,39%),鼻骨骨折是最常见的类型(3683 例,46%)。老年患者(60 岁以上)和个人移动设备造成的伤害数量稳步上升。男性和酒精中毒与较高的严重程度评分有关。机动车撞伤的严重程度得分最高(2.246)。虽然近年来面部骨折的发病率有所下降,但老年患者的比例和个人移动设备造成的伤害却在增加,这给医疗系统带来了沉重的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Correlation Between Types of Orbital Fractures and Ocular Symptoms, and the Effect of Manual Preformed and Patient-Specific Mesh Implants: A Retrospective Study. Qualitative Research on the Causes of Kinesiophobia in Postoperative Cerebellar Tumor Patients. Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Prevention and Treatment of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Reduces the Recurrence Rate of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Big Data Analysis of Facial Fracture Epidemiology in South Korea From 2015 to 2020: Impacts of Aging and Personal Mobility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1